Management of Ventilation Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter Organisms in a Pediatric Center

December 17, 2024 updated by: Hasnaa Osama, Beni-Suef University

Management of Ventilation Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter Organisms in a Pediatric Center: a Randomized Controlled Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the most effective empirical therapy of antibiotics for better ventilator-associated pneumonia control. The main question it aims to answer is:

• Which is better for clinical response single or combination empiric antibiotic therapies ?

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at Cairo University's Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

-Patients ranging from one month to twelve years old, who had been undergoing mechanical ventilation for over 48 hours and were diagnosed with Ventillator Associated Pneumonia.

2.1.3. Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with pneumonia prior to mechanical ventilation initiation.
  • Patients who had been intubated for more than 24 hours before admission to the PICU, or those transferred from other PICUs and were already receiving antibiotic therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: extended meropenem infusion in combination with other options
a) Patients treatment was modified to extended meropenem infusion in combination with other options such as Polymyxin, Tigecycline, Ertapenem, or Amikacin
In the case of XDR or PDR Pseudomonas spp. or Acinetobacter spp. isolation from the patient's specimen, treatment was adjusted to extended meropenem infusion in combination with other options such as Polymyxin, Tigecycline, Ertapenem, or Amikacin in group (A) of patients.
Active Comparator: two β-lactam antibiotics plus a single non-β-lactam antibiotic
b) Patient treatment was adjusted to include two β-lactam antibiotics plus a single non-β-lactam antibiotic, or a combination of double β-lactam antibiotics, with the aim of avoiding aggressive and toxic antibiotics
In the case of XDR or PDR Pseudomonas spp. or Acinetobacter spp. isolation from the patient's specimen, treatment was adjusted to include two β-lactam antibiotics plus a single non-β-lactam antibiotic, or a combination of double β-lactam antibiotics, with the aim of avoiding aggressive and toxic antibiotics in group (B) of patients
Other: c) Patients treatment was adjusted to the second-line empirical antibiotic
c) Control group in which patients treatment was adjusted to the second-line empirical anti-biotic according to the hospital's local policy.
Treatment was adjusted to the second-line empirical antibiotic according to the hospital's local policy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Time Frame: 7 days
Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed through Kirby-Bauer's disc diffusion method (DD), Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) using the automated VITEK 2 compact system (bioMérieux, France), and the Ameri-Ziaei Double Antibiotic Synergism Test (AZDAST). Interpretation of DD and MIC results followed CLSI guidelines.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventilation Acquired Pneumonia

Subscribe