Building Evidence for Ablative Internal Radiation Therapy in Localized HCC Beyond the Up-To-7 Criteria (BEAT-UT7)

June 16, 2025 updated by: Jin Woo Choi, Seoul National University Hospital

Building Evidence for Ablative Internal Radiation Therapy Using Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres in Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond the Up-To-7 Criteria

At four major centers in Korea, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that exceed the up-to-7 criteria yet remain locally confined will undergo ablative radioembolization using Yttrium-90 glass microspheres, guided by a standardized dosimetry method. Their treatment response, survival outcomes, and adverse events will be monitored for two years following the procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This prospective, multi-center, open-label, single-arm, phase II clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ablative radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that exceeds the up-to-seven (UT7) criteria but is confined to up to five geographically adjacent Couinaud segments. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate, assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST).

All patients will receive ablative radioembolization using Yttrium-90 glass microspheres with a personalized dosimetry approach targeting a tumor dose of 700 Gy (±50%). In cases of high tumor burden, a second radioembolization within 180 days of the initial procedure will be permitted at the operators' discretion, provided the cumulative lung dose remains below 50 Gy. Follow-up evaluations, including laboratory tests and dynamic imaging, will be performed at 4 weeks post-treatment and every 3 months thereafter for a total of 2 years. Efficacy data-including tumor response and survival-will be collected, with tumor responses evaluated by both site investigators and a blinded independent central review. Adverse events will be documented and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. In addition, the incidence of radioembolization-induced liver disease and radiation pneumonitis will be monitored for 6 months following the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jin Woo Choi, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Recruiting
        • Samsung Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dongho Hyun, MD, PhD
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Recruiting
        • Severance Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gyoung Min Kim, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Ilsan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 10408
        • Recruiting
        • National Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • In Joon Lee, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult aged 19 and over
  • HCC diagnosed by histology or non-invasive criteria of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease
  • Unresectable HCC beyond the UT7 criteria: the sum of the diameter of the largest tumor (cm) and the number of tumors > 7
  • Localized HCC: all tumors are in the one to five geographically adjacent Couinaud segments
  • No current or previous HCC in the untreated liver (i.e., future liver remnant [FLR])
  • FLR volume > 30% of total non-tumorous liver volume
  • Child-Pugh class A
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1
  • No major organ dysfunction according to blood test performed within two months of study enrollment:

    • Leukocytes ≥ 2,000/µL and ≤ 15,000/µL
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL (transfusion allowed to meet this criterion)
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
    • Platelet ≥ 40,000/µL
    • International normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 2.0 for patients not taking anticoagulants
    • Aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 200 IU/L (i.e., ≤ 5X upper normal limit)
    • Alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 200 IU/L (i.e., ≤ 5X upper normal limit)
    • Creatinine ≤ 2.5 mg/dL
  • Patients with a life expectancy of more than 3 months
  • For women of childbearing age, a negative serum pregnancy test
  • Patients who have adequately understood the clinical trial and consented in writing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HCC with vascular invasion and/or bile duct invasion on dynamic computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • HCC with extrahepatic spread on chest CT and abdominal CT or MRI
  • Multinodular disseminated HCC: largest tumor size < 6 cm, or number of tumors > 10
  • Patients who are not suitable for ablative radioembolization as indicated by pre-treatment mapping with 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA):

    • Cases where the estimated lung dose exceeds 30 Gy when 350 Gy of tumor absorbed dose is administered to the tumor based on the multicompartment Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) model
    • Cases with severe hepatic artery-portal vein shunting that might lead to irradiation of the non-tumorous liver segments
    • Cases where the operator determines that there is substantial adhesion with the surrounding organs such as the bowel, making ablative radioembolization infeasible
  • Cases where the operator judges that the occurrence of even mild radiation pneumonitis could be fatal, based on marked emphysema or interstitial lung disease findings on chest CT
  • Patients who have had active cancer within the last two years prior to the study enrollment
  • History of severe allergy of intolerance to contrast agents
  • Contraindication to angiography or selective visceral catheterization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Radioembolization
Ablative radioembolization using Yttrium-90 glass microspheres
The multicompartment MIRD model (a.k.a. partition model) based on diagnostic CT/MRI and 99mTc-MAA SPECT-CT will be used to plan a targeted dose of 700 Gy (± 50%) to the tumor. Given the high tumor burden, a scheduled second radioembolization within 120 days from the initial treatment will be permitted at the discretion of the operators provided the cumulative lung dose remains below 50 Gy. A scheduled second radioembolization may be considered when the largest tumor diameter exceeds 8 cm, or the estimated lung dose reaches 30 Gy while the tumor absorbed dose remains below the target dose of 700 Gy. The radioactive microsphere delivery device used will be glass-based (TheraSphere; Boston Scientific, MA, USA), in which Y90 is an integral constituent of the biocompatible glass matrix. Dosimetry planning will be made by personalized dosimetry software (Simplicit90y; Boston Scientific).
Other Names:
  • Y90 glass microsphere

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate (ORR) according to the mRECIST
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
The number of patients with partial or complete response accroding to the mRECIST as the best response, divided by the total number of participants (%)
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ORR according to the RECIST 1.1
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
The number of patients with partial or complete response according to the RECIST 1.1 as the best response, divided by the total number of participants (%)
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
ORR according to localized mRECIST and RECIST 1.1
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
The number of patients with partial or complete response as the best response, divided by the total number of participants (%). In the localized mRECIST and RECIST 1.1, the tumor response is assessed only within radioembolization-treated area.
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Duration of response according to mRECIST, localized mRECIST, and RECIST 1.1
Time Frame: Time of response up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
The time from the first documentation of partial or complete response to the first occurrence of progressive disease, death from any cause, or receipt of subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first.
Time of response up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Overall survival rate
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time of treatment up to participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Progression-free survival rates according to mRECIST, localized mRECIST, and RECIST 1.1
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time of treatment up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time-to-progression according to mRECIST, localized mRECIST, and RECIST 1.1
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled).
Time of treatment up to progression, subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled).
Major pathologic response rate (%) after surgical resection or liver transplantation
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
The number of patients with major pathologic response of the largest tumor after surgical resection or liver transplantation, divided by the total number of participants who received surgical resection or liver transplanation (%). Major pathologic response refers to ≥ 90% of pathologic necrosis of the largest resected tumor
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Curative conversion rate
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Curative conversion: resection, liver transplantation, or percutaneous ablation
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Sustainable complete response rate according to mRECIST more than 1 year
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Locoregional treatment unsuitability rate
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)

LRT unsuitability will be determined if any of the following criteria are met.

  • Lack of objective response after two sessions of intra-arterial treatments
  • Development of new HCC within the treatment zone
  • Development of vascular invasion within the treatment zone
  • Development of extrahepatic spread
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time to and reason for subsequent HCC treatment
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Threshold tumor absorbed dose (Gy) to predict radiologic complete response and objective response as the best response by localized mRECIST
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Adverse event and serious adverse event according to CTCAE v5.0
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
Time of treatment up to subsequent anti-cancer therapy, participant's death, opposition to data collection, lost to follow-up, or study termination (24 months after the last patient is enrolled)
The presence or absence of radiation pneumonitis diagnosed by chest simple X-ray or CT
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to 180 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
Time of treatment up to 180 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
The presence or absence of radioembolization-induced liver disease
Time Frame: Time of treatment up to 180 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first
Time of treatment up to 180 days after the initial treatment or subsequent anticancer treatment, whichever comes first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jin Woo Choi, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Clinical Trials on TheraSphere

Subscribe