Impact of a Technology Platform Based on Enhanced Recovery After(ERAS) Surgery on Length of Stay After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Timely Project (REPLICCARIII)

October 2, 2025 updated by: Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Estudo Randomizado de Cluster Escalonado Para Avaliar o Impacto de Uma Plataforma tecnológica Baseada no ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) no Tempo de permanência após Cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica: Projeto Tempos Certos - REPLICCAR III

Cardiovascular diseases continue to be the leading cause of death worldwide. Among them, coronary artery disease has the greatest impact, being characterized as one of the main causes of death in Brazil over the last decade. One of the well-established treatments is coronary artery bypass grafting, which is the most performed among cardiac surgeries and, in our scenario, is primarily funded by the Unified Health System (SUS). The information obtained from the Paulista Registry of Cardiovascular Surgeries (REPLICCAR), in partnership with FAPESP, has been important for implementing improvements in the landscape of cardiac surgeries in the state of São Paulo. Although outcomes in cardiac surgery have improved due to the structuring and organization of quality programs, this is still not a reality at the national level. In a situation where data collection and quality initiatives play a central role in continuous improvement, generating value becomes essential for the sustainability of cardiac surgery programs. In this sense, the concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has gained increasing traction. This concept is based on multidisciplinary protocols and scientific evidence, which help prepare patients for rapid recovery, resulting in reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, and, primarily, lower hospital costs. On the other hand, the increase in surgical waiting lists has also led to a rise in home mortality due to cardiac causes. Thus, among the various challenges imposed by the current scenario, the investigators believe that preparing patients for rapid recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting presents an opportunity for the sustainability of the healthcare system. Therefore, the aim of this project is to evaluate the impact of a technology platform based on ERAS on the postoperative recovery time of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in reference centers in the state of São Paulo, Timely Project - REPLICCAR III.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

480

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 05403-900
        • Recruiting
        • InCor - Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 05403-900
        • Not yet recruiting
        • InCor - Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Omar AV Mejia, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marcos G Tiveron, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fernando F Ribas, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mário Issa, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Valquiria P Campagnucci, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gabrielle B Borgomoni, BSc; PhD student

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults over 18 years old
  • Indication for primary isolated CABG (elective or urgent status)
  • Own a personal cell phone
  • Have internet access
  • Knowledgeable in using the device
  • Full understanding and agreement regarding the informed consent form (ICF)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for associated surgery
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin level greater than 8%
  • Creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min
  • Pre-operative atrial fibrillation or use of pre-operative anticoagulation
  • Hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL
  • Users of illicit drugs
  • STS score greater than 4%
  • Physical or mental disabilities that prevent adherence to the protocol
  • Refusal by the patient or family member

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard care for CABG
Patients will be treated with CABG following the standard of care for each participant institution.
Experimental: ERACS with Digital Platform
Patient will be treated by the participant institution following a modified protocol based in the ERACS with the aid of a digital platform.
The assistance provided to patients in the intervention group will be sequential and prospective. The project will utilize an app based on protocols that prepare patients for rapid recovery (ERAS), starting before surgery and extending up to 30 days post-discharge. This includes pre-operative evaluations (dental, psychological, nutritional, and others), scheduling and confirming hospital admission, and following specific protocols during surgery and intensive care. The app aims to enhance communication and teamwork, improving patient-centered care. It will feature modules for patient and family education, team communication, and activity management through a dashboard. Additionally, it will facilitate interaction with patients through messages and surveys, monitor multidisciplinary team communication, and collect patient-reported outcomes 30 days after the surgical procedure.
Other Names:
  • ERACS
  • Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery
  • Digital ERAS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lenght of Stay
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
Compare the length of stay after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with versus without the use of a technology platform based on ERAS.
up to 30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Completeness of Protocol Steps
Time Frame: up to 01 week after surgery.
Compare adherence to protocol metrics through measure of the execution of the protocol steps by each participant center, during the intervention period. up to one week after surgery.
up to 01 week after surgery.
Morbility and Mortality
Time Frame: up to 6 months after surgery
Compare morbidity and mortality rates and hospital readmission between the control and intervention groups up to 6 months after CABG.
up to 6 months after surgery
Patient-reported outcomes (PROM)
Time Frame: up to 6 months after surgery

Evaluate and patient-reported outcome measures following the questionnaire published by Ben-Ali W, Lamarche Y, Carrier M, Demers P, Bouchard D, El-Hamamsy I, et al. Use of Mobile-Based Application for Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2021 Nov 1;16(6):536-44. at 01 month and 6 months after surgery.

This questionary assess self reported pain, quality of recovery, anxiety and engagement of the patient with his/her recovery.

up to 6 months after surgery
Patient reported experience measure(PREM)
Time Frame: up to 6 months after surgery
Assessment of patient experience using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey.
up to 6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5811/24/022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Surgery

Clinical Trials on ERACS with Digital Platform

Subscribe