Digital Occlusal Analysis and Enamel Wear Assessment in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients Treated with Fully Digital Versus Conventional Stabilization Splints

January 15, 2025 updated by: Mohamed Sawi Mohamed, Minia University

Digital Occlusal Analysis and Enamel Wear Assessment in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients Treated with Fully Digital Versus Conventional Stabilization Splints: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

This randomized controlled research aimed to analyse the occlusion and assist the enamel wear before and after using of the stabilization splints produced by the conventional methods with the fully digitally fabricated stabilization splints.

Research question: Will the fully digital stabilization splint offer significantly better occlusal equilibration and enamel wear compared to the conventional stabilization splint? the primary outcome will be Digital occlusal analysis, and secondary outcome will be enamel wear assessment

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of fully digitally fabricated stabilization splints (FD-SS) versus conventionally manufactured stabilization splints (C-SS) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The study focuses on two primary outcomes: digital occlusal analysis and enamel wear assessment over a 6-month period.

Participants are TMD patients aged 18-40 with stable jaw relations and intact dentition, randomly assigned (1:1) to the FD-SS or C-SS group. Digital occlusal analysis is performed using OccluSense technology, which captures bite force distribution and contact points dynamically and statically. Enamel wear is assessed quantitatively using an intraoral scanner paired with Geomagic Control X 3D software for surface matching analysis. Baseline and follow-up STL datasets are compared to quantify volumetric enamel loss with micrometer precision.

In the FD-SS group, fully digital stabilization splints are fabricated using a digital workflow that includes intraoral scanning, jaw tracking with Zebris JMA devices, and CAD/CAM design in Exocad software. Splints are manufactured using 3D printing technology. In the C-SS group, conventional splints are fabricated using alginate impressions, plaster casts, and manual adjustments on a semi-adjustable articulator.

This study aims to advance the understanding of digital technologies in managing TMD, providing evidence for their efficacy in improving occlusal balance and minimizing enamel wear.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18-40 years old
  2. complete dentition
  3. intact tooth
  4. no occlusal disorder
  5. stable jaw relation
  6. No ongoing dental therapy, such as orthodontic or prosthodontics treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. pregnant/lactating women
  2. temporomandibular joint lesions found on clinical palpation or medical imaging examination
  3. dentoalveolar pathology or ongoing treatment related to TMD
  4. jaw opening less than 3 fingers
  5. patients with occlusal dysfunctions
  6. Patients with severe or moderate periodontitis.
  7. Unable to undergo examination or treatment due to the presence of a psychological or mental disorder.
  8. Severe jaw functional limitations.
  9. Removable dentures or partially dentate patients
  10. Trauma of recent date towards face, head or neck

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fully Digital Stabilization Splint (FD-SS)

Description:

Participants in this group will receive a stabilization splint fabricated using a fully digital workflow. The intervention includes:

  • Intraoral scanning of the maxillary and mandibular arches to create a digital model.
  • Jaw tracking using the Zebris JMA system to record mandibular movements.
  • CAD design of the splint using Exocad software.
  • Fabrication: 3D printing technology to manufacture the splint.

Purpose:

The FD-SS is designed to provide optimal occlusal stabilization, reduce TMJ stress, and minimize enamel wear over a 6-month period.

Device Name: Fully Digital Stabilization Splint (FD-SS)

the patients will receive a stabilization splint fabricated using a fully digital workflow includes:

Intraoral scanning of maxillary and mandibular arches to create a digital model.

Jaw tracking using the Zebris JMA system to record mandibular movements. CAD design of the splint using Exocad software. Fabrication of the splint via 3D printing technology. The FD-SS is designed to provide optimal occlusal stabilization, reduce TMJ stress, and minimize enamel wear over 6 months.

Or the patient will receive stabilization splint fabricated using conventional methods. The intervention includes:

Taking alginate impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches to create plaster casts.

Jaw registration using a Lucia jig and semi-adjustable articulator for proper occlusal adjustment.

Manual fabrication of the splint using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin. The C-SS is designed to achieve occlusal stabilization and symptom relief for TMD patients over 6 months.

Active Comparator: Conventional Stabilization Splint (C-SS)

Description:

Participants in this group will receive a stabilization splint fabricated using conventional methods. The intervention includes:

  • Taking alginate impressions of the maxillary and mandibular arches to create plaster casts.
  • Jaw registration using a Lucia jig and a semi-adjustable articulator for occlusal adjustment.
  • Manual fabrication of the splint using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin.

Purpose:

The C-SS is designed to achieve occlusal stabilization and provide symptom relief for patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) over 6 months.

Device Name: Conventional Stabilization Splint (C-SS)

the patients will receive a stabilization splint fabricated using a fully digital workflow includes:

Intraoral scanning of maxillary and mandibular arches to create a digital model.

Jaw tracking using the Zebris JMA system to record mandibular movements. CAD design of the splint using Exocad software. Fabrication of the splint via 3D printing technology. The FD-SS is designed to provide optimal occlusal stabilization, reduce TMJ stress, and minimize enamel wear over 6 months.

Or the patient will receive stabilization splint fabricated using conventional methods. The intervention includes:

Taking alginate impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches to create plaster casts.

Jaw registration using a Lucia jig and semi-adjustable articulator for proper occlusal adjustment.

Manual fabrication of the splint using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin. The C-SS is designed to achieve occlusal stabilization and symptom relief for TMD patients over 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Occlusal Force Measurement: • Measured using OccluSense in Newtons (N).
Time Frame: 6 months

Occlusal Force Measurement:

  • Measured using OccluSense in Newtons (N)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tooth Wear Measurement using an intraoral scanner
Time Frame: 6 months

Comparison of STL datasets using Geomagic Control X software.

  • Measured as % of surface overlap or deviation in microns.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 26, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 25, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 17, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on TMD

Clinical Trials on stabilization splint

Subscribe