Steroid Treatment for Meatal Stenosis

Topical Steroid Treatment for Meatal Stenosis: Clinical Outcomes and Uroflowmetry Assessment of Treatment Success

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the efficacy of topical steroid treatment for meatal stenosis.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Is steroid therapy effective for treatment of meatal stenosis? Participants already treated for meatal stenosis will be included.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sancaktepe
      • Istanbul, Sancaktepe, Turkey, 34000
        • Sancaktepe Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study included patients who were treated for meatal stenosis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of meatal stenosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any anatomical problem or history of surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Topical steroid
Betamethasone 0.1% cream was administered to the external meatus twice per day for a duration of 21 days.
Meatotomy

In the event of steroid therapy failure, a meatotomy was performed under general anesthesia. The procedure involved squashing the ventral aspect of the pinpoint meatus for approximately 3-5 millimeters for 10 seconds and then incising it. The mucosal margins were sutured with absorbable sutures to avoid renarrowing.

Urethral catheterization was not employed, and the procedure was performed on an outpatient basis. Patients were discharged following urination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients who showed significant clinical improvement over the course of the study
Time Frame: 2 months
The resolution of symptoms such as straining, hesitancy, interrupted voiding, thin urine stream, and storage symptoms (e.g., urgency, frequency, urge incontinence) along with improved urination were considered indicators of treatment success. All patients underwent assessment through physical examination and observation of the urinary stream during micturition.
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of participants who exhibited treatment-related improvements in voiding curve pattern and maximal urine flow rate, as assessed by uroflowmetry, which measures the free flow of urine during micturition
Time Frame: 2 months

Uroflowmetry is a diagnostic test that evaluates the flow of urine during micturition (urination), providing valuable insights into bladder function and obstruction.

The voiding curve pattern refers to the shape and flow characteristics of the urine stream during urination. A normal voiding pattern typically presents a bell shape, reflecting a steady and consistent flow of urine without interruptions. However, in certain conditions, such as urinary tract obstruction or bladder dysfunction, the voiding curve may become irregular, showing reduced flow or intermittent pauses. A plateau-shaped voiding curve is typically observed in conditions like meatal stenosis. Improvement in the voiding curve pattern following treatment indicates that urine flow has become more consistent and efficient.

Maximal urine flow rate (Qmax) is the highest rate at which urine is expelled during micturition. This measurement is important for assessing bladder function and identifying potential urinary flow iss

2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meatal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Betamethasone Cream

Subscribe