The Rainbow Study - the Effect of Feedback on Asthmatic Symptom Perception

November 22, 2024 updated by: Medisch Spectrum Twente

The Rainbow Study - a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Personalized Feedback on Symptom Perception in Asthmatic Children

Asthma is a common childhood disease that is characterized by chronic airway inflammation and episodic expiratory airflow obstruction. Asthma symptoms can impair participation in play and sports and have a negative impact on quality of life. It can be challenging for children to adequately feel and report their symptoms. Some children experience more symptoms than expected based on lung function during these symptoms, whereas others experience less symptoms than expected. This is also called 'symptom perception'.

A tool was developed to visualize symptoms, lung function and accessory symptom perception: The Rainbow tool. The aim of this study was to identify asthmatic children with a poor perception and investigate if their symptom perception could be improved by regular lung function measurements and personal feedback based on the Rainbow Tool.

Hypothesis: Measuring lung function en symptoms and provide personal feedback on perception based on the Rainbow tool has a positive effect on perception of asthma-related symptoms in asthmatic children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Asthma is a common childhood disease that is characterized by chronic airway inflammation and episodic expiratory airflow obstruction. Asthma symptoms can impair participation in play and sports and have a negative impact on quality of life. It can be challenging for children to adequately feel and report their symptoms. Some children experience more symptoms than expected based on lung function during these symptoms, whereas others experience less symptoms than expected. This is also called 'symptom perception'.

A tool was developed to visualize symptoms, lung function and accessory symptom perception: The Rainbow tool. The Rainbow tool is a two-dimensional color-coded plot, visualizing the relationship between lung function, denoted as a percentage of personal best (FEV1) on the vertical axis, and VAS score on the horizontal axis. The FEV1 as a percentage of personal best on the vertical axis ranges from 30% to 100% since a maximal VAS score would be expected with a change in FEV1 to ≤ 30% of personal best. The horizontal axis ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no dyspnea and 10 maximal dyspnea. There are four color-coded zones: the green zone, yellow zone, orange zone, and red zone. The green zone indicates good alignment between symptoms and lung function, and thus a good symptom perception. It forms a diagonal band from the upper left (around 100% FEV1 and VAS score of 0) stretching to the lower right (around 30% FEV1 and VAS score of 10). The green zone is followed by the yellow, orange, and red zones on either side, indicating an increasing deviation in symptom perception from the ideal and respectively mild, moderate, and severe disconcordance between FEV1 and VAS score. The aim of this study was to identify asthmatic children with a poor perception and investigate if their symptom perception could be improved by regular lung function measurements and personal feedback based on the Rainbow Tool.

Hypothesis: Measuring lung function en symptoms and provide personal feedback on perception based on the Rainbow tool has a positive effect on perception of asthma-related symptoms in asthmatic children.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Overijssel
      • Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands, 7512 KZ
        • Recruiting
        • Medisch Spectrum Twente
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Selection phase:

  • Pediatrician diagnosed asthma
  • Health care professional thinks perception might be poor
  • Age 7 until 15 years old
  • Adequate understanding of Dutch language

Intervention phase:

  • Adequate number of lung function measurements + VAS scores during selection phase, defined as:
  • At least 4 measurements after exercise or when experiencing symptoms and
  • At least 2 standard measurements
  • Poor perception during selection phase, defined as:
  • At least 1 measurement in red zone on Perception Rainbow and/or
  • At least 2 measurements in orange zone on Perception Rainbow and/or
  • Average of all measurements after exercise or when experiencing symptoms in yellow zone (or orange/red)and/or
  • Average of all measurements in yellow zone (or orange/red)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe comorbidity (for example psychomotor retardation or severe cardiopulmonary conditions)
  • Not able to fill in VAS score (for example due to blindness)
  • Not able to perform technically correct spirometry manoeuvres
  • Medication change in past 2 weeks
  • Exacerbation which required oral prednisone in the past 6 weeks
  • Exacerbation at the moment of inclusion
  • No device (computer, tablet or smartphone) with internet connection available at home

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group (with feedback)
Collection of VAS scores and lung function. Explanation about the Rainbow tool to visualize symptom perception, and use of this tool during intervention phase. Feedback sessions with health care professional to evaluate symptom perception using the Rainbow tool.
The Rainbow tool visualizes perception based on lung function measurements and VAS scores.
Feedback sessions with health care professional based on the Rainbow tool.
Experimental: Intervention group (without feedback)
Collection of VAS scores and lung function. Explanation about the Rainbow tool to visualize symptom perception, and use of this tool during intervention phase.
The Rainbow tool visualizes perception based on lung function measurements and VAS scores.
No Intervention: Control group
Collection of VAS scores and lung function. No additional intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception score
Time Frame: Two week run-in versus last week of intervention
The difference in the average perception score (0-100) during the two-week run-in and last week of the intervention between the intervention group (with feedback) and the control group
Two week run-in versus last week of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception score intervention groups
Time Frame: Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Difference between average perception score of intervention group (with feedback) and intervention (without feedback) group per week
Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Perception score over time
Time Frame: Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Perception scores (0-100) and average perception score per week. Including over- or underperception
Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Perception score zones
Time Frame: Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Number of perception scores in green/yellow/red zone (absolute and relative) per week
Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Additional symptoms
Time Frame: Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Type of additional symptom when measurement (lung function + VAS) is performed: no additional symptoms, cough, wheezing, chest pain, feeling dizzy, nasal symptoms
Measured per week during the study period, which is 8 weeks
Drop-out rate
Time Frame: Per study phase, 2 weeks for selection phase, 3 weeks for intervention phase and 3 weeks for follow-up phase
Number of patients that drop-out during or after selection phase and reasons for drop-out
Per study phase, 2 weeks for selection phase, 3 weeks for intervention phase and 3 weeks for follow-up phase
User experience
Time Frame: After the intervention phase, that takes 3 weeks
User experience based on semi-structured interview and user experience + technology acceptance questionnaire after the intervention phase
After the intervention phase, that takes 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vera Hengeveld, MD, Medisch Spectrum Twente

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma in Children

Clinical Trials on Rainbow tool

Subscribe