Severe Acute Malnutrition and Child Development Clinical Trial in Mwanza (BRIGHTSAM)

January 13, 2025 updated by: Dr George PrayGod, National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania

BRAIN DEVELOPMENT, GROWTH and HEALTH in CHILDREN with SEVERE ACUTE MALNUTRITION

This is a randomized clinical trial to learn whether ready-to-use therapeutic foods enriched with choline and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) together with psychosocial stimulating activities work well to improve child development in children with severe acute malnutrition(SAM). The overall question this trial aims to answer is can the health and development outcomes of children with SAM be improved through optimized nutritional treatment and integrated psychosocial support.

Researchers will compare the new ready-to-use therapeutic food and an integrated psychosocial stimulation to a standard look-alike nutritional supplement that contains no additional nutrients being investigated and the standard nutritional counseling given locally and assess its effects on child development in children with severe acute malnutrition.

Participants will:

  • Be given the trial interventions which will be delivered over 12 weeks
  • After the 12 weeks of intervention, participants will return for outcome evaluations (week 12 study visit), which will be repeated at follow-up visits after 24 and 48 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Estimated, 13.6 million children were affected by severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in 2022. Early childhood is a critical period of brain development and children exposed to malnutrition in early life have poorer school performance and lower income in adult life. Introduction of Ready to use therapeutic foods (RUTF) has greatly improved the nutritional recovery of children with SAM. However, SAM remains associated with adverse effects on child cognitive and social development. The balance in the RUTF between polyunsaturated n-6 and n-3 essential fatty acids (EFAs) in RUTF has been questioned. Essential fatty acid (EFA) status is associated with child development, and children given the standard RUTF do not improve their n-3 EFA status after recovery.

A trial in Malawi found a positive effect on cognitive scores six months after completing nutritional therapy with RUTF with added preformed docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) of the n-3 series, which is essential for neural growth. There is also a potential for improving the content of other nutrients of importance for neurodevelopment in early childhood like choline, which is essential for neurotransmitter synthesis and phospholipids in the brain. Studies have indicated a synergistic relationship between n-3 EFAs and choline, suggesting that low levels of one or both may negatively impact cognition.

Deficits in child development associated with SAM are not only caused by inadequate diets. Families exposed to malnutrition are often affected by psychological distress, consequently children are likely to be offered little stimulation and responsive care. However, in practice, support for psychosocial stimulation and responsive caregiving is rarely offered during hospital-based treatment, and it is still not included in the guidelines for community-based treatment of SAM. The intensity of this intervention is difficult under the constraints of most health services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). More recent packages for promoting responsive care have shown some effects, but often not when implemented at scale or within systems of care.

In this study we hypothesize that optimized nutritional treatment and integrated psychosocial support can improve the health and development outcomes of children with SAM.

Specific objectives:

  1. to assess the effects of a modified RUTF and psychosocial stimulation, individually and combined, on attention, cognitive, motor, language and psycho-emotional development in children treated for SAM;
  2. to investigate the pathways of intervention effects on cognitive development by assessing the role of DHA and choline status in the child as well as caregiver factors which include caregiver-child interaction, home stimulation and maternal psychological distress;
  3. to assess how, why and for whom the modified RUTF and psychosocial interventions work within the trial context, perceptions of their feasibility of implementation within the routine health system, and the climate and environmental sustainability of interventions.

Methods:

This trial is designed as a 2x2 factorial randomized clinical trial to assess the effects of DHA and choline enriched vs. standard RUTF and psychosocial stimulation vs. standard counselling in management of SAM. Participants will be individually randomised to nutritional intervention arms and clusters will be randomized to psychosocial intervention arms.

The interventions will be delivered over a period of 12 weeks. After enrolment and baseline data collection, participants will receive their first RUTF sachets. They will then be requested to return to the study site for a total of seven visits during the intervention period to receive interventions. After the 12 weeks of intervention, participants will return for outcome evaluations (week 12 study visit), which will be repeated at follow-up visits after 24 and 48 weeks. The study will take place in Mwanza region, Tanzania. The trial will include children with uncomplicated SAM aged 6-36 months from eight health care facilities in Ilemela municipality, Nyamagana municipality and Magu district.

