- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06828627
Laparoscopic Total Left-sided Surgical Approach Versus Traditional Bilateral Surgical Approach for Hiatal Hernia
Laparoscopic Total Left-sided Surgical Approach Versus Traditional Bilateral Surgical Approach for Treating Hiatal Hernia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: In China, guidelines for the treatment of hiatal hernia (HH) are lacking. Furthermore, efficacy and safety assessments of surgical approaches for HH and for the protection of the vagus nerve and organ function are needed. Therefore, the present clinical trial is being conducted to establish the normative treatment for HH. Methods: The current trial is an ongoing, single-center, randomized controlled trial of patients with HH. The total sample size required for the trial (July 2020-December 2023) is approximately 114 patients.
Patients will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group (total left-sided surgical approach; TLSA) or a control group (traditional bilateral surgical approach; TBSA) at a ratio of 1:1 using the block randomization method. We will use case report forms (CRFs) and electronic data capture (EDC) systems to obtain demographic information, preoperative laboratory tests, auxiliary examination results, operation information, and postoperative condition. The patients will be followed up for 3 years after surgery. The primary endpoint is the gastrointestinal quality-of-life index (GIQLI) at 1 year. The secondary endpoints include an efficacy evaluation index [consisting of the incidence of gallstones and gastric emptying disorders, gastrointestinal function recovery time, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, objective evaluation of postoperative indices, and surgical information] and a safety evaluation index (consisting of the incidence of postoperative complications, the 30-day postoperative mortality rate, and the HH recurrence rate at 1 and 3 years after surgery). Discussion: TLSA can protect the normal physiological function of organs to a certain extent by protecting the vagus nerve from injury, and has satisfactory short- and long-term efficacy. There is no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and surgical safety between TLSA and TBSA. Our findings will facilitate clinical decision-making for HH and improve the life quality of patients.
Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000034028 (registration date: June 21, 2020). Keywords: Hiatal hernia (HH); surgical approach; efficacy; safety; randomized controlled trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100050
- Beijing Friendship Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (I) HH (type II/III/IV) diagnosed by gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry, and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.
(II) Aged 18-65 years, with no sex restrictions. (III) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of ≤2 points and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≤2 points.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (I) patients with cerebrovascular injury that occurred within the 6 months prior, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction; (II) patients with a history of uncontrolled epilepsy, central nervous system disease, or malignant tumor, or those with impaired judgment or mental illness who cannot cooperate with the research (III) patients with a history of digestive system tumors, or thoracic or abdominal surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Total left-sided surgical approach; TLSA
TLSA surgery procedure. (A) On the greater curvature of the stomach, the gastrocolic ligament is incised along the avascular area between the left and right gastric omentum vessels, and the gastric fundus is separated upward to the cardia to protect the vagus nerve. (B) The cardia, lower esophagus, and diaphragm is exposed, and the confluence of the left and right crus of the diaphragm is revealed. The retroperitoneum at the left and right crus of the diaphragm is incised, and the lower esophagus is dissociated for about 3-5 cm. The gastric fundus and the posterior wall of the esophagus are fully dissociated from the upper spleen. (C) Non-absorbable thread is used to intermittently suture the left and right crus of diaphragm in order to reconstruct the esophagus hiatus with a diameter of about 1.5 cm. (D) Then, the surgeon inserts the patch and fixes it on the crus of diaphragm if the hiatal hernia is larger than 5 cm or the diaphragm on both sides is weak. (E) A small incision |
TLSA surgery procedure. (A) On the greater curvature of the stomach, the gastrocolic ligament is incised along the avascular area between the left and right gastric omentum vessels, and the gastric fundus is separated upward to the cardia to protect the vagus nerve. (B) The cardia, lower esophagus, and diaphragm is exposed, and the confluence of the left and right crus of the diaphragm is revealed. The retroperitoneum at the left and right crus of the diaphragm is incised, and the lower esophagus is dissociated for about 3-5 cm. The gastric fundus and the posterior wall of the esophagus are fully dissociated from the upper spleen. (C) Non-absorbable thread is used to intermittently suture the left and right crus of diaphragm in order to reconstruct the esophagus hiatus with a diameter of about 1.5 cm. (D) Then, the surgeon inserts the patch and fixes it on the crus of diaphragm if the hiatal hernia is larger than 5 cm or the diaphragm on both sides is weak. (E) A small incisio |
|
Active Comparator: Traditional bilateral surgical approach; TBSA
Traditional bilateral surgical approach (TBSA) surgery procedure.
