- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06704087
Telemonitoring of Chronic Wound Patients Using MyDerm, a Digital Solution: Feasibility Study (PIXAPROM)
Télésurveillance de Patients Porteurs d'Une Plaie Chronique à l'Aide d'Une Solution numérique MyDerm : étude de faisabilité
The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of integrating myDerm for remote monitoring of chronic wounds into everyday practice, for patients over 18 years of age suffering from a single chronic wound of the lower limb (more than 6 weeks old).
Outcome measure 1 :
Evaluate patient satisfaction after 2 months of using the MyDerm solution.
Outcome measure 2 :
- Evaluate caregiver satisfaction after 2 months of patient use of MyDerm solution.
- Assess patient use (compliance, frequency) of MyDerm solution
- Evaluate caregiver use of PIXACARE solution
- Evaluate the impact of patients' socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, level of education: primary/secondary/tertiary, rural/urban) on use of the MyDerm solution.
- Evaluate the impact of patients' clinical characteristics on the use of the MyDerm solution.
Researchers will compare standard of care arm vs remote monitoring arm.
As part of remote monitoring, patients are invited to take photos of their wounds using their smartphone, and to answer a simple questionnaire to look for signs of complications. To assess satisfaction, the patient will complete a questionnaire after 2 months' use, using a 7-level Likert scale.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Observational, monocentric study of patients with chronic wounds of the lower limb benefiting from the digital solution for remote monitoring of wound healing.
Clinical data will be collected by the investigating team during the primary consultation.
Patient satisfaction surveys will be sent in paper format to patients at the consultation scheduled at the end of the two-month follow-up period.
Caregiver" satisfaction surveys will be sent in paper format to caregivers at the end of the study.
The number of actions taken in response to an alert (by telephone, by message, organization of a physical consultation, organization of a teleconsultation, hospitalization) will be recorded in the post-alert action traceability form
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
France
-
Corbeil-Essonnes, France, France, 91106
- Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient with a single chronic wound of the lower limb (more than 6 weeks)
- Benefiting from the MyDerm digital wound-healing monitoring solution
- Patient aged 18 or over
- Informed patient who has not objected to the use of data
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusing to participate in the study
- Patient included in a clinical trial
- Patient with a life expectancy shorter than the duration of the study
- Patient with cognitive impairment
- Inability to install or use the medical device for technical reasons (lack of internet connection, lack of 4G coverage or more, lack of smartphone)
- Patient requiring home hospital care
- Patient requiring Follow-up and rehabilitation care
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Patient with a previously infected wound
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Telemonitoring
patients with chronic wounds of the lower limb benefiting from the digital solution for remote monitoring of healing.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Response to questionnaire completed after two months of use
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
The satisfaction questionnaire using a 7-point Likert scale
|
At 2 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Responses to the caregiver questionnaire completed at the end of the study using a 7-point Likert scale
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
The satisfaction questionnaire using a 7-point Likert scale
|
At 2 months
|
|
Patient use of the MyDerm solution
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
A. Number of patients with at least one telefile B. Total number of teledeposits generated per patient during the follow-up period C. Number of teledeposits per week per patient over the entire follow-up period (evolution of usage over the follow-up period)
|
At 2 months
|
|
The impact of patients' socio-demographic characteristics on use of the MyDerm solution
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
Number of patients with at least one telefile
|
At 2 months
|
|
The impact of patients' socio-demographic characteristics on use of the MyDerm solution
Time Frame: AT 2 months
|
Total number of teledeposits generated per patient during follow-up period
|
AT 2 months
|
|
The impact of patients' socio-demographic characteristics on use of the MyDerm solution
Time Frame: AT 2 months
|
Number of teledeposits per week per patient over the entire follow-up period (evolution of usage over the follow-up period)
|
AT 2 months
|
|
Use of PIXACARE solution by caregivers
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
Number of telemonitoring records opened per patient by the medical team during the follow-up period.
|
At 2 months
|
|
Use of PIXACARE solution by caregivers
Time Frame: AT 2 months
|
Total number of alerts and number of alerts per patient during follow-up period
|
AT 2 months
|
|
Use of PIXACARE solution by caregivers
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
Number of actions by telephone related to an alert
|
At 2 months
|
|
Use of PIXACARE solution by caregivers
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
Number of e-mail related to an alert
|
At 2 months
|
|
Use of PIXACARE solution by caregivers
Time Frame: AT 2 months
|
Number of organization of a physical consultation related to an alert
|
AT 2 months
|
|
Use of PIXACARE solution by caregivers
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
Number of organization of a teleconsultation
|
At 2 months
|
|
Use of PIXACARE solution by caregivers
Time Frame: At 2 months
|
Number of hospitalization related to an alert
|
At 2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024/001/Pixacare
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Wound
-
University Hospital, IoanninaCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Lower Limb Wound | Upper Limb WoundGreece
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedBurn Scar | Burns | Lower Limb Injury | Lower Limb WoundTurkey
-
Abeer MusaddiqCompletedOpen Wound of Lower LimbPakistan
-
University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity Hospital, Caen; Beziers Hospital; Rangueil HospitalTerminatedIschemic Wound of the Lower Limb | Necrotic Arterial WoundsFrance
-
University of Nevada, Las VegasUnited States Department of Defense; National Institutes of Health (NIH); University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation at Hip (Injury)United States
-
Sint MaartenskliniekCompletedLower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeNetherlands
-
Campus Bio-Medico UniversityFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee | Lower Limb Amputation Above KneeItaly
-
Otto Bock France SNCRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee | Lower Limb Amputation Above KneeFrance
-
Tezel Yıldırım ŞahanCompletedValidity and Reliability of The 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in Individuals With Lower Limb AmputationLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeTurkey
-
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHHanger Clinic: Prosthetics & OrthoticsActive, not recruitingLower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Congenital Amputation of Lower LimbUnited States