- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06770946
The Effect of Amniotic Membrane Application on Post-Cesarean Wound Healing and Cosmetic Outcomes (Amniotic Membr)
The Effect of Amniotic Membrane Application on Post-Cesarean Wound Healing and Cosmetic Outcomes: a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of amniotic membrane application during cesarean delivery in reducing post-surgical complications and improving wound healing and cosmetic outcomes in women aged 18-40 undergoing their first cesarean section. The primary questions this study aims to answer are:
- Compared to standard care, Does the amniotic membrane reduce surgical site infections and wound dehiscence?
- Does the amniotic membrane improve patient satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes?
Participants were randomized into two groups: the intervention group received an amniotic membrane application over the cesarean incision site, while the control group underwent cesarean delivery without membrane application. Outcomes were assessed at predefined postoperative intervals, focusing on wound healing, pain levels, and cosmetic satisfaction.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of amniotic membrane application in reducing post-cesarean complications, including surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and scar formation. The trial also assesses its impact on pain management and cosmetic outcomes in women aged 18-40 undergoing their first cesarean section. The study was conducted between May 2022 and May 2023 at Van Regional Training and Research Hospital.
The amniotic membrane, the innermost layer of the placenta, has regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. Its application during cesarean delivery may offer a cost-effective and autologous intervention to enhance surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Objectives:
Primary Objectives:
- Evaluate whether the amniotic membrane reduces surgical complications, including infections, hematoma, and wound dehiscence.
- Investigate its role in preventing hypertrophic scars and keloids.
Secondary Objectives:
- Assess the effect of amniotic membrane application on postoperative pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
- Measure patient satisfaction with cosmetic results using the Modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale.
Methodology:
A total of 372 participants were enrolled and randomized into two groups (1:1 ratio) using block randomization to ensure balanced allocation. The intervention group received an amniotic membrane, harvested intraoperatively from the placenta and applied directly to the cesarean incision site before closure. The control group underwent cesarean delivery without membrane application. Both groups were blinded to their assignments, and standard postoperative wound care was provided.
Participants were evaluated at multiple predefined postoperative time points (days 1, 2, 7, 40, and 6 months) for surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, scar/keloid formation, pain levels, and cosmetic satisfaction.
Significance:
This study provides evidence supporting the use of autologous amniotic membranes in obstetrics, potentially establishing a low-cost, accessible method to improve surgical outcomes and patient quality of life. If successful, these findings may have broader implications for other surgical fields and high-risk patient populations.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Van, Turkey, 65090
- Van Regional Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female participants aged 18-40 years. Undergoing their first cesarean section. Term pregnancies (≥37 weeks of gestation). Elective cesarean delivery performed under spinal anesthesia. Use of the Pfannenstiel incision method. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of previous abdominal surgeries. Presence of chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or vascular diseases.
Pulmonary conditions or collagen tissue disorders affecting wound healing. Signs of infection during delivery. Use of medications or therapies that impair wound healing (e.g., corticosteroids, immunosuppressants).
Known hypersensitivity to materials or methods used in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Amniotic Membrane Group
Participants in this arm received an amniotic membrane application directly to the cesarean incision site during surgery.
The membrane was harvested intraoperatively from the placenta and placed over the incision area before closure.
It was removed 24 hours postoperatively, followed by standard postoperative wound care.
|
Amniotic Membrane Application: This intervention involves the application of an amniotic membrane harvested intraoperatively from the fetal side of the placenta during cesarean delivery. The membrane is placed directly on the incision site before surgical closure to promote wound healing and reduce complications such as infection, dehiscence, and scarring. The membrane is removed 24 hours postoperatively, and standard wound care is continued thereafter. |
|
No Intervention: Control Group (No Intervention)
Participants in this arm underwent standard cesarean delivery without the application of an amniotic membrane.
Standard postoperative wound care was provided without any additional intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.
|
Description: The presence of surgical site infections diagnosed based on erythema, induration, tenderness, and purulent discharge. Scale: Binary (Yes/No) |
Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.
|
|
Wound Dehiscence
Time Frame: Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.
|
Description: The occurrence of wound dehiscence defined as a wound gap of less than 1 cm in depth. Scale: Binary (Yes/No). |
Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.
|
|
Scar/Keloid Formation
Time Frame: Time Frame: At 40 days and 6 months post-surgery.
|
Description: The presence of hypertrophic scars or keloids assessed visually.
Scale: Binary (Yes/No).
|
Time Frame: At 40 days and 6 months post-surgery.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain (VAS Score)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Postoperative days 1 and 2.
|
Description: Pain scores measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Scale: 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain).
|
Time Frame: Postoperative days 1 and 2.
|
|
Cosmetic Satisfaction
Time Frame: Time Frame: At 40 days post-surgery.
|
Description: Patient-reported satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the incision site, measured using the Modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale. Scale: 0 to 6 (higher scores indicate better cosmetic outcomes). |
Time Frame: At 40 days post-surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022/22-05
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedPregnancy | Cesarean Section | Elective Cesarean SectionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Ataturk UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial ThicknessTurkey
-
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical UniversityCenter for Perinatology and Pediatric Surgery, Almaty, Kazakhstan; Zhalyn Scientific...RecruitingSkin Wound Healing After Cesarean Section | Cesarean Section Scar HealingKazakhstan
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Chiayi Christian HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, BordeauxMinistry of Health, FranceRecruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedCesarean SectionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Amniotic Membrane Application
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedBiological DressingsKorea, Republic of
-
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbHTechnische Universität DresdenCompletedCorneal Ulcers | Corneal MeltingGermany
-
Red de Terapia CelularUniversidad de Murcia; Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca; MurciaSalud and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakUnknown
-
Recibio, Inc.Duke UniversityCompletedPregnancy Related | Cesarean Wound Disruption | Cesarean Section; InfectionUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityNot yet recruiting
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknownUlcer | Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica, RecessiveFrance
-
University of UtahNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)CompletedAtrial FibrillationUnited States
-
National University of Ireland, Galway, IrelandHealth Research Board, IrelandUnknownPregnancy Related | Pregnancy, Prolonged | Induced; Birth