Implant Placement Depth and Peri-Implant Tissue Outcomes

April 14, 2026 updated by: Juan Carlos Bernabeu Mira, University of Valencia

Influence of Implant Placement Depth (-2 mm vs -4 mm Subcrestal) on Peri-implant Tissue Conditions: a Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol

The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the influence of subcrestal implant placement depth (-2 mm vs -4 mm) on peri-implant marginal bone level changes, including marginal bone loss and bone remodeling. Secondary outcomes include implant success, peri-implant probing depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BoP).

Partially edentulous patients requiring fixed implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation with two implants in posterior maxillary or mandibular regions will be included. Implants will be placed subcrestally at either -2 mm or -4 mm from the bone crest, following a submerged healing protocol. Allocation to insertion depth will be randomized. Marginal bone level changes will be assessed using standardized periapical radiographs at second-stage surgery, prosthesis placement, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after functional loading. PPD and BoP will be recorded at the same time points.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Juan Carlos Bernabeu Mira, DDS, MSc, PhD
  • Phone Number: +34 697348312
  • Email: juan.c.bernabeu@uv.es

Study Locations

    • Valencia
      • Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46003
        • University of Valencia
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥18 years old with partial edentulism.
  • Need for rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prostheses in posterior regions.
  • Availability of minimum bone height for implants ≥6 mm in length.
  • Minimum bone width without the need for guided bone regeneration.
  • Supracrestal soft tissue thickness ≥2 mm.
  • Non-smokers or smokers of ≤10 cigarettes/day.
  • Plaque index and bleeding on probing <20%.
  • Probing depth ≤3 mm.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic diseases contraindicating implant surgery.
  • Treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates.
  • Head and neck radiotherapy.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Alcohol or drug use.
  • Psychiatric disorders.
  • Need for bone regeneration procedures.
  • Inability to complete follow-up.
  • Implant failure during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: -2 mm subcrestal implant placement with 2-mm slim transmucosal abutments
Participants in this group will receive implants placed 2 mm below the level of the alveolar bone crest. Implants will share the same design, surface characteristics, and prosthetic connection, including platform switching. Slim transmucosal abutments with a height of 2-mm will be placed according to the subcrestal depth to ensure an adequate transmucosal profile and a stable relationship between the implant, peri-implant soft tissues, and the prosthetic restoration
Participants will receive bone-level dental implants placed subcrestally at either -2 mm or -4 mm below the bone crest in healed posterior sites of the maxilla or mandible, according to randomization. Implant placement will follow the manufacturer's drilling protocol, achieving a final insertion torque of at least 35 Ncm. A transmucosal abutment will be connected at the time of surgery, with height selected based on implant placement depth (2-3 mm for -2 mm placement and 4-5 mm for -4 mm placement). The abutment will be tightened to a final torque of at least 30 Ncm following a one abutment-one time protocol.
Experimental: -2 mm subcrestal implant placement with 3-mm slim transmucosal abutments
Participants in this group will receive implants placed 2 mm below the level of the alveolar bone crest. Implants will share the same design, surface characteristics, and prosthetic connection, including platform switching. Slim transmucosal abutments with a height of 3-mm will be placed according to the subcrestal depth to ensure an adequate transmucosal profile and a stable relationship between the implant, peri-implant soft tissues, and the prosthetic restoration.
Participants will receive bone-level dental implants placed subcrestally at either -2 mm or -4 mm below the bone crest in healed posterior sites of the maxilla or mandible, according to randomization. Implant placement will follow the manufacturer's drilling protocol, achieving a final insertion torque of at least 35 Ncm. A transmucosal abutment will be connected at the time of surgery, with height selected based on implant placement depth (2-3 mm for -2 mm placement and 4-5 mm for -4 mm placement). The abutment will be tightened to a final torque of at least 30 Ncm following a one abutment-one time protocol.
Experimental: -4 mm subcrestal implant placement with 4-mm slim transmucosal abutments
Participants in this group will receive implants placed 4 mm below the level of the alveolar bone crest. Implants will share the same design, surface characteristics, and prosthetic connection, including platform switching. Slim transmucosal abutments with a height of 4-mm will be placed according to the subcrestal depth to ensure an adequate transmucosal profile and a stable relationship between the implant, peri-implant soft tissues, and the prosthetic restoration.
