The Effect of Nurse-led Video-assisted Discharge Training on Anxiety and Readiness for Discharge After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

January 28, 2025 updated by: HATİCE DEMİRDAĞ, Uskudar University

The Effect of Nurse-led Video-assisted Discharge Training on Anxiety and Readiness for Discharge

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of nurse-led video-assisted discharge education on discharge readiness and anxiety in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

The main questions that are aimed to be answered are:

Is there a difference between the discharge readiness levels of patients who received video-assisted discharge training and patients who received classical discharge training?

Is there a difference between the anxiety levels of patients receiving video-assisted discharge training and patients receiving classical discharge training?

Participants:

Experimental group Patients in the intervention group were administered the Readiness for Discharge scale and the State Anxiety Scale on the morning of discharge. Afterwards, the discharge training video prepared by the researchers was sent to their cell phones and they were allowed to watch it with the nurse. The researcher also encouraged the patients to ask questions when they did not understand a topic. Since the video remained on the patient's phone, they could watch it again after discharge. After the training, Discharge Readiness Scale and State Anxiety Scale were administered again.

Control group On the morning of discharge, patients in the control group were administered the Readiness for Discharge Scale and State Anxiety Inventory. The clinic nurse then gave discharge training, which is a clinical routine. After the training, the Readiness for Discharge Scale and State Anxiety Inventory were administered again.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Type of Research This study is a quasi-experimental controlled design. Patients who underwent CABG surgery were divided into 2 groups as patients who received standard discharge training and patients who received video-assisted discharge training.

Place and Sample of the Study The study was conducted between January and October 2023 in a Thoracic-Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital in Istanbul. G*Power version 3.1 was used to calculate the sample size. According to the results of Weiss (2010), the sample size was calculated as 88, 44 intervention and 44 control, with an effect size of 0.32, a significance level (α) of 0.05, an expected power of 0.80, and an effect size estimate of 0.30. The study included 89 patients, 44 in the experimental and 45 in the control groups, who met the inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria; over the age of 18, good mental health, speak Turkish, have no hearing or vision problems, have had first coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Data Collection Tools Data were collected using Patient Information Form, Discharge Readiness Scale and State Anxiety Scale.

Patient Information Form: It was prepared by the researchers in line with the relevant literature. The form includes questions about age, gender, marital status, educational status, occupation, place of residence, income status, social security status, presence of an additional disease, smoking, with whom they live at home, presence of a caregiver at home, height, weight, date of hospitalisation, date of surgery, date of discharge.

Discharge Readiness Scale:

The 22-item scale developed by Weiss et al. in 2006 was revised by Weiss et al. in 2014 to consist of eight questions and four subscales (32). It has personal status, knowledge, coping and expected support subscales. The eight questions in the scale are evaluated with scores between 0-10, ranging from low to high. Each measurement is divided into four levels as 9-10 (very high), 8-8.9 (high), 7-7.9 (medium) and <7 (low) (Weiss et al., 2014). The first and second questions measure how the patient feels during the day, the third and fourth questions measure their knowledge about discharge, the fifth and sixth questions measure how and to what extent they can continue their daily life at home after discharge, and the seventh and eighth questions measure the support they can receive at home after discharge (30). The Turkish validity and reliability of this scale developed by Weiss et al. was performed by Kaya et al. in 2017 and the Cronbach α reliability coefficient was found to be 0.74, while this value varied between 0.79-0.93 in subscales (32).

State Anxiety Scale: The scale analyses individuals' state anxiety at a certain time and under a certain condition.

It evaluates how they feel themselves. The scale consists of 20 items with a 4-point Likert-type rating. Scores between 20-80 are obtained from the scale. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety. Internal consistency and reliability of the Turkish form ranged between 0.94 and 0.96 with alpha reliability.38 In this study, the Cronbach's alpha value for the State Anxiety Scale was 0.93, while it was 0.89 for this study.

Intervention The researchers developed a training content by utilising various sources and consulting expert opinions. DISCERN (quality criteria for consumer health information) tool was used to evaluate the information quality of the training content and 5 expert opinions were obtained and the training content was finalised in line with the suggestions. In the training content, the problems that patients may experience in the postoperative period, postoperative interventions (movement, breathing and cough exercises), control times, nutrition, do's and don'ts and other nursing care issues were included. The content of the training video prepared according to the DISCERN scale was found to be sufficient. Then, the training content was converted into a video training given by the nurse researcher.

Collection of data Patients who underwent CABG surgery were informed about the study on the day they came to the clinic and their consent was obtained. The Patient Information Form was first applied to the patients who agreed to participate in the study. Randomisation method was not used to prevent the patients from being affected from each other. The first 44 patients were included in the experimental group and the next 45 patients were included in the control group. Data were obtained using face-to-face interview technique. The information that the patient would be discharged was obtained from the clinic secretary or the nurse working that day.

Experimental group Patients included in the intervention group were administered the Readiness for Discharge Scale and State Anxiety Scale on the morning of discharge. Afterwards, the discharge training video prepared by the researchers was sent to their mobile phones and they were allowed to watch it accompanied by a nurse. The researcher also encouraged the patients to ask questions when they did not understand a topic. Since the video remained on the patient's mobile phone, they could watch it at any time after discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

89

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • İstanbul
      • Üsküdar, İstanbul, Turkey, 34672
        • Hatice Demirdağ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First coronary artery bypass graft surgeryi, good mental health, could speak Turkish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • had hearing or vision problem

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Video assisted discharge training group
The researchers developed a training content by utilizing various sources and consulting expert opinions. DISCERN (quality criteria for consumer health information) tool was used to evaluate the information quality of the educational content and 5 expert opinions were obtained and the educational content was finalized in line with the suggestions. The training content included the problems that patients may experience in the postoperative period, postoperative interventions (movement, breathing and cough exercises), control times, nutrition, do's and don'ts and other nursing care issues. The content of the training video prepared according to the DISCERN scale was found to be sufficient. The training content was then converted into a video training given by the nurse researcher.
The researchers developed a training content by utilizing various sources and consulting expert opinions. DISCERN (quality criteria for consumer health information) tool was used to evaluate the information quality of the educational content and 5 expert opinions were obtained and the educational content was finalized in line with the suggestions. The training content included the problems that patients may experience in the postoperative period, postoperative interventions (movement, breathing and cough exercises), control times, nutrition, do's and don'ts and other nursing care issues. The content of the training video prepared according to the DISCERN scale was found to be sufficient. The training content was then converted into a video training given by the nurse researcher.
No Intervention: Control group
Patients will receive routine discharge training in the clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: Postoperative 30 day
State anxiety scale score
Postoperative 30 day
Discharge readiness
Time Frame: Postoperative 30 day
Discharge readiness scale score
Postoperative 30 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: HATİCE DEMİRDAĞ, Uskudar University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • do362957

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Video assisted discharge training

Subscribe