Different Dosing Strategies of Colistin in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections

July 2, 2025 updated by: Mona Mohammed El-Tamalawy, Mansoura University

Efficacy and Safety of Different Dosing Strategies of Colistin in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections in Critically Ill Patients

Nosocomial infections caused by multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens represent a major threat worldwide. The increasing trend of multi-drug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) poses a particularly acute challenge to health systems especially in critically ill patients.

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) have encountered an increasing emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. In Saudi Arabia mainly MDR-GNB such as Acinetobacter Baumannii, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Klebsiella Pnemoniae and Enterobacter are observed in ICUs.

Polymyxins are the last line therapy in the treatment of infection caused by these MDR-GNB. Colistin is the most widely used polymyxin antibiotic, it is administered as inactive prodrug colistimethate sodium (CMS) that is hydrolyzed to an active moiety of colistin base activity (CBA). It acts as cationic detergent and damages bacterial cytoplasmic membrane causing leaking of intracellular substances and then cell death.

During the first years of their use, polymyxin-associated neurotoxicity occurred in patients with an incidence as high as 27% following parenteral administration. However, other retrospective clinical trials have not exposed neurotoxicity to be a major concern. On the other hand, nephrotoxicity is by far the most common and dose-limiting side effect associated with parenteral polymyxins, with incidence rates in patients as high as 60%. Despite the high incidence of colistin induced nephrotoxicity, in 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) reclassified polymyxins as critically important for the management of MDR-GNB infection, renewing the interest in these antibiotics.

To the best of our knowledge no study compared the efficacy and safety of both dosing strategies in critically ill patients. Moreover, there is still a lack of evidence on the efficacy and safety of both dosing strategies in obese patients. Therefore, this study aims at comparing the efficacy and toxicity of both strategies in colistin dosing (the fixed dose and the weight-based dosing) in obese patients and non- obese patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
        • Recruiting
        • King Fahad Specialist hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients age ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients who will be treated with CMS for MR GNB infections.
  • Patients who are admitted to the ICUs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to colistin.
  • Pregnant and lactating women.
  • Patients who are treated with colistin for < 24 hours.
  • Patients with myasthenia gravis or concomitant anesthetics or neuromuscular blocking drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The EMA (fixed dose) colistin group
The EMA colistin group will receive I.V colistin using fixed dose strategy.
The EMA colistin group will receive I.V colistin based on creatinine clearance (mL/min) level , with fixed loading dose 9 MIU equivalent to 300 mg of colistin-based activity (CBA). The maintenance dose will be administered after 12 h following the loading dose over 1 h every 12h (twice daily).
Active Comparator: US FDA (weight-based dose) colistin group
The weight-based colistin group will receive I.V. colistin using weight based dosing strategy.
The weight-based colistin group will receive I.V. colistin based on the lower (ideal body weight or actual body weight) with a loading dose of (4) X (patient weight in kg). Loading dose might exceed 300 mg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical and microbiological success in eradication of infection reported as the number and percentage of patients with successful clinical improvement and microbiological clearance (Efficacy).
Time Frame: 14 days post colistin initiation.

having a white blood cell count (WBC) of less than 12,000 cells/mm3 or a ≥ 25% reduction in WBC, being afebrile for ≥ 48 h,.

• Microbiological clearance will be defined as eradication of the original causative organism from subsequent blood cultures by day 14 of therapy.

14 days post colistin initiation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nephrotoxicity (Safety)
Time Frame: 14 days
nephrotoxicity was defined as doubling of baseline serum creatinine level or drop-in baseline creatinine clearance rate by ≥50%.
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed E Shams, Professor, Mansoura University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 25, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-04-Q001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Ill Patients

Clinical Trials on EMA colistin dosing strategy

Subscribe