- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06800417
Performance and Safety of the Innofix® Screw (IF25) (IF25)
Performance and Safety of the Innofix® Screw as Part of Stabilization of a Non-displaced Pathologic Fracture (Complete or Impending) of the Pelvic Bone of Cancer Patients by Mini-invasive Percutaneous Fixation by Internal Cemented Screw
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to collect data about the safety and the performances of the InnoFix® screw : Clinical performances (Pain reduction due to the fracture treatment, maintenance of the stabilizaton of the treated fracture and mobility improvement) / Technical performances (Percutaneous implantation by mini-invasive approach, Efficiency of percutaneous implementation and efficiency of percuatneous cementing) / Safety performances (Preservation of the screw stability after implantation and preservation of the screw integrity after implantation). The safety and performance data about the InnoFix® screw will be used to obtain their CE marking according to the regulation (EU) 2017/745.
The principal objective of this clinical investigation is to assess the postoperative reduction in pain level of the patient at 6 weeks follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Frédéric DESCHAMPS
- Phone Number: +33 (0)1 42 11 42 11
- Email: frederic.deschamps@gustaveroussy.fr
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient is 18 years old or more
- The patient is a cancer patient
- The patient needs a stabilization of a non-displaced pathologic fracture (complete or impending) of the pelvic bone
- The patient is symptomatic with musculoskeletal pain exacerbated during movement or weight bearing
- The patient has been informed and he has signed the informed consent
- The patient must be willing and able to comply with all study requirements including follow-up visits and radiographic assessments
- The patient is affiliated with the French social security system
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient has got a displaced fracture or an unstable fracture justifying conventional surgical fixation
- The patient is a pregnant woman or considered getting pregnant during its investigation participation
- The patient presents medical conditions that could have an impact on the clinical investigation (under responsibility of the investigator)
- The patient has got one or more contraindications to general anaesthesia
- The patient has got an insufficient bone strength (severe osteoporosis, local infection, or tumor osteolysis) precluding a correct and long-term fixation
- The use of the InnoFix® screw can interfere with anatomical structures or physiological performances
- The patient has got an insufficient tissue coverage at the surgical site
- The patient has got a sepsis, fever, subcutaneous or cutaneous infection on the implantation way, deep abscess in contact with the fracture site
- The patient has got a mental or neuromuscular disorder that may cause fixation failure or postoperative complications
- The patient is allergic and/or hypersensitive to a component of the InnoFix® modules, of the InnoTool™ instruments and to the used cement
- The patient has got a haemostasis disorder ((INR >1.5, platelets <50x109/L)
- The patient participates to another clinical investigation
- The patient's life expectancy is lower than 6 months
- The patient is under guardianship, curatorship or legal protection
- The patient is deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adult cancer patient with a non-displaced pelvic pathologic fracture
The fracture of the patients, treated with InnoFix® screw, is stabilized with a percutaneous fixation by internal cemented screw.
This procedure is carried out by mini-invasive approach.
|
Percutaneous fixation by internal cemented screw
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of patients which have a pain reduction rate, at 6 weeks postoperatively, equal or superior to 30%
Time Frame: From the patient inclusion date to 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Pain reduction is measured with the VAS scale : Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain
|
From the patient inclusion date to 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of patients which have a pain reduction rate, at 6 months postoperatively, equal or superior to 30%
Time Frame: From the patient inclusion date to 6 months postoperatively
|
The pain is measured with the VAS scale: Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain
|
From the patient inclusion date to 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Rate of postoperative stable fractures
Time Frame: From end surgery to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
Fracture stability is assessed with medical imaging: Length of fracture line in millieter (complete fracture) or fracture occurernce (impending fracture)
|
From end surgery to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Rate of patients which have a mobility improvement rate postoperatively
Time Frame: From the patient inclusion date to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
Mobility is measured with ECOG scale:
|
From the patient inclusion date to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Implantation success rate of the InnoFix® screw
Time Frame: At the end of surgery
|
Implantation succes is measured with medical imaging: Screw position compared to the fracture line and distance, in millimeters, of the distal tip of screw compared to the planned area and protrusion, in millimeters, of the proximal part of screw from the external cortex
|
At the end of surgery
|
|
Satisfaction rate of the radiologist regarding the efficiency of the percutaneous implementation
Time Frame: At the end of surgery
|
Efficiency of percutaneous implementation is based on the experiency of the radaiologist
|
At the end of surgery
|
|
Satisfaction rate of the radiologist regarding the efficiency of the percutaneous cementing
Time Frame: At the end of surgery
|
Efficiency of percutaneous cementing is based on the experiency of the radaiologist
|
At the end of surgery
|
|
Rate of stable InnoFix® screws postoperatively
Time Frame: From end surgery to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
Screw stability is measured with medical imaging: Screw displacement in millimeters and contact with anatomical structures or other implanted devices
|
From end surgery to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Rate of InnoFix® screws with their integrity preserved postoperatively
Time Frame: From end surgery to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
Screw integrity is measured with medical imaging: Disassembly, breakage or bending in millimeters
|
From end surgery to 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Rate of patient which have had, at least, one adverse event in relation with the InnoFix® screw postoperatively
Time Frame: From the patient inclusion date to 6 months postoperatively
|
Adverse event reported
|
From the patient inclusion date to 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Rate of patient which have had, at least, one serious adverse event in relation with the InnoFix® screw postoperatively
Time Frame: From the patient inclusion date to 6 months postoperatively
|
Serious adverse event reported
|
From the patient inclusion date to 6 months postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lambros TSELIKAS, Gustave ROUSSY Cancer Institute - Villejuif
- Principal Investigator: Xavier BUY, BERGONIE Institute - Bordeaux
- Principal Investigator: Roberto Luigi CAZZATO, Strasbourg Civil Hospital - Strasbourg
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IF25
- 2025-A00016-43 (Registry Identifier: French clinical trials database [ANSM])
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pathologic Fracture
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingHip Fractures | Pathological Fracture | Pathological Fracture of Hip | Hip Fracture PathologicUnited States
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch; National Taiwan University...Not yet recruitingBone Metastases | Pathological Fracture | Pathological Fracture, Left Femur | Pathological Fracture, Right Femur
-
State University of New York - Upstate Medical...Not yet recruitingForearm Fracture
-
Rhode Island HospitalTerminatedForearm FractureUnited States
-
University of MalayaWithdrawn
-
Crosstrees Medical Inc.CompletedPathologic Fracture of the Vertebra Due to OsteoporosisUnited States
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreUnited States Department of Defense; McMaster UniversityCompletedSurgical Site Infection | Unplanned Fracture-Related Reoperation | Open Appendicular FractureUnited States, Canada, Spain
-
University of British ColumbiaUnknownPoint of Care Ultrasound | Colles Fracture | Emergency UltrasoundCanada
-
Nordsjaellands HospitalRecruitingColles' Fracture | Fracture Dislocation | Distal Radius Fractures | Closed Reduction of Fracture and Application of Plaster Cast | Fracture Dislocation of Upper Limb JointDenmark
-
University of Maryland, BaltimorePatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; McMaster UniversityCompletedSurgical Site Infection | Pelvic Fracture | Unplanned Fracture-Related Reoperation | Open Appendicular Fracture | Closed Lower Extremity FractureUnited States, Canada
Clinical Trials on Percutaneous fixation by internal cemented screw (InnoFix®)
-
153rd Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation ArmyCompleted
-
University Hospital, AkershusVestre Viken Hospital Trust; University of Oslo; Asker & Baerum Hospital; Sykehuset...UnknownFemoral Neck FracturesNorway