Mulligan vs Maitland With Home-Based Exercise for Non-Specific Neck Pain

April 11, 2025 updated by: Dimitrios Lytras, International Hellenic University

Comparison of Mulligan and Maitland Mobilization Techniques Combined With Home-Based Exercise for Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition with multiple contributing factors. The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the short-term effects of Mulligan in comparison to Maitland mobilization techniques in conjunction with a home-based therapeutic exercise program. 43 adults with non-specific neck pain will be randomly divided into three groups of 14,14 and 15 participants each. In the participants of the first group, a therapeutic protocol of Mulligan mobilizations in the cervical region will be applied and a protocol of exercises will be performed. To the participants of the second group, a therapeutic protocol od Maitland mobilizations in the cervical region will be applied and the same exercise program with the first group will be performed. The third group participants will perform only the same exercise protocol as the other groups. The first two groups will receive four mobilization treatments over two weeks. All three groups will perform the home-based exercise protocol daily for two weeks. Pain in the last 24 hours with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) in the cervical region with an algometer, functional ability with the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Range of Motion (ROM) with a digital goniometer, pain catastrophizing with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) will be evaluated before and after the intervention. For the statistical analysis of the results, a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be applied using SPSS program, while the statistical significance index will be set at p < .05.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition with multiple contributing factors. Various manual therapy approaches, such as Mulligan and Maitland mobilizations, are commonly applied to alleviate pain and enhance function.

Aim: The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate the short-term effects of Mulligan in comparison to Maitland mobilization techniques in conjunction with a home-based therapeutic exercise (TE) program.

Method: 43 participants with non-specific neck pain will be randomly assigned to three groups of 14, 14 and 15 participants each. In the participants of the first group, a therapeutic protocol of mulligan mobilizations will be applied to the cervical region. In addition, the participants will perform a home-based therapeutic exercise program. To the participants of the second group, a therapeutic protocol of maitland mobilizations will be applied to the cervical region and they will perform the same home-based exercise protocol with the first group. The third group participants will perform only the same home-based exercise protocol with the other groups. The first two groups will receive four mobilization treatments over two weeks. All three groups will perform the home-based exercise protocol daily for two weeks. Pain in the last 24 hours with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) in the cervical region with an algometer, functional ability with the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Range of Motion (ROM) with a digital goniometer, pain catastrophizing with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) will be evaluated before and after the intervention. For the statistical analysis of the results, a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be applied using SPSS program, while the statistical significance index will be set at p < .05. Expected results: The protocol proposed in this clinical study combines the benefits of applying manual therapy mobilizations with the beneficial effects of therapeutic exercise. Previous research shows Mulligan mobilizations may be slightly more beneficial in improving patients' symptoms with non-specific neck pain. For this reason, we expect that the combination of Mulligan mobilizations and home-based therapeutic exercise will be more effective than the combination of Maitland mobilizations and home-based therapeutic exercise only in improving the clinical symptoms of young adults with non-specific neck pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 57400
        • International Hellenic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute-subacute-chronic neck pain
  • Women - Men
  • Age range between 18 and 30 years
  • NPRS score >2
  • Written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Previous cervical/thoracic surgery

    • Recent whiplash (≤6 months)
    • Upper cervical pathology
    • Osteoporosis
    • Pregnancy
    • Cancer
    • Systemic diseases or spinal disorders
    • Neurological symptoms
    • Severe medical conditions, positive red flags (Spurling test, Hoffmann's sign, Babinski reflex, clonus)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mulligan+TE
Participants allocated to this group will receive four sessions of Mulligan mobilizations and will perform a home-based therapeutic exercise program for two weeks.

Mulligan Mobilizations plus Home Therapeutic Exercise

The protocol will last 25 minutes (Mulligan protocol: 5 minutes and Home Therapeutic Exercise protocol: 20 minutes) and will include the application of the following mulligan techniques and home exercises:

  • Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glide SNAG mobilizations with overpressure with the patients in seated position.
  • 4 home-based therapeutic exercises: isometric exercises for cervical regions, head retractions, thoracic spine rotation mobility exercise and diagonal cervical mobility exercise pattern.
Experimental: Maitland +TE
Participants allocated to this group will receive four sessions of Maitland mobilizations and will perform a home-based therapeutic exercise program for two weeks.

The participants of this group will perform the same 4 home-based therapeutic exercises as the first group. In addition, they will receive a 5-minute maitland mobilization protocol.

Maitland mobilizations will include posterioranterior glides with oscillations with the patients in prone position.

Active Comparator: Active Comparator: "TE group".
Participants in this group will only perform the same 4 home-based therapeutic exercises as the first group.
Participants in this group will only perform the same 4 home-based therapeutic exercises as the first group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) with pressure algometry
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 2
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimal amount of pressure that produces pain. PPT will be assessed by a digital algometer and will be evaluated bilaterally in the upper trapezius muscle, between C7 and the acromion. The rubber tip of the algometer will be placed vertically on the site and the examiner will apply gradually increasing pressure in a rate of 1Kg/s.
pre-treatment, week: 2
Changes in cervical range of motion with digital goniometry
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 2
The cervical ROM of cervical flexion, extension, side bends and rotations will be assessed using a digital goniometer with the patient in the seated position. Each movement will be carried out once within the maximum pain-free range and will be documented by an independent physiotherapist
pre-treatment, week: 2
Changes in neck pain intensity with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 2
This tool is an 11-point scale from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain"). Consequently, a higher value indicates more intense pain. The participant selects a number that best represents their pain intensity. The NPRS is a well-validated tool commonly used to measure pain intensity in clinical practice and research.
pre-treatment, week: 2
Changes in functional ability with Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 2]
The Neck Disability Index (NDI), validated for the Greek population, will be used to assess disability. It comprises 10 sections that evaluate pain intensity, functional restrictions, and daily activities, with a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 50 (severe disability).
pre-treatment, week: 2]
Changes in pain catastrophizing with Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 2]
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used to assess pain catastrophizing. It is a 13-item questionnaire designed to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of catastrophizing across the subscales of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. The Greek version demonstrates high reliability (ICC = 0.85, Cronbach's α = 0.80).
pre-treatment, week: 2]
Changes in kinesiophobia with Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 2
Kinesiophobia will be evaluated using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), a 17-item questionnaire that assesses fear of movement and anxiety related to injury. Scores range from 17 to 68, with ≤37 indicating low kinesiophobia and >37 representing high kinesiophobia. The Greek version has demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.74, ICC = 0.78).
pre-treatment, week: 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EC-5/2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Mulligan+TE

Subscribe