Comparing TRIple Rectal Ultrasound Imaging Technology in Ulcerative Colitis (TRINITY)

Comparing Three Modalities (Trans Abdominal, Trans-perineal and Endoscopic Ultrasound) of Ultrasonography for Rectal Imaging in Ulcerative Colitis: The TRINITY Study

This study aims to evaluate the correlation of rectal wall thickness and vascularity measurements using trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAS), trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The primary objective is to correlate rectal total wall thickness measured by TPUS with EUS, while secondary objectives include correlating rectal wall thickness and vascularity as measured by TAS, TPUS, and EUS, with endoscopic and histologic activity. Additionally, the study will assess changes in patient management following EUS/sigmoidoscopy compared to TAS/TPUS alone. Consecutive UC patients attending an IBD clinic will undergo clinical assessment using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) followed by TAS and TPUS as point-of-care tests. If clinically indicated, patients will also undergo sigmoidoscopy and EUS during the same visit, with measurements compared and correlated to histologic inflammation and fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels when available. This cross-sectional study will include a follow-up period until biopsy results are obtained, with a recruitment duration of 6-12 months and a target sample size of 170 patients (60 patients with mid-end ultrasound machine, rest with high-end ultrasound machine for transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is designed to assess the correlation of rectal wall thickness and vascularity measurements obtained through trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAS), trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The primary goal is to determine how well rectal total wall thickness measured via TPUS correlates with EUS findings. Secondary objectives include comparing rectal wall thickness and vascularity measured by TAS, TPUS, and EUS with endoscopic activity, histologic activity, and fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate changes in patient management resulting from additional investigations, such as sigmoidoscopy and EUS, over the standard TAS and TPUS procedures. UC patients attending an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinic will undergo a clinical assessment using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), followed by baseline TAS and TPUS, both performed as point-of-care tests. If deemed clinically necessary, patients will also undergo sigmoidoscopy and EUS during the same visit, with rectal wall thickness and vascularity measured across different rectal sections and correlated with histologic inflammation assessed via biopsy and measured by the Nancy histologic index. The study will also explore correlations with FCP levels where data are available. This cross-sectional study includes a follow-up period until biopsy results are obtained, with an estimated recruitment duration of 6-12 months and a target sample size of 50 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hyderabad, India
        • Asian Institute Of Gastroenterology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (18-75 years) with Ulcerative colitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Lactating mother
  • Endoscopy not required
  • No consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Adult patients with Ulcerative colitis
Adult patients (18-75 years) with Ulcerative colitis Pregnant, lactating and acute severe colitis excluded
If sigmoidoscopy is warranted as per clinical indication, the consenting patients shall undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) using a radial echo-endoscope during the same sitting of sigmoidoscopy without incurring any additional cost to the patient. Total rectal wall thickness in anterior and posterior wall shall be measured in upper, middle and lower rectum with assessment of vascularity (Modified Limberg scale). The maximal wall thickness including maximum mucosal and submucosal thickness shall be noted and compared to total wall thickness measured by transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) and Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). On sigmoidoscopy, rectal inflammation shall be measured by ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) in rectum. Biopsy seal be taken as standard protocol to document histologic inflammation (measured by Nancy histologic index) which is known to predict future risk of relapse.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Wall thickness (in mm) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Wall thickness (in mm) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis
Baseline
Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound vascularity in predicting histologic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Vascularity grades (modified Limberg scale: score 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in ulcerative colitis
Baseline
Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound vascularity in predicting histologic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Vascularity grades (modified Limberg score: 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by transperineal ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in ulcerative colitis
Baseline
Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Wall thickness (in mm) measured by transperineal ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis
Baseline
Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound in predicting histlogic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Wall thickness (in mm) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis
Baseline
Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound vascularity in predicting endoscopic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Vascularity grades (modified Limberg score: 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis
Baseline
Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound vascularity in predicting endoscopic remission
Time Frame: Baseline
Vascularity grades (modified Limberg score: 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by transperineal ultrasound in predicting endoscopioc remission in ulcerative colitis
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Ultrasound

Subscribe