Maintenance TMS in Treatment Resistant Depression

May 11, 2026 updated by: Austin Messner

Transitioning From Maintenance ECT to Maintenance TMS in Treatment Resistant Depression

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most efficacious treatments available for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although a maintenance ECT protocol exists, multiple barriers limit its use for long-term use. These barriers include procedure tolerability, cognitive side effects, financial burden, and unreliable social support to accompany patients for these treatments. On the other hand, a different modality of noninvasive neuromodulation called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be performed in the outpatient setting and does not need anesthesia. The likelihood of cognitive adverse effects with TMS is much lower than with ECT. Our clinical question encompasses piloting a maintenance TMS regimen to maintain remission in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

This will be a patient-preference clinical trial, with patients offered the choice to initiate maintenance TMS versus maintenance ECT after their index ECT sessions for treatment-resistant depression. There will be no randomization or placebo involved in this study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The clinical question encompasses piloting a maintenance TMS regimen to maintain remission in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

Patients who choose maintenance TMS will initiate maintenance TMS sessions on day one of the study and continue any currently prescribed pharmacotherapy. Participants will initiate TMS treatment within 1 week of last index ECT treatment. Participants will then follow a schedule of weekly for 4 sessions, every other week for 4 sessions, and monthly for 3 sessions for a total of 11 sessions in 6 months. Investigators will use the TMS paradigm called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), which was used in the SNT trial(Cole et al., 2022; Cole et al., 2020). At conclusion of the 6 month TMS portion of the study clinical judgement will be used to determine if the patient will return to maintenance ECT treatment. RBANS for assessment of cognition will be completed at the beginning, after 6 months, and at the conclusion of the study as well in both the standard of care and TMS portions of the study.

Those who choose maintenance ECT will transition to maintenance ECT treatments in the hospital as prescribed by their treating inpatient psychiatrists. On initial visit consent will be obtained and baseline cognitive and behavioral scales assessed as follows: Antidepressant treatment history form (ATHF), alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT-C), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), quick inventory of depressive symptomology (QIDS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS), standardized assessment of personality abbreviated scale (SAPAS). Patients will then be asked to return at 6 month and 12 month intervals to repeat HDRS, QIDS, RBANS, and CGI scales.

Research data will be collected primarily through self assessment scales including Antidepressant treatment history form (ATHF), alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT-C), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), quick inventory of depressive symptomology (QIDS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS), standardized assessment of personality abbreviated scale (SAPAS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40509
        • University of Kentucky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated for TRD who have achieved remission through an index series of ECT
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Deemed appropriate for maintenance TMS by their psychiatrist
  • Right-handed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of seizures or a seizure disorder
  • Related neurological disorder, or any other medical condition that would preclude TMS treatment determined by the treatment team.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TMS
Patients who have achieved remission of treatment resistant depression through an initial course of ECT (8 to 12 sessions) at the University of Kentucky will be identified by the ECT attending physician as a candidate for this study. They will receive TMS in this arm of study for maintenance treatment of their depression and monitored with depressive scales.
TMS will be given for the maintenance treatment of treatment resistant depression following successful course of ECT (8-12 treatments).
Other Names:
  • TMS
Active Comparator: ECT
Patients who have achieved remission of treatment resistant depression through an initial course of ECT (8 to 12 sessions) at the University of Kentucky will be identified by the ECT attending physician as a candidate for this study. If they elect to continue with maintenance ECT treatments which is the current standard of care, their depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning will be monitored accordingly.
Patients will remain in standard of care treatment and receive maintenance ECT treatments for treatment resistant depression
Other Names:
  • ECT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and prior to each procedure for duration of study, up to six months
One of the most widely used clinician administered depression scales containing 17 items. Scores range from 0 to 54 with 0-7 being normal, 8-16 being mild depression, 17-23 moderate depression and 24 or greater being severe depression. Higher scores equate to more severe depressive symptoms.
Baseline and prior to each procedure for duration of study, up to six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS)
Time Frame: Baseline on initial presentation, at 6 months, and at 12 months
Cognitive screening tool that is individually administered battery to measure cognitive decline or improvement. Scores range from 40 to 160. 69 and below is extremely low, 70-79 borderline, 80-89 low average, 90-109 average, 110-119 high average, 12-129 superior, and 130+ very superior. Higher scores equate to better cognitive functioning.
Baseline on initial presentation, at 6 months, and at 12 months
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)
Time Frame: Baseline and prior to each procedure for duration of study, up to six months
A widely used self-report scale of depression with similar validity to the HDRS that consists of 16 scale items. Scores range from 0 to 27 with 0-5 indicating no depression, 6-10 mild depression, 11-15 moderate depression, 16-20 severe, and 21 or higher very severe. Higher scores equate to more severe depressive symptoms.
Baseline and prior to each procedure for duration of study, up to six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gopalkumar Rakesh, MD, University of Kentucky

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)

Clinical Trials on Transmagnetic Stimulation

Subscribe