Outcomes:

The primary outcomes is the change in child development scores, which will be assessed at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks and compared with intervention groups. These will assess gross, fine motor, language and psycho -emotional skills by validated tool called (MDAT) Malawi Development Assessment Tool) and neurocognitive function will be accessed by eye-tracking. Secondary outcomes will allow us to assess proximate effects of the interventions, which may mediate long-term effects on development

Analysis:

The primary analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle using available case data. The analysis will assess intervention effects based on the 2x2 factorial design by comparing changes in outcomes between baseline and intervention endline (i.e., 12 weeks) using a linear regression model adjusted for sex, age and month of inclusion to account for possible seasonal effects.

Secondary analysis will include assessment of intervention effects at 24- and 48-weeks follow-up using a linear mixed model to include repeated measurements. The models will include the baseline value of the outcome as fixed effect and participant as random effect to account for the correlation between measurements from the same participant. These models will also include adjustment for other variables as appropriate.

Secondary analyses will include per-protocol analyses to assess effects within groups with high compliance with the interventions

Ethics:

Ethical approval has been sought from the Medical Research Coordinating Committee (MRCC) of the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine ethics committee.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

800

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age from 6-36 months.
  2. Consent given by a caregiver older than 18 years.
  3. Diagnosed with severe acute malnutrition (MUAC<115 mm, or WHZ ≤-3 or bipedal pitting edema).
  4. Eligible for RUTF treatment (expanded below).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Conditions preventing the child from receiving interventions, e.g., peanut butter allergy or cleft palate.
  2. Moderate or severe disability which significantly affects normal child development (e.g., cerebral palsy or hydrocephalus), identified using a standardized screening form.
  3. Children of families not living in the area or planning to move from the area within the follow-up period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: eRUTF
Choline and DHA enriched Ready to use therapeutic foods

DHA & Choline enriched RUTF The modified RUTF is a peanut butter paste that contains vegetable oil, skim milk powder, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals the same nutrients which are the same as the standard RUTF but is fortified additionally with 250 mg of choline and 200 mg of preformed DHA per 92-gram sachet.

Standard RUTF The standard RUTF used in the BrightSAM trial is a peanut butter paste with vegetable oil, skim milk powder, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals that is intended to cover the child's total daily nutritional needs. Standard RUTF will be manufactured in compliance with the specifications recommended by the Codex Alimentarius Commission17.

Placebo Comparator: sRUTF
Standard ready-to-use therapeutic foods

DHA & Choline enriched RUTF The modified RUTF is a peanut butter paste that contains vegetable oil, skim milk powder, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals the same nutrients which are the same as the standard RUTF but is fortified additionally with 250 mg of choline and 200 mg of preformed DHA per 92-gram sachet.

Standard RUTF The standard RUTF used in the BrightSAM trial is a peanut butter paste with vegetable oil, skim milk powder, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals that is intended to cover the child's total daily nutritional needs. Standard RUTF will be manufactured in compliance with the specifications recommended by the Codex Alimentarius Commission17.

Experimental: PS
Psychosocial stimulation

The psychosocial intervention has been developed and piloted for this study as a context-relevant adaptation from the WHO/UNICEF Care for Child Development package. It will be delivered in group sessions, where the primary caregiver will attend along with the child participating in the trial.

During seven sessions of approximately two hours, caregivers will be trained on a variety of subjects which include; the first four sessions will be introductory and provide the basics of nutrition, the basics of psychosocial stimulation, and play and communication practices. We will build on the increasing experience of the caregivers and provide a deeper understanding of early child development.

Standard nutritional counseling will adhere to national guidelines for pediatric management of severe acute malnutrition including nutritional counseling and psychosocial stimulation.

Placebo Comparator: sNC
Standard nutritional counseling and psychosocial stimualtion

The psychosocial intervention has been developed and piloted for this study as a context-relevant adaptation from the WHO/UNICEF Care for Child Development package. It will be delivered in group sessions, where the primary caregiver will attend along with the child participating in the trial.

During seven sessions of approximately two hours, caregivers will be trained on a variety of subjects which include; the first four sessions will be introductory and provide the basics of nutrition, the basics of psychosocial stimulation, and play and communication practices. We will build on the increasing experience of the caregivers and provide a deeper understanding of early child development.

