A Cohort Study on Biomarkers to Predict the Efficacy of Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

February 5, 2025 updated by: Beijing Tongren Hospital
Recently, several biologic therapies have become available for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, not every patient responds to these treatments. This clinical trial aims to develop a non-invasive predictive model to help determine how effective IL-4Rα targeted monoclonal antibody therapy will be for individuals with CRSwNP.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
        • Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-75 years old.
  2. With bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.
  3. Nasal Polyp Score ≥4 (minimum score of 2 per nasal cavity) at baseline.
  4. Nasal congestion score ≥2 at baseline.
  5. Patients who have received systemic corticosteroids (SCS) treatment within 2 years before screening, and/or have contraindications or intolerance to SCS treatment, and/or received surgical for nasal polyps more than 6 months before screening.
  6. Have been using intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before screening.
  7. Symptoms of nasal obstruction and additional symptoms such as loss of smell or rhinorrhea should be present for at least 4 weeks before screening.
  8. Good adherence.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not enough washing out period for prior biological therapy (within 10 weeks or 5 half-lives [whichever is longer] before baseline).
  2. Use of systemic immunosuppressants for inflammatory diseases or autoimmune diseases within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives before baseline (whichever is longer).
  3. Initiation of leukotriene receptor antagonist treatment, oral glucocorticoid treatment, or traditional Chinese medicine treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis within 4 weeks before baseline.
  4. Subjects who have undergone surgery that changed the nasal structure and cannot be evaluated for Nasal Polyp Score.
  5. Participants with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤50% of predicted normal during screening/run-in period.
  6. Hypersensitivity to MFNS or anti-IL-4R monoclonal antibodies or stapokibart components.
  7. Concomitant with other poorly controlled serious diseases or recurrent chronic diseases.
  8. Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning either during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: therapy group
Stapokibart subcutaneously every two weeks plus mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 μg once daily
Stapokibart subcutaneously every two weeks
mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 μg once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nasal Polyps Score (NPS)
Time Frame: week 16
NPS score ranges from 0-8 (sum of 0-4 for each nasal), higher score means a worse outcome.
week 16
Nasal Congestion Score (NCS)
Time Frame: week 16
Change from baseline in the Nasal Congestion Score (NCS) at week 16. NCS score range from 0 to 3, with higher score means worse nasal symptom.
week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)
Time Frame: Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Changes from baseline in nasal polyp score (NPS) at each evaluation time point. NPS score ranges from 0-8 (sum of 0-4 for each nasal), higher score means a worse outcome.
Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Nasal Congestion Score (NCS)
Time Frame: Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Changes from baseline in nasal congestion score (NCS) at each evaluation time point. NCS score range from 0 to 3, with higher score means worse nasal symptom.
Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22)
Time Frame: Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Changes from baseline in sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) score at each evaluation time point. The SNOT-22 score is the sum of the scores of 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate worse outcomes).
Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
nasal total symptom score (TSS)
Time Frame: Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Changes from baseline in nasal total symptom score (TSS) at each evaluation timepoint. The evaluation content of TSS includes three aspects: nasal congestion, loss of smell and running nose. Each aspect has a score of 0-3 with a total score of 0-9. The higher score indicates the more severe overall symptom.
Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6)
Time Frame: Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Changes from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) at each evaluation timepoint for participants with asthma. The ACQ-6 is a questionnaire used to evaluate the degree of asthma control. Each question is scored from 0 to 6 according to its severity. The higher the score, the less satisfactory symptom control is.
Week 2,4,8,12,20,24,28,32,36,40
Lund-Mackay CT score
Time Frame: week 16
Change from baseline in Lund-Mackay CT score evaluated by sinus computed tomography (CT) at each evaluation timepoint. The total Lund-Mackay score ranges from 0 to 24 points. The six parts of the nasal sinuses on both sides are evaluated separately. The higher the score, the more severe the CRS condition.
week 16
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: week 16
Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at each evaluation timepoint for participants with asthma.
week 16
Change of NPS
Time Frame: Week 2,4,8,12,16
Proportion of participants with ≥1 point improvement from baseline in NPS at each evaluation timepoint. Proportion of participants with ≥2 point improvement from baseline in NPS at each evaluation timepoint.
Week 2,4,8,12,16
Change of NCS
Time Frame: Week 2,4,8,12,16
Proportion of participants with ≥1 point improvement from baseline in NCS at each evaluation timepoint. Proportion of participants with ≥2 point improvement from baseline in NCS at each evaluation timepoint.
Week 2,4,8,12,16
Pharmacodynamics
Time Frame: Week 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40
Change from baseline in serum biomarker level (eosinophil level).
Week 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40
Pharmacodynamics
Time Frame: week 16
Change from baseline of eosinophil level in nasal polyps biospy tissue.
week 16
The change of biomarkers
Time Frame: Week 8,16,24,32,40
Changes from baseline of expression levels of biomarker in nasal brush exfoliated cells, nasal secretions and nasal microbes.
Week 8,16,24,32,40
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: week 16
Change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC) at each evaluation timepoint for participants with asthma.
week 16
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: week 16
Change from baseline in mean flow with forced expiratory volume of 25% ~ 75% vital capacity (FEF25 ~ 75%) at each evaluation timepoint for participants with asthma.
week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biomarkers

Clinical Trials on Stapokibart

Subscribe