Implant-supported Rehabilitation With SPAL Technique or Soft Tissue Augmentation (SPALvsSTA)

November 9, 2022 updated by: Leonardo Trombelli, Università degli Studi di Ferrara

Implant-supported Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Sites With a Novel, Simplified Technique for Bone Augmentation or Soft Tissue Augmentation: a Randomized Trial

The primary aim of the present study is to compare the Sub-periosteal Peri-implant Augmented Layer (SPAL) technique and soft tissue augmentation (STA), performed simultaneously to implant placement, in terms of (i) implant survival rate and (ii) health/disease condition of the peri-implant tissues at 6 and 12 months following implant loading. The secondary aim of the project will be to compare the SPAL technique and STA in terms of intra- and post-operative morbidity.

The study is designed as a single-blind, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial. Patients will be recruited and treated at the Operative Unit of Dentistry, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (A.U.S.L.) of Ferrara, Italy, and one University center (Research Centre for the Study of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases, University of Ferrara, Italy). Each patient will contribute the study with one sextant ("experimental sextant"). Each eligible patient will be randomly assigned to receive SPAL technique or STA according to a computer-generated randomization list. Surgical procedures will be performed by experienced periodontal and implant surgeons. Two calibrated, blinded examiners will take care of the assessment of clinical and radiographic parameters, Case Report Form (CRF) filling, as well as data extraction from CRFs for the preparation of the study database.

The proportion of patients free from peri-implantitis at 12 months following loading will be the primary outcome variable of the study. The proportion of patients with complete resolution of the bone dehiscence (BD), dimensional variations and 12-months characteristics of BD, and patient-reported outcome measures will be the secondary outcomes. The design will test two hypotheses, with a non-inferiority trial in terms of primary outcome and a superiority trial in terms of secondary outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Patient-specific inclusion criteria

  • age≥21years;
  • good physical status (ASA1 and ASA2 according to Physical Status Classification System) (American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2010);
  • systemic and local conditions compatible with implant placement and experimental procedures;
  • indication to a fixed, implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation with hard or soft tissue reconstructive procedures as part of the comprehensive oral rehabilitation plan;
  • patient willing and fully capable to comply with the study protocol.

Sextant-specific inclusion criteria

To be considered as experimental, a sextant will have to fulfill all the following criteria:

  • including at least one healed (i.e., ≥ 6 months elapsed from tooth loss) edentulous site;
  • horizontal dimension of the edentulous ridge compatible with the primary stability of an implant of at least 3.5 mm in diameter;
  • expected peri-implant buccal BD characterized by a height (measured as the apico-coronal height of the exposed implant surface) ≤ 5 mm or a thin (< 1 mm) peri-implant buccal bone plate as diagnosed on tridimensional planning for guided implant placement.

Patient will not be eligible for the study if presenting at least one of the following exclusion criteria:

Patient-specific exclusion criteria

  • current heavy smoking (≥20 cigarettes/day for ≥6 months prior to and at the time of the surgical procedure);
  • untreated periodontal disease prior to implant placement;
  • history of radiation therapy in the head and neck area;
  • history of chemotherapy;
  • systemic disease or conditions with a documented effect on bone metabolism and/or osseous healing;
  • past (within 6 months prior to enrolment in the study) or current treatment with any medication with a documented effect on bone metabolism and/or osseous healing;
  • documented allergy to dental materials involved in the experimental protocol;
  • pregnancy or lactation;
  • history of drug or alcohol abuse.

Moreover, participants immediately exited the study upon:

  • request to withdraw from further participation;
  • development of acute dental, peri-implant or oral conditions requiring treatment;
  • development of conditions conflicting with the inclusion criteria listed above;
  • failure to comply with study instructions/requirements.

