Ultrasound Evaluation of Two Anatomic Landmarks in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: the Posterior Superior Iliac Spine VS Iliac Crest (USPSISICL)

Ultrasound Evaluation Of Two Anatomic Landmarks In Spinal Anesthesia For Cesarean Section: The Posterior Superior Iliac Spine vs Iliac Crest

Intercristal line as palpation landmarks to identifying the vertebral level is frequently inaccurate.To find more safe and reliable body surface markers and convenient methods to be solved in clinical work.The investigators performed a two-stage study to evaluated the accuracy of intercristal line and the The Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS) line to identify the lumbar interspinous spaces for spinal anesthesia using ultrasonography in pregnant woman which will provide a second option.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators performed a two-stage study to evaluated the accuracy of Intercristal line and the PSIS line to identify the lumbar intervertebral space for spinal anesthesia using ultrasonography in pregnant woman. In phase 1, the distances between the PSIS line and each lumbar interspinous space is measured by ultrasound,and the mean and 95% confidence interval of distances in pregnant women with different height ranges were calculated to provide a reference for identifying specific lumbar spaces.In phase 2, a further 230 participants were received the PSIS, Intercristal line or both as palpation landmarks to define specific lumbar spaces.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

660

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

We enrolled parturients aged 22-45 years at 37-42 weeks of gestation scheduled for epidural or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (for labor or cesarean section)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • After obtaining written informed consents,pregnant women at 37-42 weeks of gestation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI ≥ 40 kg/m² (to minimize palpation variability), History of lumbar surgery/deformity (scoliosis, spondylolisthesis or osteoporotic vertebral collapse), Inability to maintain the flexed lateral decubitus position, Participant withdrawal, Unforeseen anatomical anomalies discovered during screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
T group
The intercristal line-based palpation protocol followed the rule described by Kim et al[19], with minor modifications to accommodate the flexed lateral decubitus position: Select the interspinous space that is either intersected by the intercristal line or lies immediately below it.
P group
The PSIS line-based palpation protocol stipulated targeting the L3/4 interspinous space within the an interval using hierarchical rules: single spaces are labeled L3/4; for two spaces, L3/4 is the intercristal line-intersected one (or lower if neither); for rare three spaces, the lowest is L3/4
Group M

Based on an interim analysis of Phase 1 data, we established the following decision protocol for L3/4 interspinous space localization:

  1. PI ≥9 cm: Select the interspace at or immediately below the PI line.
  2. PI ≤7 cm: Select the interspace at or immediately above the PI line.
  3. PI 7-9 cm: Apply a 6.5-10 cm target window from the PSIS point.

    • If one interspace lies within this window, select it.
    • If multiple interspaces are present, choose the most caudal one.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The distance between the PSIS line and each mid-interspinous space
Time Frame: three days
PSIS line was defined as an intercristal line drawn between the the final posterior superior iliac spine point.Use a ruler to measure the distance between the PSIS line and each midddle- interspinous space (L1/2 through L5/S1)and record. The mean of distances and 95% confidence interval are calculated.
three days
The accuracy of the anatomic landmarks to determine the L3/4 interspinous space
Time Frame: three days
The L3-L4 intervertebral space was detected using intercristal line and the PSIS line in a random order by 2 experienced anesthesiologists. After determining the L3-L4 intervertebral space using each method alternately, horizontal skin marks were created with an erasable pen. Then, another experienced anesthesiologist for ultrasonographic examination assessed the intervertebral spaces.After identifying the sacrum, the investigator moved the probe in a cephalad direction, counted the intervertebral spaces and assessed the actual intervertebral spaces of the 2 skin marks.
three days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
baseline data
Time Frame: three days
The age
three days
baseline data
Time Frame: three days
body mass index (BMI)
three days
baseline data
Time Frame: three days
waist circumference
three days
baseline data
Time Frame: three days
the gestational weeks
three days
The distance between the palpated intercristal line and PSIS line
Time Frame: three days

palpated intercristal line line was identified and marked by bilateral palpation of the iliac crest summits.

Subsequently, two reference points were defined: "point PSIS" (intersection of the PSIS line with the spinal midline) and "point PI" (intersection of the PI line with the spinal midline). We then calculated the following three distances: the "L3/4 distance" (from the L3/4 interspinous space midpoint to point PSIS), the "PI distance" (from point PI to point PSIS) The experienced anesthesiologist for ultrasonographic examination assessed the actual interspinous space of the intercristal line.

three days
Maternal height
Time Frame: three days
Maternal height
three days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Souping Wang, PhD, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 23, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonography

Subscribe