SPIC Frequency After Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis

December 31, 2024 updated by: Giacomo Baima, University of Turin, Italy

Supportive Peri-implant Care Frequency After Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis - a Multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial

The leading hypothesis behind this study is that a 3-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) recalls after surgical therapy of implants affected by severe peri-implantitis yields better results when compared to a 6-month frequency. Thus, the primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to compare 2 different frequencies of SPIC recalls (3 and 6 months) after surgical treatment of severe peri-implantitis in terms of treatment success (absence of implant loss, probing pocket depth (PPD) ≤ 5 mm at all aspects, bleeding on deep probing ≤1 site/implant, no suppuration at all aspects, bone loss <0.5 mm) at early follow-up (1-year) and implant survival at the 5-year examination. Secondarily, this randomized clinical trial aims to assess the effects of the 2 different frequencies over clinical attachment levels around remaining teeth.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

152

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Any patient aged 18 years or more, who has at least one implant affected by severe peri-implantitis, and able to sign an informed consent form will be potentially eligible for this trial. Severe peri-implantitis will be defined as the presence of a peri-implant probing pocket depth [PPD] ≥ 6 mm in at least 1 site of the implant, bleeding and/or suppuration on deep probing [dBoP and/or dSoP, respectively] and radiographically documented marginal bone loss > 3 mm (Carcuac et al. 2016; Romandini et al. 2022) on implants in function by at least 12-months. In the absence of baseline radiographs, implants had to present a bone level >3 mm (Romandini et al. 2021b).

Patients fulfilling the above-mentioned inclusion criteria will not be included in the study if they appear to be unable to attend the study-related procedures (including the long-term follow-up visits) or if one or more of the following systemic or local exclusion criteria are detected during the enrolment phase.

Systemic primary exclusion criteria:

  • systemic diseases (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus) or chronic use of medications (e.g. corticosteroids, bisphosphonates) likely to influence the outcome of therapy or which contraindicates the study procedures;
  • smoking >10 cigarettes;
  • pregnant or nursing women.

Local primary exclusion criteria:

  • history of peri-implantitis treatment on the eligible implants in the previous 6 months;
  • hopeless implants (>80% of bone loss/level).

A secondary inclusion criterion will be applied 1-month after surgery:

