Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Acute Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures

Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Acute Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures With Simple Anterior Spinal Column Injury: a Retrospective, Self-controlled Trial

To validate the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in acute thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with simple anterior spinal column injury.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Vertebral Fracture
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: posterior percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation

Detailed Description

History and current related studies Thoracolumbar spinal fractures are frequently seen after trauma because of the biomechanical transitional junction of this structure. The primary treatment method used for traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fracture is posterior pedicle screw fixation, but this method has some disadvantages including severe trauma, extensive bleeding, long rehabilitation time, and long postoperative duration of intractable lumbar stiffness and low back pain. These complications occur mainly because of wide stripping and injury of the paraspinal muscles and peri-articular denervation. Percutaneous pedicle screw external fixation of spine fracture can reduce injury caused by screw insertion into the paraspinal muscles, particularly in the treatment of acute thoracolumbar vertebral compression fracture with simple anterior spinal column injury.

Adverse events We recorded possible adverse events, including wound pain, infection, back muscle pain, spinal cord/nerve injury, screw pull-out, or screw loosening. If severe adverse events occurred, details including the data of occurrence and measures taken to treat the adverse events were reported to the principle investigator and the institutional review board within 24 hours.

Possible biases and management measures Possible biases

• Diagnosis bias
• Admission rate bias (hospitalized patients were preferred to reduce loss to follow-up and to increase compliance)
• No response bias (subjects not responding to the questionnaire or not responding truthfully)
• Mixed bias (sex and age) Measures taken to control possible biases
• Formulation of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Ensuring sample independence
• Discussion of the mixed factors that may potentially influence the curative effects, such as pathological factors, course of disease, and sex

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed by a statistician using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Amrok, USA), and was conducted following the intention-to-treat principle. Normally distributed measurement data were expressed as the mean ± SD, and minimums and maximums. Non-normally distributed measurement data were expressed as lower quartile (q1), and median and upper quartile (q3). The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was performed for comparison of the Cobb angle before surgery with the Cobb angle 3 years after surgery, and the McNemar's chi-squared test was used to compare the incidence of adverse reactions. The significance level was α = 0.05.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 32
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 25 years to 47 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Meet the diagnostic criteria of acute thoracolumbar vertebral fracture with simple anterior spinal column injury as confirmed by radiography, CT and MRI
• AO classification type A
• Thoracolumbar injury severity score of 4-5 (Park et al., 2016)
• Traumatic fracture
• Age 25-47 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Fracture complicated by spinal cord injury
• Fracture complicated by nerve injury
• Refusal to provide informed consent

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: screw fixation; The patients underwent minimally invasive posterior percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation.	Procedure: posterior percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation; The patients underwent minimally invasive posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in acute thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with simple anterior spinal column injury.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The Cobb angle of the injured vertebral body	To investigate the change in the thoracolumbar spine curvature. A greater Cobb angle indicates more severe kyphosis.	before, immediately after, and 3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Anterior height of the injured vertebral body	To evaluate the morphological recovery of the thoracolumbar spine. A smaller anterior height of the injured vertebral body indicates less severe injury to the vertebral body.	before, immediately after, and 3 months after surgery
X-ray		before, immediately after, and 3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: 153rd Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Lei Liang, Master, PLA 153 Central Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: August 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2011
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 10, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 10, 2016
• First Posted (Estimate): November 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): November 15, 2016
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 10, 2016
• Last Verified: November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Spinal Injuries; Back Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Spinal Fractures
• Other Study ID Numbers: 153PLA_001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No