Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime Avibactam Versus Extended Infusions of High Dose Meropenem in Patients of ACLF With Nosocomial Infections.

Acute on chronic liver failure patients are at high risk for nosocomial infections due to liver dysfunction, which impairs immune responses and increases vulnerability to infections. Key factors contributing to nosocomial infections in ACLF patients include ascites, use of invasive devices, and recent hospitalization, frequent need for broad spectrum antibiotics. Multidrug resistance is a growing issue, making treatment more challenging, common pathogens involved are gram negative bacteria such as Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Surveillance data show increasing carbapenem resistant enterobacterales (CRE) infection rates in cirrhotics, with high morbidity and mortality rates. The impact of these nosocomial infections is profound, significantly worsen outcomes in ACLF patients, leading to prolonged hospitalizations, increased health care costs and higher mortality rates. Early detection and effective antibiotic stewardship are essential to manage antibiotic resistance and improve patient outcomes. In this study we aim to compare efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime avibactam versus extended infusions of high dose Meropenem in patients of ACLF with nosocomial infections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis - We hypothesize that ceftazidime-avibactum would be superior and an effective carbapenem sparing agent compared to extended high dose carbapenems as empirical therapy in management of nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organisms in patients with ACLF.

Aim -To compare the efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime avibactam and extended infusions of high dose Meropenem as emperical antibiotic in patients of ACLF with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organisms.

Primary objective:

• To compare the efficacy of Ceftazidime avibactam over extended infusions of high dose carabapenem as emperical antibiotic in achieving clinical response at day 3 in patients of ACLF with suspected nosocomial infections.

Secondary objectives:

  • To study the spectrum of nosocomial infections, bacterial DNA and resistance genes in the context of nosocomial infections in ACLF
  • Proportion of patients requiring escalation/de-escalation of antibiotics at day 3
  • Incidence of clinical and microbiologic response at day 5 and day 7
  • Time to escalation of antibiotics in both groups
  • Transfer to icu, mortality, and progression of organ failures and worsening of AARC scores by grade I, SOFA score by point 2.
  • Microbiologic outcome (Eradication/Persistence)
  • To identify biomarkers of host response to empirical antibiotic regimen
  • Transplant free survival at day 15 and day 28
  • Proportion of patients made eligible for transplant day 7. A prospective, Randomized Control Trial. Single centre, Open label, Block randomization will be done, it will be implemented by IWRS method. This study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology, ILBS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
        • Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. ACLF as per APASL criteria
  3. ACLF patients with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organism (defined as suspected or documented evidence of infection after 48 hours of hospitalization) requiring antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe septic shock with MOF requiring escalation of antibiotics
  2. Patients having known allergies to meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam
  3. Culture sensitivity showing isolate non susceptible to study drug being investigated.
  4. Already on either regimen, receiving meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam >48 hours.
  5. On mechanical ventilator support PF ratio < 300.
  6. Patients on immunosuppression medication
  7. HCC or other malignancies
  8. CKD
  9. CAD
  10. Pregnancy or Lactation
  11. Post Liver Transplantation
  12. Refusal to consent
  13. PLWHA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Meropenem
Meropenem 2gm TDS over 3 hours infusion Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD for 3 doses f/b 400 mg iv OD
Meropenem 2 gm iv TDS
Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD
Experimental: Ceftazidime avibactam
Ceftazidime avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS. Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD for 3 doses f/b 400 mg iv OD
Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD
Ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of ACLF patients with nosocomial infection by carbapenem resistant organisms showing clinical response at the end of treatment.
Time Frame: Day 3
Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to escalation or descalation of antibiotics
Time Frame: within 3 days
within 3 days
Progression in terms of organ dysfunction/failure at day 5 and 7.
Time Frame: day 5 and 7
day 5 and 7
Incidence of adverse events in both groups.
Time Frame: within 7 to 10 days
within 7 to 10 days
Duration of hospital and ICU stay
Time Frame: day 28
day 28
Mortality at day 15 and day 28
Time Frame: day 15 & 28
day 15 & 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

Clinical Trials on Meropenem Injection

Subscribe