Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in YOUNG Patients (START YOUNG)

May 7, 2026 updated by: Ceric Sàrl

Surgical Bioprosthesis Aortic Valve Replacement Vs. Myval Balloon-Expandable THV Series in Patients Aged 65 to 75 With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Judged Eligible by Heart Team

The study objective is to demonstrate that the clinical outcomes of the Myval balloon-expandable THV series are non-inferior to those of SAVR in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis aged 65 to 75 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, open label, trial of 1180 patients treated with surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60596
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • München, Germany, 80636
      • Trier, Germany, 54292
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Bruder Trier
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, University of Debrecen
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Szeged, Hungary
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Szeged
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Mercogliano, Italy, 83013
      • Milan, Italy, 20157
        • Not yet recruiting
        • IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Milan, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Gianluca Polvani
      • Parma, Italy, 43126
      • Roma, Italy, 00128
      • San Donato Milanese, Italy, 20097
      • Poznan, Poland, 61848
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Poznan University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Szczecin, Poland, 70111
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Szczecinie
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Piotr Pacholewicz, MD
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02097
      • Warsaw, Poland, 04628
        • Not yet recruiting
        • National Institute of Cardiology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Warsaw, Poland
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50981
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Military Hospital in Wroclaw
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Wroclaw, Poland
      • Carnaxide, Portugal
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de Santa Cruz, ULSLO
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Bucharest Clinical Emergency Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Central military emergency university hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Iași, Romania
        • Not yet recruiting
        • IBCV Iasi
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University Clinical Center of Serbia
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Kamenitz, Serbia
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid
        • Contact:
    • Principality of Asturias
      • Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain, 33011
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacobo Silva, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pablo Avanzas, MD
      • Belfast, United Kingdom
      • Brighton, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Sussex NHS foundation Trust
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Royal Papworth Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • John Taghavi, MD
      • Cottingham, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Coventry, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • London, United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Sheffield Teaching Hopitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Swansea, United Kingdom

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participant will be included if all the following criteria are met:

  1. Patients aged ≥65 and ≤75
  2. Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient≥40mmHg, and or peak velocity>4m/sec).
  3. Patients with symptomatic heart disease due to severe native calcific aortic stenosis, as judged by a multidisciplinary heart team (including a cardiac surgeon), for whom SAVR or transfemoral TAVR is deemed feasible and approved by the local heart team.Signed informed consent for participation in the clinical investigation

Exclusion Criteria:

Participant will not be included if any one of the following conditions exists:

  1. Unable to understand and follow clinical investigation-related instructions or unable to comply with the clinical investigation protocol
  2. Life expectancy less than 1 year
  3. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel or any Device frame components.
  4. Under judicial protection, tutorship, or curatorship
  5. Participation in another trial before the primary endpoint

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TAVR: Myval balloon-expandable THV Series
Myval balloon-expandable THV Series will be used for valve replacement
Patients receive Myval balloon-expandable THV Series (TAVR)
Active Comparator: SAVR: Any surgical bioprosthetic valve commercially available at the clinical investigation site
Surgical bioprosthetic valve commercially available at the clinical investigation site will be used for valve replacement
Patients receive any surgical bioprosthetic valve commercially available at the clinical investigation site (SAVR)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary safety endpoint at 1 month (non-inferiority): Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, bleeding, AKI stage 2-4, rehospitalization for a procedure-related event or or reintervention for aortic valve dysfunction.
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, VARC-3 type 1 (only overt bleeding that requires a transfusion of 1 unit of whole blood/red blood cells (BARC 3a), type 2 and 3 bleeding, AKI stage 2-4, rehospitalization for a procedure-related event or reintervention for aortic valve dysfunction.
1 month post procedure
Primary efficacy endpoint at 1 year (non-inferiority): Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, or rehospitalization for valve related event
Time Frame: 1 year post procedure
Composite measure of all-cause death, any stroke, or rehospitalization for valve related event at 1 year (VARC-3 definition)
1 year post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: primary endpoint : prevalence of feasible redoTAVR or ViV TAVR without requiring leaflet modifications techniques (green cases).
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
Proportion of participants classified as "green cases" (redo-TAVR or ViV-TAVR feasible without leaflet modification) based on predefined CT scan criteria, including annular dimensions, coronary access, and valve frame interactions.
1 month post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Endpoint: Feasibility of re-TAVR based on CT scan evaluation (CT scan, for selected sites only)
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure

Number of participants in whom redo-TAVR is deemed feasible based on CT scan evaluation.

