Clinical and Functional Characteristics of Patients Admitted for Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia (EQOL-COVID)

Evolution of Quality of Life, Functional Capacity, Nutritional Status and Return to Work Activity in Patients Admitted for Severe Pneumonia Due to COVID 19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

This research protocol aims to evaluate the impact of severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional capacity, muscle strength, and nutritional status one year after discharge from the ICU. The study is analytical, longitudinal, and prospective, involving patients over 18 years who received IMV for more than 72 hours and were discharged alive. Primary outcomes include changes in HRQoL (assessed using EQ-5D-3L and VAS), functional capacity (Katz Index and Timed Up and Go test), muscle strength (MRC scale), and nutritional status (BMI and limb circumferences). Secondary outcomes include time to return to work and one-year mortality. Data collection occurs at discharge and at one, six, and twelve months post-discharge. Statistical analyses involve descriptive statistics and longitudinal comparisons using Friedman and Dunn-Bonferroni tests. Ethical approval has been secured, and patient anonymity will be ensured. The protocol emphasizes multidisciplinary follow-up to identify and address physical and psychological sequelae effectively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of severe COVID-19 pneumonia on patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for more than 72 hours. Specifically, it examines health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional capacity, muscle strength, nutritional status, and work reintegration at various time points up to one year after ICU discharge. Additionally, it assesses one-year post-hospital discharge mortality and the time required for patients to return to work.

The study employs a prospective, longitudinal design, following a cohort of patients aged 18 years and older discharged alive from the ICU. Participants were selected based on strict inclusion criteria, such as confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia requiring IMV for over 72 hours and the ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria included cognitive impairment, prior tracheostomy, or pre-existing indications for home mechanical ventilation. The population was evaluated across four defined time points: before hospital discharge (Visit 0), at one month (Visit 1), at six months (Visit 2), and at one year post-discharge (Visit 3).

Clinical, demographic, and functional data were collected through validated tools. HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L index and visual analog scale (VAS), while functional capacity was measured with the Katz Index and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Muscle strength was evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, and nutritional status was determined through BMI and anthropometric measurements, including arm, waist, and calf circumferences. Additional data included work reintegration and mortality outcomes, tracked through patient interviews and medical records.

Data analysis employed robust statistical methods to identify trends and differences across time points. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic and baseline clinical characteristics. Longitudinal comparisons were conducted using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman tests, with post-hoc analysis (Bonferroni or Dunn-Bonferroni) to evaluate significant pairwise differences. For comparisons involving only two time points, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used as appropriate. All analyses adhered to a significance threshold of p < 0.05, and data visualization was performed using SPSS and R software packages.

Ethical considerations were rigorously maintained. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Nacional Prof. Alejandro Posadas, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Patient anonymity was preserved using unique coded identifiers, and all procedures complied with established guidelines for research integrity and participant safety.

Preliminary results indicate significant improvements in HRQoL, functional capacity, and muscle strength over the one-year follow-up period. However, persistent challenges such as delayed work reintegration and moderate mortality rates highlight the complex recovery trajectory of critically ill COVID-19 survivors. This study underscores the importance of structured, multidisciplinary follow-up programs to address the physical, nutritional, and psychosocial needs of this vulnerable population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires
      • Haedo, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1706
        • Ladislao Diaz Ballve

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

During the period between June and December 2020, all patients who were discharged alive from the ICU, were referred to the general hospitalization ward and were discharged from hospital were included

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • discharged alive from the ICU
  • over 18 years of age
  • diagnosis of admission or reason for hospitalization in the ICU of pneumonia due to COVID-19, all had to have confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 as a causative agent by a positive result of a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay with nasopharyngeal swab samples or tracheal aspirated respiratory airway sample.
  • have received invasive mechanical ventilatory assistance for more than 72 hours
  • the patient or a close family member had agreed to participate in the study by signing the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients in jail at the time of admission to the ICU.
  • history of dementia or cognitive impairment.
  • those who already had a previous tracheostomy for any reason
  • prior to admission to the ICU indication of prolonged mechanical ventilation at home or in a chronic care institution

