- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06784102
Clinical Evaluation of Pain and Debonding Forces with Damon Clear Debonding Plier Utilizing a Third Wedging Arm
Clinical Assessment of Pain Levels and Debonding Forces Using the Damon Clear Debonding Plier: a Split-mouth Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This clinical assessment of pain levels and debonding forces using the Damon clear debonding plier was designed as a split-mouth controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and comfort of two orthodontic debonding methods. Pain is a significant concern during orthodontic treatment, often influencing patient compliance and overall satisfaction. While research has focused extensively on pain during active treatment, less attention has been directed toward discomfort associated with the removal of orthodontic brackets. Debonding, an integral step in concluding orthodontic treatment, should ideally be painless and harmless to the enamel. However, the discomfort experienced by patients during this process remains a largely underexplored domain. This study sought to fill this gap by comparing pain levels and debonding forces between two types of pliers: the traditional bracket remover plier and the Damon clear debonding plier, the latter featuring a third wedging arm.
The study included 40 orthodontic patients aged 17 to 25 years who had completed comprehensive treatment with metallic brackets. A split-mouth design was utilized, where the right side of each patient's mouth, including the upper and lower quadrants from the central incisor to the second premolar, was treated using the traditional bracket remover plier, categorized as Group A. The left side of the mouth, comprising the same set of teeth, was treated with the Damon clear debonding plier, categorized as Group B. Each plier was modified with a strain gauge load cell and connected to a digital weighting indicator scale, creating a force-sensitive prototype capable of precisely measuring the forces applied during debonding.
Participants were screened for eligibility based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure standardization. Inclusion criteria required patients to have a full set of permanent teeth (excluding third molars), no significant dental restorations, no psychological conditions, and an ability to comprehend and respond to anxiety and pain assessment questionnaires. Patients with missing teeth, craniofacial abnormalities, mobile teeth, or a history of recent medications that could influence pain perception were excluded. Prior to the procedure, participants' anxiety levels were assessed using two validated tools: the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS). Those with high anxiety scores were omitted to avoid potential bias.
Pain perception was measured immediately after the debonding procedure using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), chosen for its reliability and preference among patients. The force applied during bracket removal was recorded for each tooth. The debonding process targeted the first five teeth in each quadrant, ensuring uniformity in the procedure. A blinded statistician analyzed the collected data using the T-test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Baghdad, Iraq
- university of Baghdad, college of dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- individuals aged 17-25 years with the ability to comprehend and respond to questionnaires
- no recent medication intake
- the presence of all permanent teeth except third molars
- sound teeth with minimal prior dental interventions
- brackets bonded with 3M bonding agent and composite (3M, St. Paul, U.S)
- no debonded brackets at the time of assessment
- completion of orthodontic treatment using upper and lower fixed appliances with metallic brackets (Roth/MBT prescription, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany,)
- absence of miniscrews at the completion of treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients who were unable to understand the questionnaires,
- those with missing teeth (excluding third molars)
- teeth with prostheses
- craniofacial deformities affecting dentoalveolar bone
- previous surgeries
- heavily restored teeth
- mobile teeth
- teeth with endodontic fillings
- cases with ceramic or plastic brackets
- patients with psychological problems or under psychological medication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Bracket debonding plier group
The control group (n=40 subjects) involved brackets debonding on the right side (upper and lower quadrants from central incisor to second premolar) of each patient, utilizing a bracket remover debonding plier
|
|
|
Experimental: Damon clear debonding plier group
The study group B (n=40) encompassed debonding on the left side (upper and lower quadrants from central incisor to second premolar) of each patient, employing the Damon clear debonding plier
|
This clinical trial evaluates two types of orthodontic debonding pliers: the Damon Clear Debonding Plier and the traditional Bracket Remover Debonding Plier.
The Damon Clear plier features a third wedging arm, which applies an additional lingual or palatal force in addition to the standard occluso-gingival force.
The study is designed to assess and compare pain levels and debonding forces between the two pliers.
A total of 40 patients, aged 17-25, were treated with both devices using a split-mouth design.
The Damon Clear Plier is tested on one side of the mouth while the Bracket Remover Plier is used on the opposite side.
Pain perception was measured immediately after the debonding procedure using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and the forces applied during debonding were measured with a force-sensitive prototype.
The study aims to identify the device that provides effective debonding with less pain.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pain level estimation
Time Frame: Time frame was immediate, as pain perception was assessed immediately after debonding. Pain levels were measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) right after the procedure to capture the immediate discomfort and pain
|
discomfort or pain experienced by patients during the removal of orthodontic brackets from their teeth, patients were prompted to assign a numerical rating scale (NRS) score, ranging from 0 to 10, to assess the perception of pain associated with each individual bracket and the corresponding tooth
|
Time frame was immediate, as pain perception was assessed immediately after debonding. Pain levels were measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) right after the procedure to capture the immediate discomfort and pain
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
debonding forces
Time Frame: Time frame was immediate, as the force required to detach the brackets was measured immediately during the debonding procedure using a force-sensitive plier prototype, which recorded the force at the exact moment of bracket detachment
|
the amount of force required to detach an orthodontic bracket from a tooth during the debonding process.
It is an important factor in determining the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.
Excessive debonding force can cause damage to the enamel or surrounding tissues, while insufficient force may lead to a delay or incomplete removal of the brackets.
The force is typically applied through specific tools (debonding pliers), and the direction and distribution of the force can influence both the ease of brackets removal and the potential for patient discomfort
|
Time frame was immediate, as the force required to detach the brackets was measured immediately during the debonding procedure using a force-sensitive plier prototype, which recorded the force at the exact moment of bracket detachment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 606422
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain Intensity Assessment
-
Singapore General HospitalMinistry of Health, SingaporeCompleted
-
University of RedlandsCompletedForce Production | Pain Intensity AssessmentUnited States
-
BalajiEnrolling by invitationPain Management | Pain Intensity AssessmentUnited States
-
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityActive, not recruitingPain | Neck Pain | Functional Status | Pain Intensity Assessment | Neck Pain ChronicTurkey
-
Ricardo A Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc, FACOGCompletedAnxiety | Labor Stage, First | Pain Intensity AssessmentHonduras
-
SIRIN GUNER ONURCompletedDental Anxiety | Pain Intensity AssessmentTurkey
-
Amasya UniversityCompletedInterscalene Nerve Block | Pain Intensity Assessment | Shoulder Anterior Capsule Block (SHAC Block) | Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG)Turkey
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic | Pain Intensity | Acute Post-operative Pain | Pain Assessment Pain IntensityEgypt
-
University of Campania Luigi VanvitelliCompletedAnxiety | Discomfort | Pain Intensity AssessmentItaly
-
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development...Grünenthal GmbHCompletedOsteoarthritis | Arthralgia | Low Back Pain | Sciatica | Pain Intensity Assessment
Clinical Trials on Damon Clear Debonding Plier (the primary intervention being tested in this study).
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedHot Flashes | Menopause | Vasomotor DisturbanceUnited States