Impact of a Physical Exercise Program in a Rural Area

April 27, 2026 updated by: CARMEN GARCÍA GOMARIZ, University of Valencia

Impact of a Physical Exercise Program on the Physical, Podiatric and Mental Health of the Adult Population in a Rural Area

With this work we want to assess whether there are differences in the amount of physical activity per week, measured by accelerometry in 3 groups of subjects, where one group (G1) has been carrying out a PA program called "Enguera Sé Saludable" for a year. another group (G2) newly introduced to the same exercise program, and a control group (G3) that does not carry out an exercise program but declared itself active.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Active aging, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), involves making the most of everything that contributes to physical, mental and social well-being throughout life, thus promoting improved quality of life, functionality and longevity in the most advanced stages of life, seeking to minimize disability. To achieve active aging, older people must remain active in all aspects: physical, social and mental. For this reason, the WHO recommends that older adults engage in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) of 150 minutes a week The objetive, To assess whether there are differences in the amount of MVPA per week, measured by accelerometry in 3 groups of subjects, where one group (G1) had been carrying out a PA program called "Enguera Sé Saludable" for a year, another group (G2 ) newly inserted into the same exercise program, and a control group (G3) that did not carry out an exercise program but declared itself active.

Analytical quasi-experimental study, with 3 groups. A group (G1) over 59 years of age, of both sexes who have been doing PA since the year before the start of the study, within the "Enguera Be Healthy" Program in the municipality of Enguera. Another group (G2) of both sexes, newly enrolled in the same exercise program over 59 years of age. A control group (G3) of 59 years of both sexes who do not carry out the exercise program, inhabitants of Enguera and apparently active. The data analyzed was obtained from the placement of an Actigraph model GT3X BT accelerometer for a week and the collection of data from the various instruments such as the measurement of blood pressure and weight using the Tanita BC Scale. -545N, the Tinetti scale, the Time Up & Go test, the Monopodal Test, the SPPB test, the Sit to Stand Test, the Borg scale, the IPAQ questionnaire and the FHSQ questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults over 59 years of age.
  • Patients who comply with accelerometer times for 7 days.
  • Patients who correctly complete the accelerometer registration sheet.
  • Patients who complete the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not wear the accelerometer 600 minutes a day for at least 3 days on weekdays and 480 minutes for at least 1 day on the weekend.
  • Patients who suffer from illness during data collection.
  • Patients who do not wear the accelerometer for 7 days. Be in IPAQ category 1 (low level of AF).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: Exercise T0
Carrying out an exercise program one year in progress
Multimodal and multicompetent exercise program 2 days a week for 60 minutes and 1 day of walking exercise for 60 minutes.
Experimental: Exercise T1
Carrying out an exercise program without prior exercise
Multimodal and multicompetent exercise program 2 days a week for 60 minutes and 1 day of walking exercise for 60 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MVPA
Time Frame: 1 year
Mooderate to vigorous amount of activity. Assess the amount of moderate to vigorous exercise during accelerometry for one week.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Up & Go
Time Frame: 1 year

Evaluate basic mobility in older people and their probable gait and balance disorders. 1. Tell the elderly person to sit in the chair with their back supported by the backrest.

2. Ask the person to get up from the chair, walk at a normal pace for a distance of 3 meters, have the person turns around, walks back to the chair and sits down again. 3. Measure the time the older person takes the test. Timing begins when the person He starts to get up from the chair and ends when he returns to the chair and sits down.

4. Give a test try Normal: <10 seconds.

  • Mild mobility disability: 11-13 seconds.
  • High risk of falls: >13 seconds
1 year
Tinetti
Time Frame: 1 year
Test that analyzes certain variables to evaluate gait and balance. The higher the score, the better the performance. The highest score of the gait subscale is 12, for balance 16. The sum of both scores for fall risk. The higher the score>the lower the risk <19 High risk of falls
1 year
SPBB
Time Frame: 1 YEAR

Short Physical Performance Battery is an instrument that evaluates three aspects of mobility: balance, walking speed and strength of movement.

limbs or lower extremities to get up from a chair. Supports the probable detection of outcomes adverse events such as mortality and institutionalization, as well as their association with disability.

1 YEAR
Sit to Stand Test
Time Frame: 1 year
Assesses the functional strength of the lower limbs, A chair was required on a flat surface and the subject was asked not to lean on his arms to get up and sit down, therefore, he was given a test opportunity with the instruction not to lean on. The patient is informed that the test consists of performing as many repetitions as possible of getting up and sitting down in a chair during a period of 60 seconds and that the time elapsed to the tenth repetition of getting up and sitting down will be timed at the same time. .
1 year
IPAQ
Time Frame: 1 year
To estimate the level of mobility of older people. It includes seven questions that ask how often, for how long, and with what intensity the individual performed both moderate and vigorous activities during the past week, questions about time spent walking, and time spent sitting.
1 year
FHSQ
Time Frame: 1 year
Specific to foot health, measuring quality of life based on foot pain, functional competence, footwear, and overall foot health. The first section consists of 13 questions measuring. The second section consists of 20 questions with Likert-type responses in 4 items. In the last section, the individual's sociodemographic information is collected. Regarding the interpretation of the results, given that the questionnaire does not provide a total score, the individual's responses must be entered into a computer application that will quantify a score from 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst state of health and 100 being the best.
1 year
Bood pressure
Time Frame: 1 year
systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurement
1 year
Sex
Time Frame: o week , basaline
Sex
o week , basaline
BMC
Time Frame: 1 year
Body mass index
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: CARMEN GARCÍA GOMARIZ, UNIVERSITAT DE VALÉNCIA DEPARTAMENTO D'INFERMERIA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Old Age; Debility

Clinical Trials on Exercise program

Subscribe