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Follow up cohort
Discharged alive from the ICU and admitted to the follow-up program. Programed scheduled visits, which included an evaluation at one month, six months, and one year after hospital discharge
The EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS questionnaires, administered at all visits, evaluated five dimensions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses generated a Health Status sequence and calculated the EQ-5D-3L Index. A visual analogue scale (VAS) rated health from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Functional capacity was assessed using the Katz Index (IK) and Timed Up and Go (TUG), which measured the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, and return. Anthropometric variables, measured by the same researcher (LP) at 1 month and 1 year, included limb circumferences using specific techniques. Muscle strength, evaluated with the EF-MRC scale, involved verbal commands for movement tests. Calf circumference was measured on the largest circumference area. Living conditions and work reintegration were recorded. Health issues detected during follow-up were referred to the clinic's coordinating physician for appropriate care.
Other Names:
  • EuroQol-5D VAS (Analog visual scale)
  • Medical Reseacrh Council Strength Scale
  • Katz index for functional independence
  • Timed Up to Go test
  • Waist Circunference
  • Brachial Circumference
  • Calf Circumference

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: 1 year

The percentage of change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be measured. This is a multidimensional concept that assesses the physical, psychological and social aspects of an individual's well-being, specifically as it is influenced by their health status.

This study assesses health-related quality of life using the EuroQol-5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-3L includes a descriptive system that covers five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Unit of measurement: EQ-5D-3L Index: a calculated score derived from the descriptive system that reflects overall health-related quality of life.

EQ-5D VAS: a self-reported numerical score that represents perceived health status.

1 year
Functional capacity
Time Frame: 1 year

Measured through The Katz Index assesses functional independence in six basic activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding.

Unit of Measure: Score on the Katz Index (range 0-6, where 6 indicates full independence).

Outcome Measure 2: Functional Mobility - Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test The TUG test measures functional mobility by recording the time (in seconds) it takes for a participant to stand from a seated position, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down.

Unit of Measure:

Time in seconds.

Time Frame:

Assessed at three time points: at one month, at six months, and one year post-discharge (not applicable before hospital discharge as participants may not be ambulatory).

1 year
Functional capacity
Time Frame: 1 year

Measured through Time up to go (TUG) test. The TUG test measures functional mobility by recording the time (in seconds) it takes for a participant to stand from a seated position, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down.

Unit of Measure: Time in seconds. The Katz Index assesses functional independence in six basic activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding.

Unit of Measure: Score on the Katz Index (range 0-6, where 6 indicates full independence).

1 year
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 1 year

Measured through Medical Research Council (MRC) Strength Scale: The MRC Strength Scale evaluates muscle strength across six muscle groups in both upper and lower limbs. Each group is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal strength), with a total score ranging from 0 to 60.

Unit of Measure:

Total score on the MRC Strength Scale (range 0-60, where higher scores indicate better muscle strength).

1 year
Anthropometric variables - Body mass index
Time Frame: 1 year

current Weight in kilograms (kg) and Height in meters (m) for calculation of body mass index (BMI). BMI is calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²).

Unit of Measure: BMI in kg/m².

1 year
Anthropometric variables -
Time Frame: 1 year

WC is measured using a non-stretchable measuring tape at the midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest.

Unit of Measure: Circumference in centimeters (cm).

1 year
Anthropometric variables - Arm Circumference (AC)
Time Frame: 1 year
AC is measured at the midpoint between the acromion and the olecranon. Unit of Measure: Circumference in centimeters (cm).
1 year
Anthropometric variables - Calf Circumference (CC)
Time Frame: 1 year
CC is measured at the point of maximum circumference of the calf. Unit of Measure: Circumference in centimeters (cm).
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients who returned to work
Time Frame: 1 year

patients who had stated that they had been working prior to hospitalization were asked about the return to work.

Unit of Measure: Number of participants (count).

1 year
Number of Participants Who Died During the One-Year Follow-Up
Time Frame: 1 year

Mortality was determined by reviewing medical records and contacting patients or their families if they missed a scheduled clinic visit. The reason for non-attendance was investigated, and deaths were recorded when confirmed.

Unit of Measure: Number of participants (count).

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after finalization

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

contact principal investigator via e-mail

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) with EQ-5D-3L

Subscribe