Nature Image Exposure in Type 2 Diabetes

September 16, 2026 updated by: Hamdiye ARDA SÜRÜCÜ, Dicle University

Effects of Nature Image Exposure on Pain, Fear of Blood Glucose Testing and Fear of Self-injection in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Type 2 diabetes often requires repeated procedures, including insulin self-injection and self-monitoring of blood glucose. These procedures may cause pain and lead to fear of self-injection and blood glucose testing, which may negatively affect treatment adherence and diabetes self-management. Nature-based visual stimuli may serve as a simple, non-pharmacological distraction method by directing attention away from painful or fear-inducing procedures.

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of nature image exposure on pain, fear of self-injection, and fear of blood glucose testing in adults with type 2 diabetes. A total of 64 participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=32) or the control group (n=32). Participants in the intervention group viewed a standardized nature image displayed on a fixed wall-mounted screen for 3-5 minutes immediately before insulin self-injection and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Participants in the control group received standard care without nature image exposure. Outcomes were assessed using the Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire and the Visual Analog Scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study design This was a randomized controlled trial with blinded participants and blinded statistical analysis.

Setting and time The study was conducted between November 2023 and November 2024 in the Endocrinology Service Dicle University. The service consists of 8 rooms and 22 beds and is staffed by 5 faculty members, 4 residents, 1 diabetes education nurse, 9 clinical nurses, and 2 podologists. The diabetes education nurse provides individual education to all newly admitted patients with diabetes. This education includes insulin injection technique and rotation, insulin storage conditions, self-monitoring and follow-up, medical nutrition therapy, and exercise management. Education is also provided to patients' relatives.

Population and sample The study population consisted of 64 patients with type 2 diabetes who were followed in the Endocrinology Service of ---University -- between November 2023 and November 2024 and met the inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were: having been diagnosed with diabetes for at least one year, current use of insulin, ability to understand and speak Turkish, no prior exposure to nature image exposure interventions, performing insulin injections at least twice daily, and conducting blood glucose monitoring at least twice daily. Exclusion criteria included having a psychiatric diagnosis, refusal to participate, vertigo, visual or hearing impairment, and cognitive disability. Based on these criteria, eligible participants were identified, and a total of 64 patients were included in the study.

Sample size and power analysis Sample size estimation was performed a priori using G*Power version 3.1 [21] based on the fear of self-injection scale scores reported in the study by Aktura and Sarıtaş. [22] Assuming a large effect size (Cohen's d = 0.80), a statistical power of 80%, and a significance level of 5% (α = 0.05), the minimum required sample size was calculated as 42 participants, with at least 21 participants in each group. To compensate for potential participant loss and to increase the statistical robustness of the study, the sample size was expanded, and 32 participants were included in each group.

Blinding This was a randomized controlled trial in which participants were blinded to group allocation, and statistical analyses were performed by an independent statistician who was blinded to group assignments. However, outcome assessment and data collection were performed by the researcher, who was aware of group allocation; therefore, outcome assessors were not blinded.

Data collection instruments Data were collected using a Participant Information Form, the Diabetes Fear of Self-Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Di̇yarbakir
      • Diyarbakır, Di̇yarbakir, Turkey (Türkiye), 21280
        • Dicle University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least one year Current use of insulin Ability to understand and speak Turkish No previous exposure to a nature image exposure intervention Performing insulin self-injection at least twice daily Performing self-monitoring of blood glucose at least twice daily Willingness to participate and provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Poor mental health Having gestational diabetes mellitus or Type 1 Diabetes Vertigo Visual impairment Hearing impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nature Image Exposure Group

On Day 1, participants underwent routine self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection without any intervention, and baseline measurements were obtained. On Day 2, participants viewed a standardized, high-resolution nature-themed visual displayed on a fixed wall-mounted screen for 3-5 minutes immediately before self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection. Post-intervention measurements were then obtained using the same instruments.

Participants were individually exposed to a standardized, high-resolution nature-themed visual depicting natural environments such as forests, rivers, waterfalls, and green landscapes. The visual was displayed on a fixed wall-mounted screen in the diabetes education room for 3-5 minutes immediately before self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection. Environmental conditions were standardized, including uniform room lighting, minimal noise, a fixed seating position, and a consistent viewing distance. The visual display was removed immediately after each session.

No Intervention: Standard Care Control Group

Participants received standard care without nature image exposure. On Day 1, baseline measurements were obtained following routine self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection. On Day 2, participants continued routine self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection without any visual intervention, after which post-test measurements were obtained using the same instruments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Intensity Assessed Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline on Day 1 and post-intervention on Day 2, over two consecutive days

Pain intensity associated with self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10-cm (100-mm) horizontal line anchored by "no pain" at one end and "worst imaginable pain" at the other end. Participants marked the point that best represented their current pain intensity. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Baseline pain was assessed on Day 1 following routine self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection without any intervention. Post-intervention pain was assessed on Day 2 following nature image exposure and the procedures in the intervention group or following the same procedures under standard care in the control group.

Baseline on Day 1 and post-intervention on Day 2, over two consecutive days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fear of Self-Injection and Self-Testing Assessed Using the D-FISQ
Time Frame: Baseline on Day 1 and post-intervention on Day 2, over two consecutive days

Fear of self-injection and fear of blood glucose testing were assessed using the Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ). The questionnaire consists of 15 items and includes two subscales: fear of self-injecting (6 items) and fear of self-testing (9 items). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("almost never") to 3 ("almost always"). The fear of self-injecting subscale score ranges from 0 to 18, the fear of self-testing subscale score ranges from 0 to 27, and the total D-FISQ score ranges from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate greater fear. Baseline measurements were obtained on Day 1 following routine self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injection without any intervention. Post-intervention measurements were obtained on Day 2 following nature image exposure in the intervention group or standard care in the control group.

Baseline on Day 1 and post-intervention on Day 2, over two consecutive days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe