Brain Connectome for Acupuncture-treated Migraine Patients (ACU-BRAIN)

Brain Connectome for Migraine Patients Treated Via Acupuncture: A Randomized, Controlled Study Under Single-blind Conditions, With a Placebo Group and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Acupuncture has been a means of treating headaches and migraine since 2002 and is now a World Health Organisation-recognized prophylactic treatment for migraine. Brain activation/de-activation via acupuncture modifies the haemodynamic responses in the brain which may impact the sensorial, cognitive and affective dimensions of pain. Randomized studies on patients suffering from aura-free migraine have shown that the painkilling effect of regular acupuncture sessions on the cerebral substratum, compared with simulated sham-type acupuncture, can reduce the frequency of bouts of migraine, number of days with headaches and also their intensity.

Modifications to the white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) occur after repeated sessions of acupuncture treatment for pain and these are observable via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is a very sensitive technique and often used to detect functional and structural brain changes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Since 2002, acupuncture has been employed as a method for treating headaches and migraine. It is recognized by the World Health Organisation (WHO), and is now part of the prophylactic treatments for migraine. Brain activations/de-activation via acupuncture lead to a modification of haemodynamic responses in the brain which may impact the sensorial, cognitive and affective dimensions of pain. Randomized studies on patients who suffer from migraine without aura have shown that the painkilling effect of repeated acupuncture sessions on the cerebral substratum, compared with simulated sham-type acupuncture, make it possible to reduce the frequency of bouts of migraine, the number of days of headaches, and the intensity of the bouts.

Following repeated sessions of acupuncture treatment for pain, modifications occur in the white matter (WM) and in the grey matter (GM) and these may be observed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which is a highly sensitive technique and very often used to detect functional brain changes and/or subtle abnormalities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with two to eight bouts of migraine without an aura per month
  • All patient aged (≥) 18 to (≤) 60 years old
  • All patients who have not had a bout of migraine in the last 24 hours
  • All patients who have given free informed consent and have signed the consent form.
  • All patients who are affiliated to or beneficiaries of a health insurance scheme
  • All patients available for a two-month follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with migraine which is secondary to a neurological, neuropsychiatric, or vascular disorder
  • All patients suffering from diabetes
  • All patients with a past history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • All patients with contraindications for an MRI scan
  • All patients on antidepressants or Botox.
  • All patients already taking part in Category 1 research involving the human person
  • All patients on an exclusion period determined by another study
  • All patients placed under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision
  • All patients for whom it is impossible to give the subject clear information
  • All patients who are pregnant, about to give birth or breastfeeding
  • All patient who have received botulinum toxin in the past year
  • All patient who have undergone antidepressant treatment in the last 2 months
  • All patient who have started a background migraine treatment for less than 3 months
  • All patient who have more than 14 migraine days per month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patients receiving real acupuncture treatment
Treatment with needle insertion
The patient will be treated for migraine with real acupuncture.
Sham Comparator: Patients receiving sham acupuncture treatment
Treatment without needle insertion
Sham acupuncture is used as a control in scientific studies to test the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of various disorders, in this case, migraine. In this study, the subjects will not know whether they are getting true acupuncture or not. In the placebo group, the acupuncture needles will not actually be inserted into the skin. Placebo needles consisting of a sliding tube and a retractible needle are applied to the acupunture reference point (marked by a pastille stuck on the skin). The patient should not be able to feel the difference between real acupuncture and sham acupuncture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regional homogeneity map in Interventional group patients BEFORE first real acupuncture session.
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity map in Interventional group patients AFTER first real acupuncture session.
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity map in Placebo group patients BEFORE first real acupuncture session.
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity map in Placebo group patients AFTER first real acupuncture session.
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity map in Interventional group patients BEFORE last real acupuncure session
Time Frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via acupuncture (Interventional group) is is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity map in Interventional group patients AFTER last real acupuncure session
Time Frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity map of Placebo group patients BEFORE last placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity map of Placebo group patients AFTER last placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients BEFORE first real acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients AFTER first real acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients BEFORE first placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients AFTER first placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients BEFORE last real acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients AFTER last real acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients BEFORE last placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients AFTER last placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Interventional group patients BEFORE first real acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter of Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Interventional group patients AFTER first real acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in the Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Placebo group patients BEFORE first placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Placebo group patients AFTER first placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Interventional group patients BEFORE last real acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Placebo group patients AFTER last real acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Interventional group patients BEFORE last placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in Placebo group patients AFTER last placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Interventional group patients BEFORE first real acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Interventional group patients AFTER first real acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Placebo group patients BEFORE first placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Placebo group patients AFTER first placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Interventional group patients BEFORE last real acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Interventional group patients AFTER last real acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Placebo group patients BEFORE last placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of the White Matter in Placebo group patients AFTER first placebo acupuncture session
Time Frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Change in number of days with migraine per month - Interventional group BEFORE treatment
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
Change in number of days with migraine per month - Interventional group AFTER treatment
Time Frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
At the end of the study (on Day 90)
Change in number of days with migraine per month - Placebo group BEFORE treatment
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
Change in number of days with migraine per month - Placebo group AFTER treatment
Time Frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
At the end of the study (on Day 90)
Pain BEFORE treatment in the Interventional group
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
Pain AFTER treatment in the Interventional group
Time Frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
At the end of the study (on Day 90)
Pain BEFORE treatment in the Placebo group
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
Pain AFTER treatment in the Placebo group
Time Frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
At the end of the study (on Day 90)
Impact of migraine on the Interventional group patients' Quality of Life (QOL) BEFORE treatment
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
Impact of migraine on the Interventional group patients' Quality of Life (QOL) AFTER treatment
Time Frame: At the end of the study on Day 90
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
At the end of the study on Day 90
Impact of migraine on the Placebo group patients' Quality of Life (QOL) BEFORE treatment.
Time Frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
Impact of migraine on the Placebo group patients' Quality of Life (QOL) AFTER treatment.
Time Frame: At the end of the study on Day 90
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
At the end of the study on Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anissa MEGZARI, Mme., CHU de Nîmes (Nîmes University Hospital)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acupuncture Therapy

Clinical Trials on Real acupuncture

3
Subscribe