Feasibility will be assessed using predefined anatomical criteria, including:

Annular dimensions Coronary access Valve frame interactions Need for leaflet modification techniques Feasibility will be categorized as: "Feasible without modification," "Feasible with modification," or "Not feasible.

1 month post procedure
Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants Requiring New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI) Due to Conduction System Disturbances
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure

Number of participants who require a new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) within 1 month post-procedure due to conduction system disturbances (e.g., high-degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block).

Indications for PPI will be based on standard clinical guidelines.

1 month post procedure
Secondary Endpoint: Rate of prosthetic valve regurgitation (moderate or severe)
Time Frame: 1 year post procedure
1 year post procedure
Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants with Major Vascular Complications (VARC-3 Criteria)
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure

Number of participants experiencing major vascular complications within 1 month post-procedure, as defined by VARC-3 criteria.

o Scoring System: Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria o Definition: MAJOR vacular complication: One of the following:

• Aortic dissection or aortic rupture • Vascular injury or compartment syndrome resulting in death,VARC type ≥2 bleeding, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible neurologic impairment • Distal embolization (non-cerebral) from a vascular source resulting in death, amputation, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible end-organ damage • Unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention resulting in death, VARC type ≥2 bleeding, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible neurologic impairment • Closure device failure resulting in death, VARC type ≥2 bleeding, limb or visceral ischaemia, or irreversible neurologic impairment

1 month post procedure
Secondary Endpoint: Performance of the aortic valve : Gradients (mean/max) assessed by TTE
Time Frame: 1 year and 3 years post procedure

Mean and peak aortic valve gradients (mmHg) will be measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at each follow-up time point.

Values will be reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

1 year and 3 years post procedure
Secondary Endpoint: Performance of the aortic valve : paravalvular leakage (PVL) grade evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
Time Frame: 1 year and 3 years post procedure

Number of participants stratified by paravalvular leakage (PVL) grade (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe), as assessed by TTE.

PVL severity will be determined based on echocardiographic parameters defined by the VARC-3 criteria.

1 year and 3 years post procedure
Secondary Endpoint: Performance of the aortic valve : effective orifice are (EOA) evaluated by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
Time Frame: 1 year and 3 years post procedure

Effective orifice area (EOA) (cm²) measured using the continuity equation on TTE.

Values will be reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

1 year and 3 years post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes : feasibility of redoTAVR or ViV TAVR with or without requiring leaflet modification techniques
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
Proportion of participants in whom redo-TAVR or ViV-TAVR is feasible, with or without requiring leaflet modification techniques, based on CT scan evaluation. Classification will be based on predefined anatomic and hemodynamic feasibility criteria.
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: prevalence of HALT in both TAVR and SAVR groups
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
Number of participants with HALT detected on CT scan in both TAVR and SAVR groups. HALT will be defined as the presence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening observed on post-procedure CT imaging.
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Impact of HALT on Mean Transvalvular Gradient - Valve Hemodynamics
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
  • Outcome Measure: Mean change in mean transvalvular gradient (mmHg) in participants with and without HALT, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
  • Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
  • Unit of Measure: mmHg
  • Interpretation: A higher mean transvalvular gradient suggests increased valve obstruction.
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Impact of HALT on Peak Transvalvular Gradient - Valve Hemodynamics
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
  • Outcome Measure: Mean change in peak transvalvular gradient (mmHg) in participants with and without HALT, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
  • Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
  • Unit of Measure: mmHg
  • Interpretation: A higher peak transvalvular gradient indicates greater hemodynamic burden on the valve.
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Impact of HALT on Effective Orifice Area (EOA) - Valve Hemodynamics
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
  • Outcome Measure: Mean change in effective orifice area (cm²) in participants with and without HALT, measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
  • Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
  • Unit of Measure: cm²
  • Interpretation: A lower EOA suggests impaired valve opening and increased risk of stenosis.
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Mean Transvalvular Gradient - THV Hemodynamics
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
  • Outcome Measure: Mean transvalvular gradient (mmHg) measured by TTE post-implantation.
  • Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
  • Unit of Measure: mmHg
  • Interpretation: Higher gradients indicate increased obstruction.
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Peak Transvalvular Gradient - THV Hemodynamics
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
  • Outcome Measure: Peak transvalvular gradient (mmHg) measured by TTE post-implantation.
  • Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
  • Unit of Measure: mmHg
  • Interpretation: Higher peaks indicate more severe stenosis.
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Effective Orifice Area (EOA) - THV Hemodynamics
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
  • Outcome Measure: Effective orifice area (cm²) measured by TTE post-implantation.
  • Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
  • Unit of Measure: cm²
1 month post procedure
CT Scan Sub Study endpoints: Secondary outcomes: Commissural Alignment of THV
Time Frame: 1 month post procedure
Mean commissural misalignment angle (degrees) measured by CT scan to evaluate THV positioning relative to native aortic valve commissures.
1 month post procedure
Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: all cause mortality over time
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Number of participants who experience all-cause mortality at each follow-up time point.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Stroke Over Time
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Number of participants with any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) as defined by clinical assessment and imaging confirmation.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Bleeding Events (VARC-3 Type 1, 2, and 3) Over Time
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

