- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06678035
Use of Simplified Lung Ultrasound Score for Predicting ICU Outcomes in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure
November 5, 2024 updated by: Mona Zakaria Hassab Elnabi Shahin, Assiut University
This study aims to
Primary Aims:
Verify the predictability of the PLIS at admission in predicting major clinical outcomes including:
- ICU mortality (or discharge) and time to death (or discharge)
- Escalation of ventilatory support antibiotic therapy or supportive medications (inotropes, steroids, sedation, neuromuscular blockers).
Secondary Aims:
- Determine the correlation between initial PLIS and the degree of disease severity (as evaluated per SOFA and APACHE II scores)
- Determine the correlation between initial PLIS and partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) to Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2): PaO2/FiO2
- Explore the potential association between the type of ventilatory support, ventilatory settings and PLIS at different time points.
- Verify whether the site of consolidation (anterior vs. posterior lung zones) can reliably predict mortality in in ALI patients.
- Determine the correlation between the PLIS score and the degree of ALI as quantified by CT of the chest (whenever a CT study is available) at the time of admission.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Detailed Description
Respiratory failure and acute lung injury (ALI) in patients admitted to ICU are major causes of morbidity And mortality As high as 60 % of ICU population dii during their ICU admission due to ALI Accurate assessment of the severity of ALI is Crucial for guiding treatment decisions and predicting patient outcome Reliance on chest X-ray and Computed tomography has its limitations including subjectivity and potential delays in obtaining and interpreting results high cost radiation exposure and lack of continuous monitoring particularly for critically ill patients Ultrasound -being non-invasive low cost radiation free- has been increasingly used as a bedside tool for evaluation and monitoring of ALI However most lung ultrasound protocols published to date are cumbersome and time consuming They typically involve screening at least 12 different lung areas each graded from 0 to 3 point thus generating scores ranging from 0 to 36 .While these scores are informative for research purposes they are less practical in a busy or ICU environment Also disregarding the site of B-lines or consolidation and the size of consolidation potentially under-estimates the severity of ALI Recently a novel -yet comprehensive- point of care ultrasound lung injury score has been developed to aid informative and quick assessment of ALI in ICU PLIS involves screening of only 3 areas but it uniquely considers the level of ventilatory support and gives credit to the number of B lines size of consolidation location of consultation The score reliably predicted to the need of ICU admission in a group off of COVID 19 patients directly correlation with their SOFA scores also predicted ICU mortality in this patient However Wider adoption of PLIS by intensivists dictates evaluation of its performance in a wider ICU population with a variety of underlying diagnoses This study is to verify whether PLIS remains valid for predicting ICU outcomes in patients with acute respiratory failure regardless the etiology type of respiratory failure oxygen requirement level of ventilatory support
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
72
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Mona Zakria Hassab Elnabi, resident doctor
- Phone Number: +201145682833
- Email: mony.zak05@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hend Mohamed Sayed, lecturer
- Phone Number: 01098988712
- Email: hend.m.saleh@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients who are more than 18 years in repiratory failure in ICU and use of chest us in supine or semisupine position
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age is or more than 18 years old.
- Admission to ICU in the first24 hours at time of recruitment to the study.
- Patients in respiratory failure [PaO2 is less then 60 % mmHg]
Exclusion Criteria:
- Co- existing chronic lung disease, pathology of which is known display abnormalities on US examination (interstitial lung diseases, bronchiectasis).
- Large pneumothorax or massive pleural effusion causing significant collapse and precluding proper visualization of underlying lung.
- Conditions that may interfere with lung ultrasound quality or probe contact such as marked obesity, severe chest wall deformities, burns or wounds.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ICU Mortality
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Percentage of patients who will die during their ICU admission
|
60 days
|
|
Time to death/discharge
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Number of days until the patient dies inside the ICU or becomes discharged from ICU
|
60 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Need for Therapy escalation: Ventilatory Support
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Binary response (yes or no), to whether the type of ventilatory support (COT-HVNI-NIV-IMV) was escalated or not
|
60 days
|
|
Need for Therapy Escalation: Ventilatory seetings
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Binary response (yes or no) to whether change in ventilatory settings (FiO2, IPAP, EPAP, Ti,TVe) was needed
|
60 days
|
|
Need for Therapy Escalation: Medications
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Binary response (yes/no) to whether medications like antibiotics, inotropes, sedation, or NMBs, which were not initiated needed to be added or not
|
60 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Marchioni A, Castaniere I, Tonelli R, Fantini R, Fontana M, Tabbi L, Viani A, Giaroni F, Ruggieri V, Cerri S, Clini E. Ultrasound-assessed diaphragmatic impairment is a predictor of outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing noninvasive ventilation. Crit Care. 2018 Apr 27;22(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2033-x.
- Biasucci DG, Buonsenso D, Piano A, Bonadia N, Vargas J, Settanni D, Bocci MG, Grieco DL, Carnicelli A, Scoppettuolo G, Eleuteri D, DE Pascale G, Pennisi MA, Franceschi F, Antonelli M; Gemelli Against COVID-19 Group. Lung ultrasound predicts non-invasive ventilation outcome in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: a pilot study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Sep;87(9):1006-1016. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15188-0. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
November 20, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 5, 2024
First Posted (Estimated)
November 7, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 7, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 5, 2024
Last Verified
October 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Chest US in ICU
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chest Infection
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreCompletedChest Wall Disease | Chest Wall Tumor | Chest Wall Mechanics | Chest Wall DeformityPakistan
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingPneumonia | Lower Respiratory Tract Infection | Chest Infection
-
Cardiff UniversityUniversity of Southampton; Universiteit Antwerpen; European Commission; Utrecht...CompletedCough | Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) | Chest InfectionUnited Kingdom
-
Clinical Locomotion ScienceOdense University Hospital; University of Southern Denmark; The County of Funen... and other collaboratorsCompletedUndiagnosed Chest Pain | Musculoskeletal Chest Pain | Non-cardiac Chest PainDenmark
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruiting
-
Delta University for Science and TechnologyCompletedChildren Chest InfectionEgypt
-
Legacy Biomechanics LaboratorySynthes Inc.CompletedFlail ChestUnited States
-
Kaiser PermanenteEnrolling by invitationPulmonary Edema - Acute | Chest InfectionUnited States
-
Hospital de GranollersCompleted
-
Radboud University Medical CenterRecruitingBlunt Chest TraumaNetherlands