- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06682910
Assessment of Safety and Accuracy of the Microtech System in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation (Microtech-LVAD)
August 19, 2026 updated by: Microtech Medical Technologies, Ltd
An Early Feasibility Trial to Assess the Safety and Accuracy of the Microtech System in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
The Microtech-LVAD study is designed as a prospective, single arm, multi-center early feasibility study.
Approximately 15 patients will be enrolled in the study.
The study will be limited to patients in whom it is decided, based on routine clinical practice, that the LVAD will be implanted via a midline sternotomy.
In the first 5 study patients, the device will be implanted in the RA; subsequently, the device will be implanted in the LA unless the patient is deemed at high risk of post-LVAD right heart failure, in which case the device will be placed in the RA
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The Microtech-LVAD study is designed as a prospective, single arm, multi-center early feasibility study.
Approximately 15 patients will be enrolled in the study.
The study will be limited to patients in whom it is decided, based on routine clinical practice, that the LVAD will be implanted via a midline sternotomy.
In the first 5 study patients, the device will be implanted in the RA; subsequently, the device will be implanted in the LA unless the patient is deemed at high risk of post-LVAD right heart failure, in which case the device will be placed in the RA.
Clinical data will be collected pre-operatively, intra-operatively, throughout the post-operative hospitalization period, at discharge and at 1, 3-6, 9 and 12 months post-index procedure
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
15
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Petach Tikvah, Israel
- Rabin Medical Center
-
-
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Medical Center/ NewYork Presbyterian Hospital or CUMC/NYPH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is scheduled to undergo an elective LVAD implantation via midline sternotomy based on routine practice at the participating center.
- Patient is characterized as INTERMACS profile 2 or greater.
- Patient is able and willing to provide written informed consent.
- Patient is willing and able to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-operative coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
- For an intended LA implant, patient has a device implanted in the left atrial appendage (e.g., WATCHMAN or similar device) or a mechanical mitral valve
- Patient has an atrial myxoma
- Patient has pre-operative evidence of thrombus in the chamber in which the device is intended to be implanted
- Patient has a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to the index procedure
- History of systemic or pulmonary thromboembolism or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) within the last 6 months
- Patient has a history of congenital heart disease, including known atrial septal defect that is not corrected (including during the LVAD implantation procedure)
- Patient has severe mitral regurgitation (for an LA implant) or severe tricuspid regurgitation (for an RA implant) that is not intended to be corrected during the LVAD implantation
- Patient has known allergy to stainless steel or titanium
- Patient has noncardiac comorbidity that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, may limit life expectancy to less than 1 year
- Patient is pregnant or intends to become pregnant prior to completion of all protocol follow-up requirements
- Patient is participating in another investigational study that has not reached its primary endpoint
Intraoperative identification of any anatomical finding that would preclude safe access to, or closure of, the intended atrial chamber, or fixation of the device within the chamber including, but not limited to:
- Identification of thrombus in the atrium in which the device will be implanted
- Atrial anatomy deemed to be too thin or fragile to accept the implant
- Epicardial adhesions or any intraoperative finding that would complicate access or closure of the atrium in which the device is intended to be implanted
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Microtech System
|
Microtech sensor implantation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint
Time Frame: 6 months
|
|
6 months
|
|
Co-Primary Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 month
|
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The earliest post-operative day at which "valid" pressure measurements can be made from the Microtech implant
Time Frame: 1 month
|
The earliest post-operative day at which "valid" pressure measurements can be made from the Microtech implant.
A "valid" pressure measurement will be defined as a signal for which the system indicates a "fidelity score" >0.7.
Details of the fidelity score are provided in the protocol
|
1 month
|
|
Accuracy of Microtech pressure measurements in comparison to those obtained simultaneously by pulmonary artery catheter
Time Frame: pre procedure, 3-6 months
|
Accuracy of Microtech pressure measurements in comparison to those obtained simultaneously by pulmonary artery catheter (PAC; LAP from Microtech compared to PCWP from PAC, and RAP from Microtech and RAP from PAC or superior vena caval central line) at baseline and at a follow up between 3- and 6-months post implantation
|
pre procedure, 3-6 months
|
|
Accuracy of Microtech pressure measurements in comparison to those obtained simultaneously by pulmonary artery catheter
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Accuracy of Microtech pressure measurements in comparison to those obtained simultaneously by pulmonary artery catheter (LAP from Microtech compared to PCWP from PAC, and RAP from Microtech and RAP from PAC or superior vena caval central line) at all follow visits from which data are available throughout the 1 year follow up period
|
1 year
|
|
Anatomic stability of the implant over the observation period
Time Frame: post operation, 1 month, 3-6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Anatomic stability of the implant over the observation period, assessed by echocardiographic imaging at post-op, 1, 3-6, 9, 12 months follow-up visits
|
post operation, 1 month, 3-6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
|
The incidence of device-related adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The incidence of device-related adverse events through 1 year follow-up
|
12 months
|
|
Correlation of changes of sensor-measured atrial pressure
Time Frame: 1 month, 3-6 months , 9months and 12 month
|
Correlation of changes of sensor-measured atrial pressure with the following clinical parameters performed on the 1, 3-6, 9 and 12 month follow up visits:
|
1 month, 3-6 months , 9months and 12 month
|
|
Usability of the system
Time Frame: baseline, 30-6 months, 12 months
|
Usability of the system in order to obtain pressure measurements (Human Factors testing) at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months visits
|
baseline, 30-6 months, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 8, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
November 12, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 21, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 19, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Microtech-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.