Effect of Acetylcysteine Inhalation on Incidence and Time to Develop Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients

May 10, 2026 updated by: Sarah Rabie Mohamed Adly

The Role of N-Acetylcysteine Inhalation in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Background Mechanical ventilation is an essential medical intervention in the context of critical illness. However, the intervention is associated with a risk of significant, potentially preventable complications. Among these are ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, atelectasis, and pulmonary edema.

Ventilator-associated complications commonly increase morbidity and mortality. They may also prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the hospital or the intensive care unit, with increased health care costs; so safe, effective therapeutic and preventative strategies are essential to attenuate poor outcomes from ventilator-associated events.

Secretion retention and ineffective cough play a significant role in failed extubation and weaning from ventilator; the presence of the artificial airway, poor humidification of inspired gases, and immobility are the major causes of pulmonary secretion retention in this population. Accumulated secretion in the airways, if extensive, starts a self-sustaining cycle of ventilation/perfusion mismatch, gas-exchange impairment, increased work of breathing.

For decades N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) has been used for its mucolytic properties orally in different respiratory diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and cystic fibrosis (CF); but its effects are not known if given by nebulization through endotracheal tube (ETT), studies to date have provided inconclusive results. Despite this uncertainty, mucoactive agents are still used in adult ICUs.

NAC is usually administered orally, with several formulations and dosage forms available for both short- and long-term treatment of respiratory diseases. The inhalation route might also be considered a practical option, with recent interest, as the therapeutic drug acts directly on the bronchial mucosa, promotes continuous local retention of the drug, prolongs anti-inflammatory effects, and avoids the liver first-pass effect, which can help quickly improve airway inflammation.

Contrary to other mucoactive drugs, NAC has been found to exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antibiofilm activities.

In the respiratory infection field, the available data indicate that NAC was associated with inhibition of oxidative stress and reduced the inflammatory factors in community acquired pneumonia, antibiofilm activity specially in pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in pre-clinical and clinical reports and has good antibacterial properties and suggested to interfere with biofilm formation and disruption.

NAC has shown improvement in the respiratory index (PaO₂/FiO₂), with lower rates of mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. When studied in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is associated with oxidative stress, increased levels of glutathione, and inflammation, NAC demonstrated improvements in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and PaO₂/FiO₂.

N-Acetylcysteine contributed to delaying ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients when administered orally as a preventive medication. It was also effective in attenuating the decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) in mild to moderate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and it showed a lower rate of postoperative pulmonary complications when given pre-operatively in orthotopic liver transplantation.

Since NAC is relatively low-cost, readily available, and has a favorable side effect profile, it is important to properly assess the clinical benefits of nebulized NAC as an adjunct to standard medical treatments in mechanically ventilated patients.

Aim of the study

This study will assess the role of preventive N-acetylcysteine inhalation on incidence and time to develop VAP in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.

Objectives

  • 1) Assessment of N-acetylcysteine inhalation efficacy in mechanically ventilated patients through monitoring the following parameters: time to develop ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), incidence of VAP, PaO₂/FiO₂, pH, oxygen saturation (SaO₂), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), frequency of endotracheal tube (ETT) suction and tube exchange, and infection parameters (total leukocyte count, body temperature). In addition, hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), ventilator-free days, and the length of hospital and ICU stay
  • 2) Assessment of the safety of N-acetylcysteine inhalation in mechanically ventilated patients by monitoring the incidence of new-onset bronchospasm

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18-64 years, either male or female.
  2. Critically ill patients who have undergone intubation and are on mechanical ventilation.
  3. Expected duration of mechanical ventilation of more than 48 hours.
  4. Provided consent to participate in this clinical trial by next of kin.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients currently on long-term NAC treatment.
  2. Confirmed brain death.
  3. Recent chest infection.
  4. Immunocompromised patients on immunosuppressive medication.
  5. Patients mechanically ventilated in another hospital.
  6. Pregnant women.
  7. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) <60 mmHg despite adequate resuscitation and vasopressor therapy at the time of randomization.
  8. Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to study medication.
  9. Presence of a condition or abnormality that would compromise the quality of the data.

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 40 adults patients receiving normal saline 0.9% inhalation every 12hrs
40 adult mechanically ventilated patients will receive normal saline nebulizer every 12 hours
Experimental: 40 adult patients will recieve acetyl cysteine 10% nebulizer every 12 hrs
40 adult mechanically ventilated patients will receive acetyl cysteine nebulizer 10% every 12 hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary endpoint of interest is incidence and time to develop ventilator associated pneumonia.
Time Frame: participant will be followed up for 10 days post mechanical ventilation or till extubation (whichever occurs first).
  1. Incidence of VAP will be expressed as percentage of patients who developed VAP.
  2. Time to develop VAP is expressed in days
participant will be followed up for 10 days post mechanical ventilation or till extubation (whichever occurs first).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1) Infection parameters (TLC,Temperature °C) 2)Change in P/F ratio 3) Duration of mechanical ventilation expressed in days 3) Day 3 ETT aspirate culture positivity 4) Number of endotracheal tube exchange and suctioning episodes per ventilator day.
Time Frame: participant will be followed up for 10 days post mechanical ventilation or till extubation (whichever occurs first)
  1. Change in infection parameter TLC (×10⁹/L), CRP (mg/L), body temperature (°C) from base line to day 10 post intubation or till extubation
  2. Change in (P/F ratio measured in mmHg) from baseline to day 10 post intubation or till extubation
  3. Positive vs negative ETA culture
participant will be followed up for 10 days post mechanical ventilation or till extubation (whichever occurs first)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventilation Acquired Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Normal (0.9%) saline

Subscribe