Standard nutritional counseling will adhere to national guidelines for pediatric management of severe acute malnutrition including nutritional counseling and psychosocial stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in MDAT scores
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks

Development will be assessed by validated methods and include:

Gross motor, fine motor, language, and psycho-emotional skills assessed by the Malawi Development assessment tool (MDAT)

Assessed at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Change in eye tracking scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Neurocognitive function assessed by eye-tracking technique
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of caregiver stimulation and support
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Caregiver stimulation and support assessed by Observations of Mother and Child Interactions (OMCI) questionnaire
Assessed at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Fatty acid composition
Time Frame: at baseline and at week 12, and week 48
- Fatty acid composition assessed by gas chromatography
at baseline and at week 12, and week 48
Mid upper arm circumference (MUAC)
Time Frame: Baseline, weekly, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
- MUAC assessed using non-stretchable tape measure
Baseline, weekly, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Mortality
Time Frame: 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Proportion of children who die during follow-up
12, 24 and 48 weeks
Process evaluation
Time Frame: Interviews will be conducted after the last PS session ( Week 11) , and where possible, again with the same caregivers at long term follow-up (week 24 and 48).

The process evaluation will examine the following aspects of the interventions:

  • Implementation
  • Mechanisms
  • Context
  • Acceptability
  • Feasibility of implementation within the health system
  • Programme theory
Interviews will be conducted after the last PS session ( Week 11) , and where possible, again with the same caregivers at long term follow-up (week 24 and 48).
Levels of choline
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Levels of choline and related metabolites assessed by mass spectrometry
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Serum CRP assessed as a marker of systemic inflammation
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Ferritin
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Serum ferritin assessed as marker of iron status
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Level of Alanine transaminase
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Serum alanine transaminase as a marker of liver function
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Level of Aspartate transaminase
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Serum aspartate transaminase assessed as a marker of liver function
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Level of maternal psychological distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Maternal psychological distress assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Status of the learning environment
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
The status of learning environment assessed by the Family Care Indicators (FCI) questionnaire
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Status of maternal social support framework
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
The status of maternal social support framework assessed by the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support questionnaire
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Morbidity
Time Frame: 12, 24 and 48 weeks
. Proportion of children with one or multiple illness episodes during follow-up
12, 24 and 48 weeks
- Weight-for-height z-score (WHZ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
- Weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) based on length/height (m) and weight (kg) measurements'
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Height-for-age z-score (HAZ) , based on length/height and age)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Height-for-age z-score (HAZ) assessed based on length/height (m) and age (month)
Baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks
Rate of nutritional recovery at the end of intervention period
Time Frame: 12
Rate of nutritional recovery at the end of intervention period, defined as WHZ > -2 and MUAC > 125 mm, and no bilateral pitting oedema for two weeks
12
Proportion relapsing to moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) after recovery
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Proportion relapsing to moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) after recovery, measured as WHZ ≤ -2 and >-3 or MUAC ≤ 125 and >115mm)
12 weeks
Proportion relapsing to SAM after recovery
Time Frame: Any time point, 24 and 48 weeks
Proportion relapsing to SAM after recovery, measured as WHZ <-3, MUAC <115mm or presence of nutritional oedema, assessed at any caregiver-initiated contacts to the study site at any point during the 48 weeks of follow-up and at study visits at 24 and 48 weeks
Any time point, 24 and 48 weeks
Implementation evaluation
Time Frame: Interviews will be conducted after the last PS session ( Week 11) , and where possible, again with the same caregivers at long term follow-up (week 24 and 48).

The implementation component will assess

  • The fidelity of implementation of each component of the intervention,
  • The dose (amount, frequency) of each component delivered to the children,
  • Any adaptations to the intervention and why these were made,
  • The reach of the interventions, provider and caregiver experience
  • Perceptions, mechanisms and any unintended consequences.
Interviews will be conducted after the last PS session ( Week 11) , and where possible, again with the same caregivers at long term follow-up (week 24 and 48).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mette Olsen, MSc, PhD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: George PrayGod, MD, PhD, National Institute for Medical Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 14, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DFC file no. 23-13-RH (Other Grant/Funding Number: DANIDA under Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Acute Malnutrition in Childhood

Clinical Trials on Ready to Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF)

Subscribe