Spinal Stimulation for Upper Extremity Recovery in the Home (SURe)

March 26, 2026 updated by: Candace Tefertiller, Craig Hospital

Spinal Stimulation to Improve Upper Extremity Recovery in the Home (SSTIM UE Recover [SURe])

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of non-invasive spinal stimulation used in the home and/or community in combination with a functional home exercise program for the upper extremities (arm/hand function) as well as their combined impacts on changes in upper extremity function. The expected duration of participation in this study is about 31-33 hours over a 13-25-week period. Enrollees in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) upper extremity functional task-specific training combined with non-invasive transcutaneous spinal stimulation, or 2) waitlist control, which involves the same intervention, but with a 12-week delayed start. Participants complete initial testing (one time if in group one and three times [at weeks 0, 8, and 12] if in group two), 24 1-hour training sessions (2x/week in home with caregiver/companion support and 1x/week with research team in person or via video conference for 8 weeks), a post-treatment evaluation, and a final evaluation (4 weeks after post-treatment).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
        • Recruiting
        • Craig Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Candy Tefertiller, PT, DPT, PhD, NCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • History of traumatic SCI
  • Less than 12 months post SCI
  • SCI injury level C1-C8
  • SCI categorized as AIS B-D
  • Have passive range of motion (ROM) within functional limits at wrists, shoulders, and elbows
  • Have caregiver support to attend three in-person sessions and ongoing training at home
  • Have a caregiver who, in the judgment of the research team, is qualified to assist the participant in the safe use of TSS
  • Able to complete in-person training sessions and return to Craig Hospital for assessments
  • Experience no complicating physical or cognitive conditions as determined by their physician that would preclude the safe use of electrical stimulation
  • If using prescribed anti-spasticity medications, must be at a stable dose for at least four weeks prior to starting study procedures
  • Agrees to comply with investigational devices instructions for use, protocol visits, and return of the device
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Experience unstable chronic cardiac or respiratory complaints
  • Have a recent history of fracture, contractures, or skin pressure injuries that might interfere with the intervention
  • Received Botox injections to the UEs, neck, or hands within the last three months
  • Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or currently breastfeeding
  • Have breakdown in skin area that will come into contact with electrodes
  • Prior nerve or tendon transfer procedure for the UEs
  • Concurrently are participating in another drug or device trial that may interfere with this study
  • Have an implanted pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, deep brain stimulator, or intrathecal pump
  • In the opinion of the investigators, the study is not safe or appropriate for the participant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Waitlist Control

The waitlist control group will participate in a protocol similar to the immediate intervention group, except:

  • 12-week waiting period before starting the active intervention.
  • Assessments will be completed at 0, 8, and 12 weeks before starting the active intervention to control for spontaneous recovery.
  • Post-treatment evaluation (after eight weeks of training)
  • Follow-up assessment (four weeks after the post-treatment evaluation).
Participants will engage in a home exercise therapy program in combination with transcutaneous spinal stimulation intended to focus on the upper extremities that commences 12 weeks after enrollment.
Active Comparator: Immediate Intervention

For the immediate intervention group, each participant will complete the following:

  • Initial baseline evaluation
  • 24 training sessions (3x/week for eight weeks) of UE Functional Task Practice (FTP)+TSS (two training sessions/week will be completed in the home with caregiver/companion support; the third weekly session will be conducted via videoconference with a research therapist)
  • Post-treatment evaluation (after eight weeks of training) and follow-up evaluation (four weeks after post-treatment evaluation).
  • Post-treatment and follow-up assessments will be conducted over two days: assessments completed without TSS on day one and with TSS on day two.
Participants will engage in a home exercise therapy program in combination with transcutaneous spinal stimulation intended to focus on the upper extremities that commences immediately after enrollment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE-Q)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
The CUE-Q version 2.1 measures functional limitation and perceived difficulty of performing actions with upper extremities in individuals with tetraplegia. The CUE-Q has 32 items; each scored on a 1-to-7-point scale representing self-perceived difficulty with total scores ranging from 32 to 224 (higher scores demonstrating greater UE function) and right and left scores assessed separately
Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Graded Refined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
This multimodal test measures sensorimotor and prehension function in three domains important in describing arm and hand function
Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
Pinch and Grasp Force
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
Pinch and grasp force will be measured by the Commander Echo Console with the JTech Pinch and Hand Dynamometer to quantify finger and grasp strength.
Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
Global Rating of Change (GRC)
Time Frame: Weeks 8, 12, 21, and 25
The GRC assesses perceived change from an intervention. The scale is designed to quantify an individual's perceived improvement or deterioration over time. The magnitude of the change is then scored on a visual analog scale. GRC scales have been recommended for use as a core outcome measure in rehabilitation studies to improve the applicability of information from clinical trials to clinical practice.
Weeks 8, 12, 21, and 25
Qualitative Questions
Time Frame: Weeks 8 and 21
Participants and caregivers will be asked questions regarding their experience during the intervention, such as their likes and dislikes, notable changes or observations, and overall satisfaction with using TSS in their homes
Weeks 8 and 21
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
The COPM is an individualized, client-centered instrument designed to measure an individual's self-perception of physical functioning and satisfaction in the activities identified as important by the client. The COPM will directly assess the true importance of functional improvements with regard to the subject's ability to perform activities of daily living and/or to function occupationally.
Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
The ISNCSCI is a universal classification tool for SCI based on a standardized sensory and motor exam. The ISNCSCI involves a detailed examination to determine the sensory and motor levels for both the right and left sides, the overall neurological level of the injury, and the completeness of the injury as designated by the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS). The motor exam also results in a total Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) ranging from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicative of greater UE strength.
Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
Satisfaction with Treatment Scale
Time Frame: Weeks 8, 12, 21, and 25
The Satisfaction with Treatment Scale is a 6-point scale (0=strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree) used to rate satisfaction with treatment in previous intervention studies conducted in the home environment85 and will be modified specifically to address the transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) intervention.
Weeks 8, 12, 21, and 25
International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set (QoL-BDS) Version 2.0
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
This instrument measures self-reported quality of life across four domains: overall well-being, physical health, psychological health, and social life. For each domain, respondents are asked to rate their satisfaction on a 0-10 scale (0=completely dissatisfied; 10=completely satisfied).
Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) Version 3.0
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25
This instrument identifies pain region, pain type (e.g., nociceptive, neuropathic), and treatments used to reduce pain in addition to pain intensity on a 0-10 scale (0=no pain; 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) and interference with various aspects of the respondent's life on a 0-10 scale (0=no interference; 10=extreme interference).
Weeks 0, 8, 12, 21, and 25

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic Information
Time Frame: Week 0
Demographic information will include: age, sex, race/ethnic background, pre-injury education, employment status, marital status, and living situation.
Week 0
Injury Characteristics
Time Frame: Week 0
Injury information will include: date of injury, cause of injury, baseline AIS classification, and injury level.
Week 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Immediate Intervention

Subscribe