Effect of Interferon Gamma as a Treatment for Post-aggressive Immunosuppression in Intensive Care Units, a Randomized Bayesian Double-blind Controlled Trial Versus Placebo (INFINITY)

January 19, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
The vast majority of serious clinical situations leading to intensive care (septic shock, polytrauma, acute cerebral aggression, major surgery) are characterized by significant systemic inflammation. Recently, the existence of a common immune response pattern to acute aggression has been demonstrated, and with it the existence of a phenomenon known as post-aggressive immunosuppression (PAIS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The vast majority of serious clinical situations leading to intensive care (septic shock, polytrauma, acute cerebral aggression, major surgery) are characterized by significant systemic inflammation. Recently, the existence of a common immune response pattern to acute aggression has been demonstrated, and with it the existence of a phenomenon known as post-aggressive immunosuppression (PAIS).

This immunological adaptation, initially implemented as a host defense mechanism to protect against an overwhelming systemic reaction, can, if prolonged, lead to multiple complications resulting in significant delayed morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is based on the use of immuno-inflammatory biomarkers, the most widely studied of which is monocyte expression of major histocompatibility complex type II molecules (mHLA-DR).

We have recently confirmed that PAIS can affect all types of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, but mainly occurs in the most severe patients. We also showed that the occurrence of PAIS was strongly associated with the subsequent occurrence of secondary infection and excess mortality.

Currently, there is no treatment with proven efficacy for PAIS, but several drugs have been shown to restore leukocyte function in-vitro. Several teams have reported the use of immunostimulatory molecules in patients with treatment failure, with a good safety profile and encouraging results. We believe that earlier treatment of patients with proven PAIS could improve their clinical outcome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

170

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • SOFA score for first 24 hours post-admission ≥ 6
  • Mechanically ventilated at the time of inclusion (non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal oxygen excluded)
  • mHLA-DR< 8,000 AB/C measured between the 5th and 10th day after admission to the intensive care unit
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Written consent (relative/trusted person)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with estimated life expectancy of less than 3 months
  • Patients with a predicted remaining stay in intensive care < 72 hours
  • Patient with pre-existing immunosuppression: solid cancer active or in remission for < 5 years, active hemopathy or in remission for < 5 years, systemic disease (including in the absence of specific treatment), solid organ transplant or marrow allograft patient, patient suffering from a HIV infection
  • Patients with an expected prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation: comatose or vegetative patients (admission for severe stroke with Glasgow score < 8, patient resuscitated from an arterial stroke,) patients with tracheotomy for ENT problems, patients suffering from muscular disease (e.g. myopathy), patients on long-term mechanical ventilation
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Contraindication of Imukin (hypersensitivity to interferon gamma-1b or known hypersensitivity to related products, such as another interferon)
  • Patients on immunosuppressive therapy, including long-term corticosteroid therapy (>2.5mg/d prednisone equivalent)
  • Patients with severe hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • Patient included in another interventional clinical trial
  • People under court protection and protected adults

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: interferon gamma-1b injection

Patients randomized to the experimental arm will receive :

Recombinant human interferon gamma-1b 2 X 106 IU, injectable solution. Subcutaneous injection every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days (3 total injections)

interferon gamma-1b 2 X 106 IU, injectable solution. Subcutaneous injection every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days (3 total injections)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo injection
Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive saline injectable solution. Subcutaneous injection every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days (3 total injections)
Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive saline injectable solution. Subcutaneous injection every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days (3 total injections)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of days alive without mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: on Day 28 after drug administration
number of days alive without mechanical ventilation on day 28 after randomization or on discharge from intensive care if this occurs before the 28th day
on Day 28 after drug administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality at Day 28 and Day 90 after randomization
Time Frame: Day 28 and Day 90 after randomization
Mortality rate at Day 28 and Day 90 after randomization between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Day 28 and Day 90 after randomization
incidence of nosocomial infections during intensive care unit stay
Time Frame: from Day 0 to Day 28 (or the discharge from intensive care)
The incidence of nosocomial infections during an ICU stay between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
from Day 0 to Day 28 (or the discharge from intensive care)
number of days alive whithout antibiotic
Time Frame: Day 28 after drug administration
Number of days alive without antibiotic assessed on day 28 after randomization between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Day 28 after drug administration
length of stay in intensive care between patients
Time Frame: from Day 0 to Day 28 (or the discharge from intensive care)
Number of days in intensive care between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
from Day 0 to Day 28 (or the discharge from intensive care)
- Compare organ failure score (SOFA) kinetics between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time Frame: From inclusion to Day 7
Kinetics of SOFA score assessed at inclusion and during the 7 days following inclusion between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
From inclusion to Day 7
Evaluate the efficacy of IFNy in correcting PAIS-defining biological abnormalities (re-ascension of mHLA-DR above 8,000 AB/C) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 7 and at Day 28 post randomization
Evolution of mHLA-DR measured at Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 28 or at discharge from intensive care if earlier (Day 0 corresponding to the day of inclusion in the study) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo.
Day 1 to Day 7 and at Day 28 post randomization
Evaluate, depending on the randomization arm, the kinetics of plasma inflammatory parameters between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 3 and at Day 7 post randomization
Evolution of inflammation markers (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, TNFa, etc.) measured in plasma at Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7, or at discharge from intensive care if it occurs before (Day 0 corresponding to the day of inclusion in the study) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Day 0, Day 3 and at Day 7 post randomization
Evaluate, depending on the randomization arm, the transcriptomic profile of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells count between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7 after randomization
Evolution of the transcriptomic profile of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using scRNAseq analysis measured at Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7 or upon discharge from intensive care if this occurs earlier.
Day 0, Day 3 and Day 7 after randomization
Evaluate, depending on the randomization arm the leucocyte count between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 7 and at Day 28 post randomization
Evolution and kenetics of the leucocyte count measured at Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 28 or at discharge from intensive care if earlier (Day 0 corresponding to the day of inclusion in the study) between patients treated with recombinant interferon gamma 1-b versus placebo
Day 0 to Day 7 and at Day 28 post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Charles De ROQUETAILLADE, MD, APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-aggressive Immunosuppression

Clinical Trials on Interferon Gamma 1-b

Subscribe