Placebo Response of Different Types of Sham Acupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis (PSAKOA)

November 18, 2024 updated by: Sun Xin, West China Hospital
This study aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to investigate the difference in clinical efficacy and blinding effect between real acupuncture and various sham acupuncture techniques.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aimed to recruit 150 patients with knee osteoarthritis from the hospital outpatient department. Random coding was generated using a computer network-based random system, and the subjects will be divided into five groups: real acupuncture, non-acupuncture at real-acupoint, shallow acupuncture at real-acupoint, shallow acupuncture at non-meridian and non-acupoint, and waiting treatment group in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Acupuncture sessions were conducted three times a week for two weeks. Patients in the waiting treatment group did not receive acupuncture therapy during the study period but received acupuncture treatment after the trial. Outcome measures included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score, Visual Analogue Pain (VAS) score, Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale (MASS) needle sensation score, and blind evaluation scale. Data collection occurred at baseline, one week, and two weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330000
        • Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis.
  • Age over 40 years old.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Tuberculosis, tumors, rheumatism of the knee joint, and rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Sprain or trauma in the lower limb.
  • Mental disorders.
  • Severe cardiovascular disease, liver or kidney impairment, immunodeficiency, diabetes mellitus, blood disorder or skin disease.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Use of physiotherapy for osteoarthritis knee pain in the past month; use of intra-articular injection of glucocorticoid or viscosupplementation in the past 6 months; received knee-replacement surgery; and positive floating patella test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Real Acupuncture
Acupuncture at nine acupoints. Patients received 6 sessions of acupuncture (three sessions per week or every other day) for two consecutive weeks
Patients received 6 sessions of acupuncture (three sessions per week or every other day) for two consecutive weeks
Sham Comparator: Non-acupuncture at real-acupoint
The acupuncture simulation device will be used to perform acupuncture at the same acupoints as those of the real acupuncture group.
The acupuncture simulation device will be used to perform acupuncture at the same acupoints as those of the real acupuncture group.
Sham Comparator: Shallow acupuncture at real-acupoint
At the same acupoint in the acupuncture group, the subcutaneous puncture is only 1-2 mm, no manipulation will be applied
At the same acupoint in the acupuncture group, the subcutaneous puncture is only 1-2 mm, no manipulation will be applied
Sham Comparator: Shallow acupuncture at non-meridian and non-acupoint
At non-meridian and non-acupoint, the subcutaneous puncture is only 1-2 mm, no manipulation will be applied
At non-meridian and non-acupoint, the subcutaneous puncture is only 1-2 mm, no manipulation will be applied
No Intervention: Waiting-list group
No acupuncture treatment will be given during the study period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 2 week
The WOMAC, a disease-specific scale with high reliability and validity, has been translated into different languages and used widely in clinical trials for KOA. The Chinese version of WOMAC contains 24 items that measure pain (5 items, scored 0-50), stiffness (2 items, scored 0-20) and physical function (17 items, scored 0-170), with a total score ranging from 0 to 240
2 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 week
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
2 week
Blind Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 2 week
The patients in the real acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups will be asked, "Do you think you are receiving real acupuncture treatment?" The patients' response options were "yes, no, and not sure."
2 week
Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale (MASS)
Time Frame: 2 week
The scale consists of 13 items and measures the body sensation experienced during acupuncture, including sensations such as acid, numbness, distension, pain, and heat. Each of the 13 entries utilizes a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with a range from 0cm (indicating no needle sensation) to 10cm (representing strong to unbearable needle sensation).
2 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Xin Sun, Doctor, West China Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 82305045 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Natural Science Foundation of China)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data can be shared with other researchers with the agreement of the Coordinating Committee and the Ethics Committee.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Real Acupuncture

Subscribe