Participants will receive bone-level dental implants placed subcrestally at either -2 mm or -4 mm below the bone crest in healed posterior sites of the maxilla or mandible, according to randomization. Implant placement will follow the manufacturer's drilling protocol, achieving a final insertion torque of at least 35 Ncm. A transmucosal abutment will be connected at the time of surgery, with height selected based on implant placement depth (2-3 mm for -2 mm placement and 4-5 mm for -4 mm placement). The abutment will be tightened to a final torque of at least 30 Ncm following a one abutment-one time protocol.
Experimental: -4 mm subcrestal implant placement with 5-mm slim transmucosal abutments
Participants in this group will receive implants placed 4 mm below the level of the alveolar bone crest. Implants will share the same design, surface characteristics, and prosthetic connection, including platform switching. Slim transmucosal abutments with a height of 5-mm will be placed according to the subcrestal depth to ensure an adequate transmucosal profile and a stable relationship between the implant, peri-implant soft tissues, and the prosthetic restoration.
Participants will receive bone-level dental implants placed subcrestally at either -2 mm or -4 mm below the bone crest in healed posterior sites of the maxilla or mandible, according to randomization. Implant placement will follow the manufacturer's drilling protocol, achieving a final insertion torque of at least 35 Ncm. A transmucosal abutment will be connected at the time of surgery, with height selected based on implant placement depth (2-3 mm for -2 mm placement and 4-5 mm for -4 mm placement). The abutment will be tightened to a final torque of at least 30 Ncm following a one abutment-one time protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in peri-implant marginal bone level (mm)
Time Frame: From abutment placement (baseline time [TB]), 1 month post (T1), and at 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months after definitive prosthesis placement.
Parallelized periapical radiographs will be obtained and a calibrated digital tool will be used to determine the vertical distance from the implant-abutment junction to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal sides. Unit of measure: Milimeters (mm)
From abutment placement (baseline time [TB]), 1 month post (T1), and at 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months after definitive prosthesis placement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peri-implant probing depth (mm)
Time Frame: 1 month post-op (T1), and at months 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) after definitive prosthesis placement.
Peri-implant soft tissue condition will be assessed by recording PPD using a periodontal probe at six surfaces per implant (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and the corresponding lingual/palatal sites) to calculate the mean of every implant. Unit of measure: Milimeters (mm)
1 month post-op (T1), and at months 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) after definitive prosthesis placement.
Bleeding on probing (presence/absence)
Time Frame: 1 month post-op (T1), and at months 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) after definitive prosthesis placement.
Bleeding on probing will be measured by gently passing a periodontal probe (using ~20-25g of force) to the base of the sulcus/pocket of the prosthesis at six surfaces per implant (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and the corresponding lingual/palatal sites), then waiting 30 seconds to observe bleeding. It will be recorded as a dichotomous score (yes/no). Unit of measure: Percentage of sites showing bleeding per implant.
1 month post-op (T1), and at months 3 (T3) (prosthetic loading) , 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) after definitive prosthesis placement.
Implant success
Time Frame: From the time of surgery through the end of the 12-month follow-up period after definitive prosthesis placement.
Assessment of the implants will be performed by categorizing them into: success (optimal health), satisfactory survival, compromised survival, or failure.
From the time of surgery through the end of the 12-month follow-up period after definitive prosthesis placement.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline characteristics
Time Frame: At enrollment time.
Baseline variables will be collected for descriptive purposes and will not be combined into a single outcome measure. These include: age (years); sex (male/female); smoking habit (non-smoker or ≤10 cigarettes/day); brushing frequency (0, 1-2, or 3 times/day); edentulism type (interdental or free end); periodontal phenotype (thin or thick); antagonist type (natural teeth, tooth-supported bridge, implant-supported prosthesis, or removable prosthesis); cause of tooth loss (caries, periodontitis, or fracture); implant location (arch and quadrant); and soft tissue thickness (mm).
At enrollment time.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana Verónica Blanco Besteiro, DDS, MSc and PhD candidate, University of Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 20, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UV-INV-ETICA-3792383

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The plan to share individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been determined.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Marginal Bone Loss

Clinical Trials on Subcrestal Implant Placement with Transmucosal Abutment and One Abutment-One Time Protocol

Subscribe