Assessment of Shoulder Rehabilitation Practices and Documentation Protocols at Riphah Rehabilitation Center

January 10, 2025 updated by: Riphah International University

Assessment of Shoulder Rehabilitation Practices and Documentation Protocols at Rphah Rehabilitation Center, Lahore A Comprehensive Analysis

This study aims to evaluate Riphah Rehabilitation Center's shoulder rehabilitation procedures and documentation guidelines. The study will specifically assess the efficacy of shoulder rehabilitation procedures, their methodology, and the techniques employed to record patient improvement. In order to make sure the centre adheres to best practices, improves patient care, and keeps accurate records for better treatment outcomes, the study intends to identify areas of strength and potential improvements in both the rehabilitation techniques and documentation processes. The evaluation's findings will improve the center's operational effectiveness and clinical practices.

Target Audience:Healthcare Professionals (such as physicians, physiotherapists, and rehabilitation therapists): This study will assist guide evidence-based strategies for managing shoulder injuries and offer insights into contemporary rehabilitation procedures.

Centre Administration: For better patient care, resource management, and operational efficiency, the results will point out areas where documentation and treatment protocols should be strengthened.

Patients and Families: In the end, the study will improve rehabilitation results, increasing the likelihood that patients will heal from shoulder injuries more quickly and completely.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lahore, Pakistan, 54840
        • Riphah Rehabilitation Center
    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Riphah Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients Undergoing Shoulder Rehabilitation:

Include patients who have undergone or are currently undergoing rehabilitation specifically for shoulder injuries, conditions, or surgeries.

Consider both inpatients and outpatients receiving rehabilitation services at Rphah Rehabilitation Center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing shoulder rehabilitation at Rphah Rehabilitation Center.
  • Rehabilitation protocols implemented within the center.
  • Documented cases with sufficient information for analysis.
  • Both acute and chronic shoulder conditions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with shoulder conditions not requiring rehabilitation.
  • Cases lacking adequate documentation.
  • Rehabilitation protocols not specific to shoulder conditions.
  • Patients with comorbidities significantly affecting rehabilitation outcomes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
GROUP A:Rehabilitation Practices Group:

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and quality of shoulder rehabilitation practices.

Data Collection, Observation of rehabilitation sessions: Record types of exercises, therapy techniques, patient engagement, and therapist-patient interactions.

Interviews with rehabilitation professionals: Gather insights into their approaches, challenges faced, and perceived effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies.

Analysis:

Assess adherence to established rehabilitation protocols. Evaluate patient outcomes such as pain levels, range of motion, and functional status.

Compare observed practices with evidence-based guidelines for shoulder rehabilitation.

Findings:

Identify strengths and weaknesses in current rehabilitation practices. Highlight areas where improvements or modifications may be necessary.

Evidence-Based Training Program:Develop a structured training program for rehabilitation professionals focusing on evidence-based shoulder rehabilitation practices.

Clinical Mentorship and Supervision:Implement a mentorship program where experienced rehabilitation professionals provide guidance and support to junior staff members.

Standardization of Rehabilitation Protocols:Review and standardize rehabilitation protocols for common shoulder conditions based on current evidence and best practices.

Patient-Centered Care Approach:Adopt a patient-centered approach to shoulder rehabilitation, emphasizing shared decision-making and individualized treatment plans Outcome Monitoring and Quality Improvement:Use standardized outcome measures to evaluate improvements in pain, function, range of motion, and patient satisfaction.

GROUP B:Documentation Protocols Group

Objective: Assess the completeness, accuracy, and organization of documentation related to shoulder rehabilitation.

Data Collection:

Review of patient records and documentation: Evaluate the quality and consistency of documentation practices, including initial evaluations, progress notes, and discharge summaries.

Interviews with rehabilitation staff: Collect feedback on documentation protocols, challenges encountered, and perceived adequacy of documentation practices.

Analysis:

Assess the clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation. Evaluate adherence to documentation protocols and standards. Identify any deficiencies or inconsistencies in documentation practices.

Findings:

Highlight strengths and weaknesses in current documentation protocols. Identify areas for improvement, such as standardizing documentation templates or providing training on effective documentation practices.

Recommendations:

Propose strategies to enhance documentation quality and consistency.

Training and Education Program:Develop and implement a training program for rehabilitation professionals aimed at enhancing their knowledge and skills in shoulder rehabilitation practices and documentation protocols.

Standardization of Protocols:Review and update existing rehabilitation protocols to ensure alignment with current evidence-based guidelines and best practices.

Quality Assurance Measures:Establish a system for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of shoulder rehabilitation practices and documentation protocols.

Patient Education and Engagement:Develop educational materials and resources for patients undergoing shoulder rehabilitation to enhance their understanding of treatment goals, exercises, and self-management strategies.

Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation:Implement a system for monitoring and evaluating patient outcomes, including pain levels, range of motion, functional status, and satisfaction with rehabilitation services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Severity During Shoulder Rehabilitation Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (post-intervention)

Pain severity will be assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Both groups will receive 2 treatment sessions per week. Pain assessments will be made at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the 4-week intervention (post-intervention) to evaluate changes in pain severity.

Measurement Unit: Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), where 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain.

Baseline and 4 weeks (post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Hashim, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation Practices Group

Subscribe