Dental Injury Related To Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy (dentalinjury)

January 13, 2025 updated by: FUNDA ARUN, Selcuk University

Frequency And Level Of Dental Injury Related To Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study

This research explores the occurrence of minor dental injuries and their associated effects by employing the transillumination technique with a cold light source. Unlike traditional methods primarily concentrating on major traumas detectable through standard laryngoscopy, this study aims to shed light on the subtler yet potentially impactful dental traumas that may otherwise go unnoticed. Through this innovative approach, investigators hope to gain deeper insights into the nuances of dental damage and its implications for oral health.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to investigate especially minor dental traumas and associated damages instead of major traumas that can be directly seen due to conventional laryngoscopy using transillumination technique with cold light source.

After the approval of the Selcuk University Local Institutional Ethics Committee (2017/05), 300 ASA I-III adult patients who underwent elective surgical operations under general anesthesia and underwent endotracheal intubation were included in this prospective, double-blinded study. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient during the preoperative anesthetic evaluation.

During the preoperative anesthetic evaluation, an anesthetist and dentist in the study team performed a detailed oral physical examination on all study patients. Demographic data such as age, gender, body weight, height, data related to airway management such as mallampati score, thromental distance, mouth opening size, and information about past anesthesia history, including previously described difficult intubation and medical condition, were questioned, and recorded. During a dental examination, all teeth, but particularly anterior 6 of maxillary and mandibular teeth, were examined regarding general dental hygiene and the existence of any missing teeth, tooth decay, plaque and stone formation, discoloration, gum problems such as recession and gingivitis, and tooth trauma. The patients with the presence of deformation due to a trauma or a congenital abnormality in the maxilla-fascial region, a swinging tooth, and a history of previous surgical operation regarding the maxilla-fascial region and oral cavity were not included in the study.

All patients were subjected to the same anesthetic process. None of the patients were given anesthetic premedication on the day of surgery. Anesthesia induction was achieved with 2.0 mg.kg-1 iv propofol, 2.0 mg.kg-1 iv fentanyl, and 0.6 mg.kg-1 iv rocuronium after routine monitoring with ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, and SpO2. Each patient was ventilated with a face mask with 100% O2 for 2-3 minutes and intubated with a proper endotracheal tube by the same anesthetist using a conventional laryngoscope. All intubations were achieved by anesthesiologists with different statuses (senior assistants and consultants who were blind to the study). After the endotracheal intubation, the anesthesiologist included in the study recorded the data about intubation and airway management such as Cormack-Lehane Score, laryngoscope blade type and size, difficulty in intubation, use of additional devices such as oral airway, intubating supraglottic airway device, video laryngoscope, and intubating guide in the airway management, and the number of intubating attempts by asking the practitioner.

The intraoperative dental evaluation was performed using a transillumination technique with a cold light source at two different time points: T1: Before anesthesia induction, and T2: After endotracheal intubation, before the start of the surgical operation. The same dentist performed all dental evaluations. Although all teeth were evaluated, the evaluation with the cold light source was particularly for every six teeth in the lower and upper jaws.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Konya, Turkey, 42130
        • Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

ASA I_III patients intubated by direct laryngoscopy under general anesthesia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I,II,III
  • Intubated by direct laringscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • deformation due to a trauma or a congenital abnormality in the maxilla-fascial region
  • a swinging tooth
  • history of previous surgical operations regarding the maxilla-fascial region

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
intubated
intubated by direkt laryngoscopy under general anesthesia
endotracheal intubation by using direct laryngoscopy
Other Names:
  • endotracheal intubation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
dental injury
Time Frame: 1 year
frequency of dental injury due to direct laryngoscopy
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Funda Arun, Asst. Prof., Selcuk University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to private conditions, we do not plan to share IPD with other researchers. This decision is based on data confidentiality, participant privacy, and compliance with ethical and regulatory guidelines. While IPD sharing is not part of our plan, we are open to providing aggregate data or summary results if you'd like to.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubated Patients

Clinical Trials on intubated general anesthesia with propofol IV, rocuronium IV ,sevoflurane and N2O gas

Subscribe