The Effect of Amniotic Membrane Application on Post-Cesarean Wound Healing and Cosmetic Outcomes (Amniotic Membr)

January 7, 2025 updated by: Izzet Celegen, Yuzuncu Yıl University

The Effect of Amniotic Membrane Application on Post-Cesarean Wound Healing and Cosmetic Outcomes: a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of amniotic membrane application during cesarean delivery in reducing post-surgical complications and improving wound healing and cosmetic outcomes in women aged 18-40 undergoing their first cesarean section. The primary questions this study aims to answer are:

  1. Compared to standard care, Does the amniotic membrane reduce surgical site infections and wound dehiscence?
  2. Does the amniotic membrane improve patient satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes?

Participants were randomized into two groups: the intervention group received an amniotic membrane application over the cesarean incision site, while the control group underwent cesarean delivery without membrane application. Outcomes were assessed at predefined postoperative intervals, focusing on wound healing, pain levels, and cosmetic satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of amniotic membrane application in reducing post-cesarean complications, including surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and scar formation. The trial also assesses its impact on pain management and cosmetic outcomes in women aged 18-40 undergoing their first cesarean section. The study was conducted between May 2022 and May 2023 at Van Regional Training and Research Hospital.

The amniotic membrane, the innermost layer of the placenta, has regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. Its application during cesarean delivery may offer a cost-effective and autologous intervention to enhance surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Objectives:

Primary Objectives:

  1. Evaluate whether the amniotic membrane reduces surgical complications, including infections, hematoma, and wound dehiscence.
  2. Investigate its role in preventing hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. Assess the effect of amniotic membrane application on postoperative pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
  2. Measure patient satisfaction with cosmetic results using the Modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale.

Methodology:

A total of 372 participants were enrolled and randomized into two groups (1:1 ratio) using block randomization to ensure balanced allocation. The intervention group received an amniotic membrane, harvested intraoperatively from the placenta and applied directly to the cesarean incision site before closure. The control group underwent cesarean delivery without membrane application. Both groups were blinded to their assignments, and standard postoperative wound care was provided.

Participants were evaluated at multiple predefined postoperative time points (days 1, 2, 7, 40, and 6 months) for surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, scar/keloid formation, pain levels, and cosmetic satisfaction.

Significance:

This study provides evidence supporting the use of autologous amniotic membranes in obstetrics, potentially establishing a low-cost, accessible method to improve surgical outcomes and patient quality of life. If successful, these findings may have broader implications for other surgical fields and high-risk patient populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

372

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Van, Turkey, 65090
        • Van Regional Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female participants aged 18-40 years. Undergoing their first cesarean section. Term pregnancies (≥37 weeks of gestation). Elective cesarean delivery performed under spinal anesthesia. Use of the Pfannenstiel incision method. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous abdominal surgeries. Presence of chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or vascular diseases.

Pulmonary conditions or collagen tissue disorders affecting wound healing. Signs of infection during delivery. Use of medications or therapies that impair wound healing (e.g., corticosteroids, immunosuppressants).

Known hypersensitivity to materials or methods used in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Amniotic Membrane Group
Participants in this arm received an amniotic membrane application directly to the cesarean incision site during surgery. The membrane was harvested intraoperatively from the placenta and placed over the incision area before closure. It was removed 24 hours postoperatively, followed by standard postoperative wound care.

Amniotic Membrane Application:

This intervention involves the application of an amniotic membrane harvested intraoperatively from the fetal side of the placenta during cesarean delivery. The membrane is placed directly on the incision site before surgical closure to promote wound healing and reduce complications such as infection, dehiscence, and scarring. The membrane is removed 24 hours postoperatively, and standard wound care is continued thereafter.

No Intervention: Control Group (No Intervention)
Participants in this arm underwent standard cesarean delivery without the application of an amniotic membrane. Standard postoperative wound care was provided without any additional intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.

Description: The presence of surgical site infections diagnosed based on erythema, induration, tenderness, and purulent discharge.

Scale: Binary (Yes/No)

Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.
Wound Dehiscence
Time Frame: Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.

Description: The occurrence of wound dehiscence defined as a wound gap of less than 1 cm in depth.

Scale: Binary (Yes/No).

Time Frame: Within 7 days post-surgery.
Scar/Keloid Formation
Time Frame: Time Frame: At 40 days and 6 months post-surgery.
Description: The presence of hypertrophic scars or keloids assessed visually. Scale: Binary (Yes/No).
Time Frame: At 40 days and 6 months post-surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain (VAS Score)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Postoperative days 1 and 2.
Description: Pain scores measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scale: 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain).
Time Frame: Postoperative days 1 and 2.
Cosmetic Satisfaction
Time Frame: Time Frame: At 40 days post-surgery.

Description: Patient-reported satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the incision site, measured using the Modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale.

Scale: 0 to 6 (higher scores indicate better cosmetic outcomes).

Time Frame: At 40 days post-surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Plan to Share IPD: No Plan Description: Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional data-sharing policies and privacy concerns.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on Amniotic Membrane Application

Subscribe