Site specific exclusion criteria

  • presence of either a buccal BD > 5 mm in depth or a thick (≥ 1 mm) peri-implant buccal bone plate as clinically assessed with a periodontal probe immediately after implant placement;
  • presence of endodontic lesions at teeth adjacent to the implant site;
  • previous bone augmentation/preservation procedures at the designated implant areas;
  • need for vertical bone augmentation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sub-Periosteal Peri-implant Augmented Layer (SPAL) technique simultaneous to implant placement
In patients assigned to the SPAL group, the management of the soft tissues will be performed according to the SPAL technique as originally described by Trombelli et al. (2018). Implant site preparation will be performed using a set of calibrated guided surgery steel burs under copious sterile saline irrigation. Implants will be placed, and a healing abutment will be positioned and screwed. The space underneath the periosteal layer will be then filled with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) graft. A sterile viscoelastic gel (SVG) based on polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid (REGENFAST®, Mastelli Srl, Sanremo, Italia) will be combined with the bone graft. The periosteal layer will be then secured to the oral flap by mean of 6/0 resorbable internal mattress sutures. SVG wil be placed underneath the mucosal layer and the latter will be coronally advanced and stabilized a using 6/0 resorbable internal mattress and sling sutures.
In patients assigned to the SPAL group, the management of the soft tissues will be performed according to the SPAL technique as originally described by Trombelli et al. (2018). Implant site preparation will be performed using a set of calibrated guided surgery steel burs under copious sterile saline irrigation. Implants will be placed, and a healing abutment will be positioned and screwed. The space underneath the periosteal layer will be then filled with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) graft. A sterile viscoelastic gel (SVG) based on polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid (REGENFAST®, Mastelli Srl, Sanremo, Italia) will be combined with the bone graft. The periosteal layer will be then secured to the oral flap by mean of 6/0 resorbable internal mattress sutures. SVG wil be placed underneath the mucosal layer and the latter will be coronally advanced and stabilized a using 6/0 resorbable internal mattress and sling sutures.
Other Names:
  • SPAL
Active Comparator: Soft Tissue Augmentation (STA) simultaneous to implant placement
In patients assigned to the STA group, flap management will be performed as described by Stefanini et al. (2016). Implant site preparation will be performed according to the same procedures described for the SPAL group. SVG will be placed underneath the buccal flap and the latter will be then released from tension by means of periosteal and muscular incisions, and will be coronally advanced and adapted to the healing abutment with a 6/0 resorbable sling suture. Interrupted sutures will be used to accomplish primary intention closure in the interproximal areas.
In patients assigned to the STA group, flap management will be performed as described by Stefanini et al. (2016). Implant site preparation will be performed according to the same procedures described for the SPAL group. SVG will be placed underneath the buccal flap and the latter will be then released from tension by means of periosteal and muscular incisions, and will be coronally advanced and adapted to the healing abutment with a 6/0 resorbable sling suture. Interrupted sutures will be used to accomplish primary intention closure in the interproximal areas.
Other Names:
  • STA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients free from peri-implantitis
Time Frame: 12-month visit
Proportion of patients free from peri-implantitis (diagnosed according to the criteria described by Berglundh et al. 2018) at 12 months following loading
12-month visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete resolution of bone dehiscence (BD)
Time Frame: 12-month visit
Proportion of patients with complete resolution of BD as evaluated on CT/CBCT scan at 12 months following surgery
12-month visit
Changes in height and width of bone dehiscence (BD)
Time Frame: Pre-surgery and 12-month visits
Variations in height and width of bone dehiscence (BD) (as evaluated on CT/CBCT scan) occurred between pre-surgery visit 12-month visits
Pre-surgery and 12-month visits
Height and width of the residual bone dehiscence (BD)
Time Frame: 12-month visit
Height and width of bone dehiscence (BD) as evaluated on CT/CBCT scan at 12-month visit
12-month visit
Pain
Time Frame: Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Level of pain recorded in the evening at day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from "0-no pain" to "100-worst pain imaginable"
Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Dose of rescue anti-inflammatory drug
Time Frame: First 14 days following surgery
Dosage of rescue anti-inflammatory drug (i.e. number of ibuprofen 600 mg tablets) and other types of medications taken from the day of surgery to the 14th postoperative day, as recorded daily on a medication diary.
First 14 days following surgery
Discomfort
Time Frame: Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Level of discomfort, as recorded at day 0 (evening), +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 on a 5-point rating scale ranging from "no discomfort" to "very high discomfort"
Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Limitations in daily functions
Time Frame: Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Limitations in daily functions (i.e., swallowing, continuing daily activities, eating, speaking, opening the mouth, sleeping), as recorded at day 0 (evening), +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 on a 5-point rating scale ranging from "no limitations" to "unable to eat a lot of types of food" (for the "eating" item), and from "not at all difficult" to "extremely difficult" (for the other items)
Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Incidence of postoperative signs and symptoms
Time Frame: Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Incidence of postoperative signs and symptoms (i.e., swelling, nausea, bruising, bad taste/smell) at day 0 (evening), +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14
Day 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +7 and +14 following surgery
Willingness to undergo the same type of surgery
Time Frame: Day +14 following surgery
Willingness to undergo the same type of surgery, recorded at day +14 on a 4-point rating scale ranging from "no problem to repeat surgery if needed" to "I will never undergo this type of surgery again."
Day +14 following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Loss, Alveolar

Clinical Trials on Sub-Periosteal Peri-implant Augmented Layer technique

3
Subscribe