Efficacy and Usability of the EXPLORER Exoskeleton in Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Natural Environments

September 22, 2025 updated by: MarsiBionics

Efficacy and Usability of the EXPLORER Exoskeleton in Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Their Natural Environment

Neurodevelopmental disorders often lead to abnormal development of the Central Nervous System (CNS), frequently causing motor dysfunctions such as an inability to stand and walk. EXPLORER is a robotic gait exoskeleton designed to rehabilitate children with motor disabilities in home and outdoor environments.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and usability of EXPLORER in children with motor disability within their natural settings, including home and community environments.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neurodevelopmental disorders often lead to abnormal development of the Central Nervous System (CNS), frequently causing motor dysfunctions such as an inability to stand and walk. Robotic devices are a useful tool in the rehabilitation of these children, but most of them are designed to be used in the clinical setting. EXPLORER is a robotic device designed to assist gait in children with motor disability in their homes and the community. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and usability of EXPLORER in children with motor disability within their natural settings, including home and community environments.

An initial session will be conducted in the participant's natural environment, during which the researchers will instruct the primary caregivers on the use of the device. Subsequently, the device will be left for a two-month period for use in the natural settings deemed appropriate by the family.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 28922
        • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28009
        • Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús-Servicio de Neuro Ortopedia
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital Universitario Gregorio Maranon
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28009
        • Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús - Servicio de Rehabilitación
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of any pathology or condition causing neurodevelopmental disorders.
  • Ability to continuously use the device for two weeks, at least 3 times per week, without causing excessive fatigue that would prevent the participant from carrying out their usual activities.
  • Availability and commitment from the family to use the device at least 3 times per week during the planned period, in different environments and with various objectives.
  • Medical authorization for standing, gait training and weight bearing.
  • Informed consent signed by legal guardians.
  • Maximum user weight of 60 kg.
  • Hip width (between greater trochanters) ≤37 cm.
  • Length of the thigh (distance from the greater trochanter to the lateral condyle of the tibia) from 21cm to 36cm.
  • Tibia leg length (distance from the lateral condyle of the tibia to the lateral malleolus) from 20cm to 35cm.
  • Shoe size ≤40 (EU)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical contraindications for standing or walking.
  • Non-reducible contractures or heterotropic ossifications above the degrees allowed by the device or out of the trajectory imposed by the device
  • Spasticity equal to 4 on the Modified Ashworth Scale at the time of use of the device.
  • More than 20º of hip and/or knee non-reducible contractures at the time of using the exoskeleton.
  • Necessity to walk with more than 5º of hip abduction.
  • Impossibility to reach 5º of ankle dorsiflexion with ir without orthoses.
  • Lower length dysmetria that cannot be mitigated with a wedge under the foot.
  • Skin lesion on parts of the lower extremities that are in contact with the device.
  • History of fracture without trauma.
  • Presence of other conditions causing exercise intolerance (such as uncontrolled hypertension, coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, severe pulmonary disease).
  • Conductual disorders that may interfere with the use of the device or their participation in the study, like impulsiveness.
  • Allergy to any of the EXPLORER materials: cotton, nylon, polyester, PPS, PEEK or ABS.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EXPLORER
Two-week period with the robotics gait device for use in the natural settings deemed appropriate by the family.
Two-week period with the robotics gait device for use in the natural settings deemed appropriate by the family.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
occurrence of any serious adverse event to the participant or the caregiver
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Falls prevalence
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
Number of falling events occurred from the participant or caregiver
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Skin integrity
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
Occurrence of any injury of the skin in the areas of contact and produced by the use of the device
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Pain (Visual Analogic Scale)
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
pain measured by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) by the participant and the caregiver, scored from 0 to 10, being 0 "no pain" and 10 "unbearable pain"
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Donning and doffing time
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
Time to don and doff the device to each participant
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Device usage time
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
Time using the device
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Number of steps
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
number of steps with the device
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Usage modes
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
two different usage modes (active and automatic).
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Speed
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
speed achieved with the device (steps per minute)
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Device accessibility
Time Frame: through study completion, along 2 weeks
Environments where the device has been used and level of accessibility in each environment measured with a 5 points Likert scale (0 not accessible - 5 very accessible)
through study completion, along 2 weeks
Range of motion
Time Frame: Before starting the intervention (S1) and after completing the two weeks of use
Passive Degree to which a joint can move (hip, knee, and ankle joints in both legs). From 0º to 180º.
Before starting the intervention (S1) and after completing the two weeks of use
Participation
Time Frame: Before starting the intervention (S1) and after completing the two weeks of use

Measured with the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation. 20 ordinal scaled items across 4 subsections.

Maximum total score is 80 (20 items x 4) and the minimum total score is 20 (20 items x 1)

Before starting the intervention (S1) and after completing the two weeks of use

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QUEST
Time Frame: at the end of the intervention
Using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) questionnaire administered to the participants' caregivers at the end of the intervention. The QUEST 2.0 scale has 12 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale
at the end of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Clinical Trials on EXPLORER

Subscribe