(A) Separation is initiated from the avascular area of the lesser omentum, and the hepatic branch of vagus nerve is preserved as far as possible.
Careful separation is performed upward to expose the right crus of diaphragm.
(B) At the greater curvature of the stomach, two to three short gastric vessels are cut off to expose the left crus of diaphragm, and the space between the anterior and posterior of esophagus is dissociated.
(C) The diaphragmatic esophageal membrane is incised and the lower part of the esophagus is dissociated about 4-5 cm, then the gastroesophageal valve flap is reformed and the His angle is restored.
During the operation, it mainly protects the anterior and posterior trunk of the vagus nerve.
The anterior and posterior trunk of the vagus nerve are mainly protected during the operation.
(D) Both sides of the crus of the diaphragm are intermittently sutured with non-absorbable thread to recons
|
Traditional bilateral surgical approach (TBSA) surgery procedure.
(A) Separation is initiated from the avascular area of the lesser omentum, and the hepatic branch of vagus nerve is preserved as far as possible.
Careful separation is performed upward to expose the right crus of diaphragm.
(B) At the greater curvature of the stomach, two to three short gastric vessels are cut off to expose the left crus of diaphragm, and the space between the anterior and posterior of esophagus is dissociated.
(C) The diaphragmatic esophageal membrane is incised and the lower part of the esophagus is dissociated about 4-5 cm, then the gastroesophageal valve flap is reformed and the His angle is restored.
During the operation, it mainly protects the anterior and posterior trunk of the vagus nerve.
The anterior and posterior trunk of the vagus nerve are mainly protected during the operation.
(D) Both sides of the crus of the diaphragm are intermittently sutured with non-absorbable thread to reconst
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
gastrointestinal quality-of-life index (GIQLI)
Time Frame: postoperative 1-year
|
GIQLI is related to the QOL for gastrointestinal disorders.
It contains 5 subscales, with a total score of 144 points.
The higher the score, the better the patient's QOL and the better the surgical effect.
|
postoperative 1-year
|
|
esophagitis
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
|
varified by gastroscopy (LA-standard)
|
3 years after surgery
|
|
DeMeester score
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
|
varified by high-resolution esophageal manometry and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring; >4% indicate abnormal acid reflux
|
3 years after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Incidence of gallstones
Time Frame: postoperative 3-year
|
postoperative 3-year
|
|
Incidence of gastric emptying disorders
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
|
1 year after surgery
|
|
gastrointestinal function recovery time
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
|
3 years after surgery
|
|
blood glucose
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
|
3 years after surgery
|
|
serum lipid levels
Time Frame: 3 years after surgery
|
3 years after surgery
|
|
operation time
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment
|
|
blood loss
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment
|
|
abdominal drainage fluid volume,
Time Frame: From treatment to 30-days after surgery
|
From treatment to 30-days after surgery
|
|
total duration of hospitalization
Time Frame: From treatment to 30-days after surgery
|
From treatment to 30-days after surgery
|
|
incidence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: From treatment to 30-days after surgery
|
From treatment to 30-days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ChiCTR2000034028
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hiatal Hernia
-
University Hospital, BordeauxRecruiting
-
University of NebraskaLifeCellCompletedHiatal Hernia | Esophageal Hernia | Hernia, Esophageal | Hernia, Paraesophageal | Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia | Sliding Esophageal Hernia | Sliding Hiatal HerniaUnited States
-
Foregut Research FoundationRecruitingParaesophageal Hernia | Large Hiatal HerniaUnited States
-
Prof Urs ZinggEnrolling by invitationHiatal Hernia Large
-
Oulu University HospitalCentral Finland Hospital DistrictRecruitingRecurrence | Hiatal Hernia | Hiatal Hernia, Paraesophageal | Paraesophageal HerniaFinland
-
University of WashingtonSynovis Surgical InnovationsCompletedHiatal HerniaUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineMusculoskeletal Transplant FoundationCompleted
-
Zagazig UniversityCompleted
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompleted
-
Miromatrix Medical Inc.Completed