Magnesium Trial in Acute Asthma in Emergency Department (MAGICIAN)

December 11, 2025 updated by: Suzanne Schuh

Despite optimal initial emergency department (ED) therapy, 50% of children with severe acute asthma have ongoing moderate-severe respiratory distress. Guidelines recommend intravenous magnesium (IVMg) for them, yet evidence for IVMg efficacy is scant and disparate. While early small Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) suggested hospitalization benefit, recent large observational studies found no association between IVMg and improved outcomes. IVMg therapy is resource-intensive, can cause hypotension and demands close monitoring. Previous RCTs only assessed early Mg effect at 1-2 hours, overlooked the peak effect of key co-interventions such as corticosteroids and did not use validated scores. IVMg use is variable and often delayed until ≥4 hours after ED therapy is started and after the hospitalization decision has been made. Thus, in observational studies children given IVMg are 6-10 times more likely to be hospitalized; these studies have major confounding and the true IVMg treatment effect is thus unknown. To conclusively determine if IVMg alters the exacerbation course, it must be given early, and the primary outcome measure should be the severity of respiratory distress measured at the peak effect of key co-interventions to focus on a clinically meaningful and objective effect. The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM)-a valid, discriminative, reproducible and responsive-to-change instrument-is thus the ideal primary outcome measure. Hospitalization outcome has major confounding by indication and MD perceptions.

Primary Aim: In children with acute asthma remaining in moderate-severe distress after 1 hour of initial ED therapy, is early IVMg therapy associated with a significantly greater improvement in respiratory distress, measured by PRAM, at 2 hours after starting the intervention, compared to placebo? Hypothesis: IVMg will yield significantly greater PRAM improvement of ≥1.0 point than placebo.

Expected Outcomes: This trial will clarify if there is an incremental benefit of IVMg in decreasing respiratory distress in pediatric refractory acute asthma. A positive result will establish a proven standard of care for this indication, with a need for Knowledge Translation (KT) to implement routine early IVMg therapy. A negative result will lead to de-implementation of IVMg which may also lead to cost savings.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators propose a 6-centre randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Two groups will be compared: IV Mg sulfate and IV (intravenous) 0.9% saline placebo. After initial therapy with the systemic Corticosteroids (CSs) routinely used for acute asthma management at a given site, 3 treatments with inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium (ipratropium use as per local practice), eligible patients with PRAM ≥5 will, under the care of the research nurse, receive a 30-minute IV infusion of 75 mg/kg of Mg sulfate (maximum 2.0 g) [experimental group] or an identical volume of 0.9% saline [control group]. Outcomes will be measured during the 180-minute observational period in the ED and at 72 hours post ED discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

192

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alberta
    • Ontario
      • Edmonton, Ontario, Canada, T6G 2B7
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4L8
        • Not yet recruiting
        • McMaster Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • April Kam, MD
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L1
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Waleed Alqurashi, MD
        • Contact:
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • Recruiting
        • The Hospital for Sick Children
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Suzanne Schuh
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yaron Finkelstein
    • Quebec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age 2.00-17.99 years (prior to 18th birthday),
  2. Diagnosis of asthma, defined as an asthma or probable asthma diagnosis/asthma-like phenotype made by a physician (this includes ED physician) in a patient who in the opinion of the treating ED physician requires therapy for acute asthma in the ED (GINA asthma guidelines, 2024).
  3. Moderate-severe asthma after initial therapy with 3 treatments of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium, defined as an eligibility PRAM ≥5, indicating a strong association with hospitalization.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Receipt of IVMg within 24 hours prior to ED arrival.
  2. Need for airway support on arrival. (Airway support on arrival meeting exclusion criteria will include immediate need for high flow nasal cannula therapy, non-invasive CPAP/bi-PAP ventilation or invasive ventilation with endotracheal intubation, as decided by the attending Emergency Department (ED) physician. Supplemental oxygen therapy will not represent an exclusion criterion.)
  3. Known renal, chronic pulmonary, neurologic, cardiac or systemic disease: these may influence outcomes after Mg.
  4. Known hypersensitivity to Mg sulfate.
  5. Previous enrollment.
  6. Poor mastery of English and/or French language precluding informed consent understanding.
  7. No phone/email; unavailable for follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group
This group will receive a single dose of intravenous magnesium sulfate over 30 minutes. After this treatment has been completed, they may also get further Ventolin inhalations or other asthma medicines which are not part of the study, as recommended by the emergency physician. The participant will be monitored closely by the study nurse who will measure their breathing, heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen for 3 hours after the study treatment. The study nurse will also notify the emergency physician of any major changes.
After initial therapy with the systemic CSs routinely used for acute asthma management at a given site, 3 treatments with inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium, eligible patients with PRAM ≥5 will, under the care of the research nurse, receive a 30-minute IV infusion of 75 mg/kg of Mg sulfate(maximum 2.0 g) [experimental group]
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group
This group, will receive a single dose of intravenous placebo (normal saline, i.e. salt water) over 30 minutes. After this treatment has been completed, they may also get further Ventolin inhalations or other asthma medicines which are not part of the study, as recommended by the emergency physician who is taking care of the participant. They will be monitored closely by the study nurse who will measure the participant's breathing, heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen for 3 hours after the study treatment. The study nurse will also notify the emergency physician of any major changes in their health.
After initial therapy with the systemic CSs routinely used for acute asthma management at a given site, 3 treatments with inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium, eligible patients with PRAM ≥5 will, under the care of the research nurse, receive a 30-minute IV infusion of 0.9% saline [control group].