- absence of peri-implant abscess on the implants to be included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)
SPIC provided at a 3-month frequency starting from the 1-month re-evaluation after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
SPIC including update on smoking status, evaluation of the patient's adherence to self-performed oral hygiene procedures, full-mouth supra-gingival instrumentation around teeth, repeated sub-gingival instrumentation on sites presenting a PPD >4 mm with BoP/SoP or a PPD≥6 mm, supra-marginal instrumentation around implants, using an erythritol air abrasive system and interdental brushes, sub-marginal instrumentation on implants with BoP after deep probing by an erythritol air abrasive system and/or ultrasonic scaler provided at a 3-month frequency after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
Active Comparator: 6-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)
SPIC provided at a 6-month frequency starting from the 1-month re-evaluation after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
SPIC including update on smoking status, evaluation of the patient's adherence to self-performed oral hygiene procedures, full-mouth supra-gingival instrumentation around teeth, repeated sub-gingival instrumentation on sites presenting a PPD >4 mm with BoP/SoP or a PPD≥6 mm, supra-marginal instrumentation around implants, using an erythritol air abrasive system and interdental brushes, sub-marginal instrumentation on implants with BoP after deep probing by an erythritol air abrasive system and/or ultrasonic scaler provided at a 6-month frequency after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment success - criterion 1 (yes/no)
Time Frame: 1 year
Absence of implant loss, probing pocket depth ≤ 5 mm at all aspects, deep bleeding/suppuration on probing ≤1 site/implant, bone loss <0.5 mm
1 year
Implant loss (yes/no)
Time Frame: 5 years
Implant removed, or mobile, or radiographic evidence of complete loss of osseointegration.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant loss (yes/no)
Time Frame: 1 and 3 years
Implant removed, or mobile, or radiographic evidence of complete loss of osseointegration.
1 and 3 years
Treatment success - criterion 1
Time Frame: 3 and 5 years
Absence of implant loss, probing pocket depth ≤ 5 mm at all aspects, deep bleeding/suppuration on probing ≤1 site/implant, bone loss <0.5 mm
3 and 5 years
Treatment success - criterion 2 (yes/no)
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 5 years
Absence of: implant loss, bone loss >1 mm and surgical re-treatments.
1, 3, and 5 years
Plaque presence (yes/no)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Presence of plaque (binary - presence/absence in at least 1 site)
1, 3 and 5 years
Plaque extent
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Plaque extent (continuous - number of sites per implant: 0-6 sites)
1, 3 and 5 years
Probing pocket depth (mm)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Probing pocket depth (continuous - assessed at the deepest site per implant)
1, 3 and 5 years
Bleeding on deep probing (yes/no)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Bleeding on deep probing (binary - presence/absence in at least 1 site)
1, 3 and 5 years
Soft-tissue level margin (mm)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Peri-implant soft-tissue margin level from a constant fixed reference point (continuous - greatest implant level increase among the 6 sites)
1, 3 and 5 years
Keratinised mucosa height (mm)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Keratinized mucosa height (continuous - midbuccal aspect)
1, 3 and 5 years
Bleeding on superficial probing
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Bleeding on superficial circumferential probing (categorical - highest implant level value: 0=no sBoP, 1= isolated bleeding spots; 2=confluent red line on margin; 3=heavy or profuse bleeding)
1, 3 and 5 years
Suppuration (yes/no)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Suppuration on deep probing (binary - presence/absence in at least 1 site).
1, 3 and 5 years
Modified Bleeding Index
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Modified Bleeding Index after profound probing (categorical - highest implant level value: 0=no dBoP; 1=isolated bleeding spots; 2=confluent red line on margin; 3=heavy or profuse bleeding)
1, 3 and 5 years
Radiographic outcomes
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 years
Taking into account the worst site-specific (between mesial and distal) change: bone level change, bone gain >0.5 mm, bone loss >0.5 mm.
1, 3 and 5 years
Patient- and clinician- esthetic appreciation
Time Frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Assessment on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) of both patient- and clinician- esthetic appreciation and overall patient satisfaction.
Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Total SPIC duration (months)
Time Frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Total supportive peri-implant care duration in months , number of sub-marginal re-instrumentations at study implants during SPIC appointments, compliance to SPIC regimen, number of surgical retreatments, and rate of adverse events
Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Number of sub-marginal re-instrumentations at study implants
Time Frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Number of sub-marginal re-instrumentations at study implants during SPIC appointments
Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Compliance to SPIC regimen (yes/no)
Time Frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Compliance to SPIC regimen according to patient randomisation
Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Number of surgical retreatments
Time Frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Number of surgical retreatments performed on the study implant during the study time
Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Rate of adverse events
Time Frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Rate of adverse events occurred during the study time, both dependent and independent of the study procedures
Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years
Full-mouth plaque score (0-100)
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 5 years
A full-mouth periodontal examination around the remaining dentition (6 sites per tooth/implant) will be performed assessing plaque (presence/absence)
1, 3, and 5 years
Full-mouth bleeding score (0-100)
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 5 years
A full-mouth periodontal examination around the remaining dentition (6 sites per tooth/implant) will be performed assessing Bleeding on Probing (presence/absence),
1, 3, and 5 years
Clinical attachment level around remaining teeth
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 5 years
Probing pocket depth (PPD) and recession (REC) (negative values when the CEJ is located subgingivally, positive otherwise). Clinical attachment levels (CAL) will be calculated by summing PPD and REC values for each site. Patient-level incidence of clinical attachment loss >2 mm around teeth will be evaluated as a further outcome.
1, 3, and 5 years
Chairside aMMP-8 assay (positive/negative)
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 5 years
Chairside active matrix metalloprotease-8 (aMMP-8) assay will be conducted at the study implant site. Positivity will be determined using a threshold value of ≥20 ng/mL.
1, 3, and 5 years
Molecular analysis in the peri-implant crevicular fluid
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years
Cytokines expressed in the peri-implant crevicular fluid will be monitored as additional outcomes to study the mechanistic interplays involved in the potential different clinical response between groups.
1 month, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years
Microbiological analysis
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years
Shotgun metagenomics will be used to monitor the microbiological profile associated to the clinical condition.
1 month, 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SPIC Multi-center

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis

Clinical Trials on 3-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

Subscribe