- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06701474
Comparison of Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Between Low Phase Angle and High Phase Angle Group
Association Between Phase Angle and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
The goal of this observational study is to compare the functional outcome of patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) before and after total knee arthroplasty based on the phase angle level.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Do patients with low phase angle show worse functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty compared to those with high phase angle?
- Is postoperative physical function associated with preoperative phase angle level?
Researchers will compare postoperative physical function and muscle strength between the low and high phase angle groups to determine whether a low phase angle is associated with poorer functional recovery.
Participants will:
Perform physical function tests, isokinetic strength assessments, and bioelectrical impedance analysis before and three months after surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
After obtaining informed consent, a pre-surgical screening is conducted. Participants complete a history survey, a sarcopenia questionnaire, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
The screening includes a comprehensive evaluation of baseline symptoms, followed by functional assessments that incorporate bioelectrical impedance analysis, muscle strength testing, and performance-based tests:
- A modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is used to assess comorbidity burden, and a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) records participants' initial pain levels.
- Radiographic assessments are performed to evaluate the frontal alignment of the lower extremities and the radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grading system.
- Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is used to measure phase angle and body composition.
- Handgrip strength is measured through three trials on each side, with the average recorded.
- Knee strength is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer.
- Performance-based tests include the 10-meter walk test, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS).
Follow-up assessments are conducted three months after total knee arthroplasty, with participants undergoing the same protocol for performance-based tests, isokinetic knee strength evaluation, and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Na Young Kim, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +82 010 9127 4482
- Email: kny8452@yuhs.ac
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Young Seok Kim, MD
- Phone Number: +82 010 7225 3661
- Email: kys3661@yuhs.ac
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeonggi-do
-
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 16995
- Recruiting
- Yongin Severance Hospital
-
Contact:
- Na Young Kim, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +82 010 9127 4482
- Email: kny8452@yuhs.ac
-
Principal Investigator:
- Na Young Kim, MD, PhD
-
Contact:
- Young Seok Kim, MD
- Phone Number: +82 010 7225 3661
- Email: kys3661@yuhs.ac
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals aged 55 and over (based on the age on their national ID at the time of consent)
- Individuals diagnosed with knee OA based on medical history, physical examination, and radiographic assessments.
- Individuals who plan to perform total knee arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals with gait disturbance due to neurologic disorders such as Parkinson disease, stroke and dementia
- Individuals with severe cardiac, pulmonary, or musculoskeletal disorders that limited quadriceps strength and physical function
- Individuals with knee osteoarthritis due to secondary causes such as rheumatic or traumatic arthritis
- Individuals with a history of any knee surgery within one year.
- Individuals considered clinically unsuitable for the study by the researchers or person in charge based on significant medical findings.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
high PhA
|
|
low PhA
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
Researchers ask patients to rise from a seated position, walk a distance of 3 m, turn around, return to the chair, and sit back. The average time of three trials was recorded as a result |
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
10 meter walk test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
Patients are instructed to walk 14 m, including 2 m at both ends for acceleration and deceleration, at their comfortable speed. Gait speed was calculated by dividing the 10m distance by the time taken. |
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Berg balance scale (BBS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
Patients are asked to perform 14 tasks regarding the static and dynamic balance of patients.
Each task was rated on a five-point scale from 0 to 4, with a total score of 56.
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Isokinetic peak torque of knee flexion at 60°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Isokinetic peak torque of knee flexion at 150°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Isokinetic peak torque of knee extension at 60°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Isokinetic peak torque of knee extension at 150°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Isokinetic total work of knee flexion at 60°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Isokinetic total work of knee flexion at 150°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Isokinetic total work of knee extension at 60°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Isokinetic total work of knee extension at 150°/s
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Whole body phase angle at 50kHz
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
|
Baseline and 3 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
- Uemura K, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Nakakubo S, Kim MJ, Kurita S, Ishii H, Shimada H. Predictivity of bioimpedance phase angle for incident disability in older adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Feb;11(1):46-54. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12492. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
- Martins PC, Alves Junior CAS, Silva AM, Silva DAS. Phase angle and body composition: A scoping review. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Aug;56:237-250. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
- Stapel SN, Looijaard WGPM, Dekker IM, Girbes ARJ, Weijs PJM, Oudemans-van Straaten HM. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle at admission as a predictor of 90-day mortality in intensive care patients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jul;72(7):1019-1025. doi: 10.1038/s41430-018-0167-1. Epub 2018 May 11.
- Sardinha LB, Rosa GB. Phase angle, muscle tissue, and resistance training. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023 Jun;24(3):393-414. doi: 10.1007/s11154-023-09791-8. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
- Harris IA, Harris AM, Naylor JM, Adie S, Mittal R, Dao AT. Discordance between patient and surgeon satisfaction after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.044. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
- Capin JJ, Bade MJ, Jennings JM, Snyder-Mackler L, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Total Knee Arthroplasty Assessments Should Include Strength and Performance-Based Functional Tests to Complement Range-of-Motion and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Phys Ther. 2022 Jun 3;102(6):pzac033. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac033.
- Wieczorek M, Rotonda C, Guillemin F, Rat AC. What Have We Learned About the Course of Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Nov;72(11):1519-1529. doi: 10.1002/acr.24045.
- GBD 2021 Osteoarthritis Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990-2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Aug 21;5(9):e508-e522. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00163-7. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 9-2024-0150
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.