Clinical Evaluation of Pain and Debonding Forces with Damon Clear Debonding Plier Utilizing a Third Wedging Arm

January 17, 2025 updated by: Layth Nissan, University of Baghdad

Clinical Assessment of Pain Levels and Debonding Forces Using the Damon Clear Debonding Plier: a Split-mouth Controlled Clinical Trial

This clinical study aimed to assess pain levels and debonding forces using two different pliers: the traditional bracket remover plier and the Damon clear debonding plier. A total of 40 orthodontic patients (ages 17-25) participated in a split-mouth controlled trial. The patients were divided into two groups, with Group A (Control) using the traditional bracket remover plier and Group B using the Damon clear plier, which features a third wedging arm. Pain perception was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and debonding forces were measured using a force-sensitive prototype.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical assessment of pain levels and debonding forces using the Damon clear debonding plier was designed as a split-mouth controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and comfort of two orthodontic debonding methods. Pain is a significant concern during orthodontic treatment, often influencing patient compliance and overall satisfaction. While research has focused extensively on pain during active treatment, less attention has been directed toward discomfort associated with the removal of orthodontic brackets. Debonding, an integral step in concluding orthodontic treatment, should ideally be painless and harmless to the enamel. However, the discomfort experienced by patients during this process remains a largely underexplored domain. This study sought to fill this gap by comparing pain levels and debonding forces between two types of pliers: the traditional bracket remover plier and the Damon clear debonding plier, the latter featuring a third wedging arm.

The study included 40 orthodontic patients aged 17 to 25 years who had completed comprehensive treatment with metallic brackets. A split-mouth design was utilized, where the right side of each patient's mouth, including the upper and lower quadrants from the central incisor to the second premolar, was treated using the traditional bracket remover plier, categorized as Group A. The left side of the mouth, comprising the same set of teeth, was treated with the Damon clear debonding plier, categorized as Group B. Each plier was modified with a strain gauge load cell and connected to a digital weighting indicator scale, creating a force-sensitive prototype capable of precisely measuring the forces applied during debonding.

Participants were screened for eligibility based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure standardization. Inclusion criteria required patients to have a full set of permanent teeth (excluding third molars), no significant dental restorations, no psychological conditions, and an ability to comprehend and respond to anxiety and pain assessment questionnaires. Patients with missing teeth, craniofacial abnormalities, mobile teeth, or a history of recent medications that could influence pain perception were excluded. Prior to the procedure, participants' anxiety levels were assessed using two validated tools: the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS). Those with high anxiety scores were omitted to avoid potential bias.

Pain perception was measured immediately after the debonding procedure using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), chosen for its reliability and preference among patients. The force applied during bracket removal was recorded for each tooth. The debonding process targeted the first five teeth in each quadrant, ensuring uniformity in the procedure. A blinded statistician analyzed the collected data using the T-test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Baghdad, Iraq
        • university of Baghdad, college of dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • individuals aged 17-25 years with the ability to comprehend and respond to questionnaires
  • no recent medication intake
  • the presence of all permanent teeth except third molars
  • sound teeth with minimal prior dental interventions
  • brackets bonded with 3M bonding agent and composite (3M, St. Paul, U.S)
  • no debonded brackets at the time of assessment
  • completion of orthodontic treatment using upper and lower fixed appliances with metallic brackets (Roth/MBT prescription, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany,)
  • absence of miniscrews at the completion of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who were unable to understand the questionnaires,
  • those with missing teeth (excluding third molars)
  • teeth with prostheses
  • craniofacial deformities affecting dentoalveolar bone
  • previous surgeries
  • heavily restored teeth
  • mobile teeth
  • teeth with endodontic fillings
  • cases with ceramic or plastic brackets
  • patients with psychological problems or under psychological medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Bracket debonding plier group
The control group (n=40 subjects) involved brackets debonding on the right side (upper and lower quadrants from central incisor to second premolar) of each patient, utilizing a bracket remover debonding plier
Experimental: Damon clear debonding plier group
The study group B (n=40) encompassed debonding on the left side (upper and lower quadrants from central incisor to second premolar) of each patient, employing the Damon clear debonding plier
This clinical trial evaluates two types of orthodontic debonding pliers: the Damon Clear Debonding Plier and the traditional Bracket Remover Debonding Plier. The Damon Clear plier features a third wedging arm, which applies an additional lingual or palatal force in addition to the standard occluso-gingival force. The study is designed to assess and compare pain levels and debonding forces between the two pliers. A total of 40 patients, aged 17-25, were treated with both devices using a split-mouth design. The Damon Clear Plier is tested on one side of the mouth while the Bracket Remover Plier is used on the opposite side. Pain perception was measured immediately after the debonding procedure using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and the forces applied during debonding were measured with a force-sensitive prototype. The study aims to identify the device that provides effective debonding with less pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain level estimation
Time Frame: Time frame was immediate, as pain perception was assessed immediately after debonding. Pain levels were measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) right after the procedure to capture the immediate discomfort and pain
discomfort or pain experienced by patients during the removal of orthodontic brackets from their teeth, patients were prompted to assign a numerical rating scale (NRS) score, ranging from 0 to 10, to assess the perception of pain associated with each individual bracket and the corresponding tooth
Time frame was immediate, as pain perception was assessed immediately after debonding. Pain levels were measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) right after the procedure to capture the immediate discomfort and pain

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
debonding forces
Time Frame: Time frame was immediate, as the force required to detach the brackets was measured immediately during the debonding procedure using a force-sensitive plier prototype, which recorded the force at the exact moment of bracket detachment
the amount of force required to detach an orthodontic bracket from a tooth during the debonding process. It is an important factor in determining the effectiveness and safety of the procedure. Excessive debonding force can cause damage to the enamel or surrounding tissues, while insufficient force may lead to a delay or incomplete removal of the brackets. The force is typically applied through specific tools (debonding pliers), and the direction and distribution of the force can influence both the ease of brackets removal and the potential for patient discomfort
Time frame was immediate, as the force required to detach the brackets was measured immediately during the debonding procedure using a force-sensitive plier prototype, which recorded the force at the exact moment of bracket detachment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

confidentiality of research and participants information

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Intensity Assessment

Clinical Trials on Damon Clear Debonding Plier (the primary intervention being tested in this study).

Subscribe