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score: This score ranges from 0-12. A score from 0-3 is mild, 4-7 moderate and 8-12 severe. A low score is a better outcome and a high score is a worse outcome.
Time Frame: The primary outcome measure will be the PRAM score at 120 minutes post start of experimental therapy.
PRAM is a validated 12-point asthma severity score which exhibits the most comprehensive measurement properties of all asthma scores and has been successfully used as an outcome in major trials. It is the only score with demonstrated criterion validity, using respiratory resistance as the gold standard. PRAM has been validated in both preschool and school-aged children in the ED with asthma and has strong association with admission. PRAM has inter-rater reliability above 70% and is adopted in all pediatric EDs in Canada. Most children treated for acute asthma are preschoolers who lack coordination to perform pulmonary function tests reliably. To maximize the accuracy of the PRAM measurement, all study nurses will complete an online PRAM training module. We will use an eligibility cut-off of PRAM ≥ 5 post initial therapy as this is associated with clinically concerning respiratory distress requiring further intervention. A PRAM score from 0-3 is mild, 4-7 moderate and 8-12 severe.
The primary outcome measure will be the PRAM score at 120 minutes post start of experimental therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalization for asthma at the index ED visit
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after starting experimental therapy
Defined as admission to an inpatient unit due to continued/worsening distress
Up to 24 hours after starting experimental therapy
Changes in respiratory rate
Time Frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to 30,60,120 and 180 minutes post intervention (respiratory rate )
Changes in vital signs
From baseline (pre-intervention) to 30,60,120 and 180 minutes post intervention (respiratory rate )
Changes in oxygen saturation
Time Frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to 30,60,120 and 180 minutes post intervention ( oxygen saturation)
Changes in vital signs
From baseline (pre-intervention) to 30,60,120 and 180 minutes post intervention ( oxygen saturation)
Changes in blood pressure
Time Frame: From baseline (pre-intervention) to 10,20,30,60,120, and 180 minutes post intervention (blood pressure).
Changes in vital signs
From baseline (pre-intervention) to 10,20,30,60,120, and 180 minutes post intervention (blood pressure).
Hospitalization for asthma at any medical facility
Time Frame: within 72 hours post- ED discharge
Defined as admission to an inpatient unit due to continued/worsening distress
within 72 hours post- ED discharge
Unscheduled asthma-related visits to any health care provider
Time Frame: within 72 hours post- ED discharge
Family-initiated asthma-related medical visit
within 72 hours post- ED discharge
Hospital length of stay.
Time Frame: From presentation at the Emergency Department triage to the time of hospital discharge, up to 4 weeks.
Length of stay is the duration of a hospital stay in hours
From presentation at the Emergency Department triage to the time of hospital discharge, up to 4 weeks.
Changes in PRAM score
Time Frame: Changes in PRAM score from baseline (pre intervention) to 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes after start of experimental therapy
Changes in vital signs
Changes in PRAM score from baseline (pre intervention) to 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes after start of experimental therapy
PRAM denoting mild asthma (≤ 3 points is a widely accepted discharge criterion).
Time Frame: at 120 minutes post intervention
Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) is a valid clinical score assessing acute asthma severity in toddlers and teenages. Score ranges from 0 to 12 (mild to severe). A higher score is a more severe asthma measurement. A low score is a better outcome than a high score.
at 120 minutes post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on magnesium sulfate

Subscribe