Novel Exhaled Breath Aerosol Collection Devices in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection - a Performance and Acceptability Study (AeroCAP)

August 7, 2025 updated by: Avelo AG

Novel Exhaled Breath Aerosol Collection Devices in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection - a Performance and Acceptability Study (Acronym: AeroCAP)

This study will assess the performance of two novel breath collection devices and their subsequent detection of respiratory pathogens compared to sputum samples in patients with lower respiratory tract infections.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults aged 18 and older admitted to the hospital with a clinical diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to understand the scope of the study and provide written informed consent
  • Age >18 years
  • Speaking German or English
  • Health status (assessed by study personnel at local site) well enough to use the breath collection devices
  • Willing to provide all three study samples (sputum and two breath samples) required for the study
  • Clinical diagnosis of a lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) defined as:

    (i) New infiltrate (chest X-ray, ultrasound, or CT scan), and (ii) at least one clinical symptom suggestive of LRTI (fever ≥38°C, chills, new or worsening cough, new or worsening sputum production, new or worsening dyspnea, tachypnoea, chest pain)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for whom the collection of all three study specimens within 48 hours of initiating antibiotic treatment is not feasible
  • Patients with known cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis
  • Critically ill patients at the discretion of the investigator
  • Patients on oxygen supplementation with a face mask, high-flow-oxygen, non-invasive or mechanical ventilation; oxygen supplementation via nasal cannula will be permitted.
  • Patients with proven acute pulmonary embolism
  • Patients with best supportive care
  • Patients with severe hypoxemia (SpO2 <88%) despite oxygen supplementation
  • Hospitalization within the last 14 days prior to admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathogen Concordance
Time Frame: 6 months
Overall percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and positive percent agreement between syndromic respiratory multiplex PCR results from breath samples and sputum samples.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of indeterminate breath results
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of breath samples with invalid and/or indeterminate syndromic respiratory multiplex PCR results
6 months
Usability
Time Frame: 2 days after sample collection
Assess the usability of the breath collection devices and sampling procedures by gathering user feedback from patients using a multiple choice questionnaire. Ease-of-use questions will be assessed using a 5-point difficulty rating system. Additionally, the investigators will assess the proportion of participants able to complete the breath collections without any deviations.
2 days after sample collection
Expanded user feedback
Time Frame: 2 days after sample collection

A subset of patients and clinicians will be observed during the breath collection process. The investigators will gather the proportion of participants making errors during breath collections and documenting any common difficulties.

User feedback data from a subset of patients and clinicians will be gathered via semi-structured interviews. Data will be assessed qualitatively for reported acceptability and user preferences.

2 days after sample collection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Sputum collection for molecular analysis

Subscribe