Improving Access to Renal Transplantation for Underserved Black Communities (AATAP)

May 6, 2025 updated by: Daniela Ladner, Northwestern University

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the African American Transplant Access Program can be successfully replicated at another large kidney transplant program. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the AATAP intervention increase the number of Black patients who are listed for kidney transplant? Does the AATAP intervention have an effect on Black patient self-efficacy and trust in care team?

Researchers will compare kidney transplant listing status after 12 months of patients in the AATAP intervention to usual care patients to see if the AATAP program increases the number of patients listed for transplant.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Tampa General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • self-identify as Black or African American;
  • 18 to 75 years of age
  • have an eGFR < 20 or End Stage Renal Disease Diagnosis;
  • screen positive for AATAP via the screener (for poor health literacy or poor medical adherence or psychosocial concerns);
  • medically eligible to begin transplant evaluation process determined by transplant team

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other racial groups
  • participants who have previously received a transplant;
  • pregnant women;
  • participants who screen negative on the screener;
  • children less than 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AATAP (intervention) Arm
One clinic visit with all transplant providers, racially concordant care team, dedicated social worked. This will incorporate: Cultural congruency, trust, health literacy and psychological support. Questionnaires also to be administered
AATAP is a program created to address the barriers that Black patients face when accessing transplantation. AATAP providers resources in cultural congruency, trust, psychosocial support, and health literacy to provide patients with the individualized support needed to access the kidney transplant waitlist
No Intervention: Standard of Care (Control) Arm
Separate visits with nephologist, surgeons and social worker. This arm will follow common standard of care at the site. Questionnaires also to be administered

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Listing status for each Arm by month 12
Time Frame: 12 months from time of enrollment
Listing (active or inactive) status by month 12
12 months from time of enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 1.2 Global Health Scale
Time Frame: at enrollment and at 12 months after enrollment

Scoring/T-Score Metric: The T-score metric is standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. This means a T-score of 50 represents the average score of the reference population, and each 10-point deviation represents one standard deviation above or below the mean.

Minimum and Maximum Values: The T-score typically ranges from 20 to 80, though this can vary slightly depending on the specific population and scoring method used.

Interpretation: Higher T-scores indicate better health outcomes, while lower T-scores indicate worse health outcomes.

at enrollment and at 12 months after enrollment
Self-Efficacy in Kidney Dialysis Management using Perceived Kidney/Dialysis Self-Management Scale (PKDSMS)
Time Frame: at enrollment and at 12 months after enrollment

Scoring: The PKDSMS uses an average score on a five-point Likert scale, where respondents rate their self-management abilities.

Minimum and Maximum Values: The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating low self-efficacy and 5 indicating high self-efficacy.

Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better self-management and higher confidence in managing kidney dialysis.

at enrollment and at 12 months after enrollment
trust in care received by transplant team using Adapted Trust in Physicians Scale
Time Frame: at enrollment and at 12 months after enrollment

Scoring: This scale typically uses a five-point Likert format, where respondents rate their level of agreement with various statements about their trust in their physicians. The response options range from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".

Minimum and Maximum Values: The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating low trust and 5 indicating high trust.

Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater trust in the transplant team, while lower scores indicate less trust.

at enrollment and at 12 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniela Ladner, MD, MPH, FACS, FAST, Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplant

Clinical Trials on AATAP intervention

Subscribe