The Effect of Video-assisted Episiotomy Repair Training on Anxiety and Self-efficacy Levels in Midwifery Students

February 21, 2025 updated by: Amasya University

The Effect of Video-assisted Episiotomy Repair Training on Anxiety and Self-efficacy Levels in Midwifery Students: a Randomized Controlled Study

The goal of midwifery undergraduate education is; To provide students with basic professional knowledge, skills and attitudes in cognitive, affective and psychomotor dimensions. Various practices are used to provide students with midwifery skills. Case studies, maintenance processes, laboratory applications, field studies, simulation application and video monitoring are some of these applications. Each of these approaches, which are especially preferred in applied courses, has an important place in increasing students' self-efficacy and reducing their anxiety. Episiotomy is one of the obstetric interventions that negatively affects the self-efficacy of midwifery students and causes anxiety. Midwives are responsible for performing and caring for episiotomy. In many countries, episiotomy repair training is given to midwifery students using sponges or models. However, today the use of calf tongue, which is very similar to perineal tissue, has become widespread. There are a limited number of studies in the literature using calf tongue simulation. These studies suggested that the practice improved the skills of midwifery students. No study has been found in the literature using video-assisted episiotomy repair training.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical interventions in normal vaginal birth. Episiotomy, also known as perineotomy, can be defined as an incision made in the perineum to ensure easy delivery of the fetus, shorten the active phase of labor, prevent lacerations, and protect the perineal tissue and anal sphincter. This procedure is a surgical intervention applied to the bulbo-cavernos muscle located in the perineum in the second phase of labor. It can be said that episiotomy has become widespread as a result of medicalization in birth, as in all areas of health. In particular, moving births from homes to hospital environments can be cited as one of the leading reasons for the increase in episiotomy rates. Routine episiotomy may cause pelvic organ prolapse and damage the muscles in the anal sphincters and perineal structure. In addition, studies on the subject have shown that episiotomy may be associated with problems such as postpartum pain, dyspareunia and incontinence. It is also known that the rate of perineal trauma is high in countries where episiotomy is frequently performed. For this reason, episiotomy, which is basically done to prevent uncontrolled damage that may occur in the perineal area, is not routinely preferred today. The recommendation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) regarding episiotomy is as follows: Episiotomy may be preferred in cases of risk arising from the mother or the baby, such as protecting against perineal tears that may occur in the mother during vaginal birth, facilitating or accelerating birth, but its use should be limited in cases where it is not necessary.

Self-efficacy is defined as the individual's beliefs about his ability to perform significantly in events that will affect his life. Self-efficacy perception determines how individuals feel, think, motivate themselves and behave. It is known that motivation increases as the level of self-efficacy increases). It has also been reported that individuals with high self-efficacy have a higher potential to cope with problems, experience less stress and anxiety, and make more effort to achieve their desired results. It is estimated that people with low self-efficacy often experience stress, anxiety and depression, and their academic and social success decreases. As a matter of fact, some studies have found that the academic performance of university students increases in parallel with their self-efficacy score averages.

The goal of midwifery undergraduate education is; To provide students with basic professional knowledge, skills and attitudes in cognitive, affective and psychomotor dimensions. Various practices are used to provide students with midwifery skills. Case studies, maintenance processes, laboratory applications, field studies, simulation application and video monitoring are some of these applications. Each of these approaches, which are especially preferred in applied courses, has an important place in increasing students' self-efficacy and reducing their anxiety. Episiotomy is one of the obstetric interventions that negatively affects the self-efficacy of midwifery students and causes anxiety. Midwives are responsible for performing and caring for episiotomy. In many countries, episiotomy repair training is given to midwifery students using sponges or models. However, today the use of calf tongue, which is very similar to perineal tissue, has become widespread. There are a limited number of studies in the literature using calf tongue simulation. These studies suggested that the practice improved the skills of midwifery students. No study has been found in the literature using video-assisted episiotomy repair training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Center
      • Amasya, Center, Turkey, 05000
        • Amasya University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Midwifery students who are studying in the 3rd year, have taken the normal birth and postpartum period course and are registered for the risky birth and postpartum period course
  • Those who volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who did not agree to participate in the research
  • Those who have an active working life as midwives

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Standard episiotomy repair training will be given to the students in the experimental group using the calf tongue simulator. After the theoretical phase is completed, the implementation phase will begin. During the application period (practical phase), students in this group will be shown a 'video recording' of episiotomy repair prepared by the researchers as educational material. Thus, students in the experimental group will be able to watch episiotomy repairs whenever and however many times they want, in addition to researcher support throughout the application, and improve their application skills.
Midwifery Intervention The 'video recording' prepared by researchers specialized in the field of midwifery to increase the episiotomy repair skills of midwifery students will be used as training material. The content of the video recording is as follows: control before episiotomy repair, episiotomy repair, subcutaneous suturing, skin suturing, suturing techniques (Continuous, Simple Intermittent, Mattress). After the video recording is completed, it will be restarted and shown to the students in the experimental group continuously throughout the application period. At the end of the application period, students will be re-evaluated.
No Intervention: Control group
Students in the control group will be given standard episiotomy repair training using the calf tongue simulator. After the theoretical phase is completed, the implementation phase will begin. Researcher support will be provided throughout the implementation period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
State Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Scoring is as follows: "1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=A lot and 4=Completely." There are two types of expressions in the scale: direct and reverse. Items 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, 20 are scored in reverse. Direct expressions express negative emotions; Inverted expressions contain positive emotions. The scores obtained from the scale theoretically range between 20 and 80. High scores from the scale indicate high anxiety level, low scores indicate low anxiety level.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The scale consists of 19 items and two subscales: 'episiotomy preparation and application' and 'episiotomy control'. For each item on the Likert-type scale, "1" is given for the "strongly disagree" response, "2" is given for the "disagree" response, "3" is given for the "agree" response, and "4" is given for the "strongly agree" response. There are no reverse coded items in the scale. The total score varies between 19 and 76. High scores from the scale indicate a high level of self-efficacy for episiotomy skills.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AmasyaU-betuluzun-004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Episiotomy Wound

Clinical Trials on Video assisted episiotomy repair training

Subscribe