Solving Challenging Diagnoses Through Ultra-long Read Sequencing (SCHeDULeRS)

If the study is able to demonstrate that the LRS concretely overcomes the technical limitations of diagnostic methods routinely used in laboratories, its clinical application may make possible a more accurate analysis of repeated genomic regions and offer greater sensitivity for identifying SVs (Structural Variants)

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The diagnostic performance of LRS, by applying Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT), will be evaluated through a real-time targeted approach and generation of ultra-long reads, to the identification of pathogenetic variants in genetic disorders with a currently challenging diagnosis due to the presence of pseudogenes (1) and to the precise mapping of SV breakpoints identified by aCGH for the definition of their clinical significance (2).

  1. Patients with an established molecular diagnosis will be collected for each of the following disorders: 10 with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and 10 with CYP21 deficiency. Cases with ambiguous results to test possible ONT improvements in terms of time to results and precise molecular characterization will be included. The entire range of mutations affecting each causative gene (PKD1 and CYP21A2, respectively), which globally cover all the possible types of alterations (missense, nonsense, indels, exonic and gene deletions) will be included.
  2. Collection of other 10 patients carrying copy number variants (CNVs) with aCGH-defined breakpoints mapping close to disease-genes possibly responsible for the observed clinical picture.

The main aim of this proposal is to evaluate ONT efficacy in resolving diagnostic challenges faced in the clinical genomics routine, in situations when a precise molecular diagnosis is often impossible or difficult and extremely time-consuming with current genetic tests. Sanger sequencing, NGS panels and MLPA are routinely used to identify pathogenic variants and CNVs responsible for many monogenic disorders and for the analysis through aCGH patients with isolated or syndromic intellectual disability without a specific clinical suspect. These analyses are long, technically laborious and often not individually conclusive because technical limitations may lead to ambiguous results and prevent definite diagnosis. The intent is to demonstrate that ONT, through a real-time targeted approach to increase coverage in clinically relevant regions during sequencing, outperforms current diagnostic tools in terms of rapidity and sensitivity, considerably improving the efficiency of the diagnostic process. The success of the proposed target ONT approach will provide the proof of principle to implement this strategy for the diagnosis of a wider spectrum of disorders already studied in our laboratory

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bologna
      • Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with pathogenic alterations in the PKD1 gene, aged between 30 and 70 years
  • Patients with pathogenic alterations in the CYP21A2 gene or with a not clearly defined genotype, aged between one month and 50 years
  • Patients carrying potentially pathogenic CNVs (e.g. new onset and/or in proximity of disease-associated genes), aged between one month up to 70 years
  • Availability of a suitable blood sample at the IRCCS Medical Genetics Unit AOUBO
  • Acquisition of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

- None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Target
Sequencing in samples with alterations in the PKD1 or CYP21A2 genes or with deletions identified by aCGH, LRS will be limited to the genes/loci of of interest.
The technology performed belongs to third-generation sequencing strategies and is capable of analysing very long DNA and RNA fragments.
Experimental: Genomics
The entire genome will be analysed in samples with duplications in order to precisely identify the genomic regions in which the duplicated portions have inserted
The technology performed belongs to third-generation sequencing strategies and is capable of analysing very long DNA and RNA fragments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Genetic anomalies
Time Frame: 24 months
To determine the sensitivity of the LRS in detectiong genetic variants in hard-to-analyze genomic regions and to enables precise mapping of unbalanced genomic alterations identified by routine diagnostic techniques.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mapping the breaking points of CNVs
Time Frame: 24 months
To verify whether the new sequencing technology impacts the analysis and reporting times.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pamela Magini, Biologist, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SCHeDULeRS
  • Horizon 2020 (Other Grant/Funding Number: European Commission)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Variant Nucleotide

Clinical Trials on Long-read sequencing

Subscribe