Number of participants experiencing bleeding events classified as VARC-3 type 1 (BARC 3a), type 2 and 3.

  • Scoring System: Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) scale:
  • 1

    • Overt bleeding not requiringing surgical or percutaneous intervention, but requiring medical intervention, leading to hospitalization, an increased level of care, or medical evaluation
    • Overt bleeding requiring a transfusion of 1 unit of whole blood/RBC
  • 3

    • Overt bleeding in a critical organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial or intramuscular with compartment syndrome
    • Overt bleeding causing hypovolemic shock or severe hypotension
    • Overt bleeding requiring reoperation, surgical exploration, or re-intervention for the purpose of controlling bleeding
    • Post-thoracotomy chest tube output ≥2 L within 24-h
    • Overt bleeding requiring a transfusion of ≥5 units of whole blood/RBC
    • Overt bleeding associated with a haemoglobin drop ≥5 g/dL
  • Higher scores indicate worst outcomes
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Stage 2-4 Over Time
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years

Number of participants with acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 2-4 based on VARC-3

  • Scale Information: AKI from Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3):

    • Scoring System:
    • Stage 1: AKI that fulfils at least one of the following criteria:
  • Increase in serum creatinine ≥150-200% (≥1.5-2.0x increase) within 7 days compared with baseline
  • Increase of ≥ 0.3mg/dL (≥26.4 μmol/L) within 48 h of the index procedure

    o Stage 2: AKI that fulfils the following criterion:

  • Increase in serum creatinine >200-300% (>2.0-3.0x increase) within 7 days compared with baseline

    o Stage 3: AKI that fulfils at least one of the following criteria:

  • Increase in serum creatinine >300% (>3.0x increase) within 7 days compared with baseline
  • Serum creatinine ≥4.0 mg/dL (≥354 μmol/L) with an acute increase of ≥0.5 mg/dL (≥44 μmol/L)

    • Stage 4: AKI requiring new temporary or permanent renal replacement therapy
    • Interpretation: Higher stages indicate more severe kidney injury
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Rehospitalization for Procedure-Related Event Over Time
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Number of participants requiring rehospitalization due to procedure-related complications.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Secondary Endpoint: Individual components of the primary endpoints: Reintervention for Aortic Valve Dysfunction Over Time
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Number of participants requiring reintervention (redo-TAVR, SAVR, or valve explantation) due to aortic valve dysfunction.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 years
Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants with Structural Valve Deterioration (VARC-3) and/or Requiring Redo-TAVR or Valve Explantation
Time Frame: 5 years and 10 years post procedure

Number of participants experiencing significant structural valve deterioration (SVD) as defined by VARC-3 criteria.

SVD will be assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) Number of participants requiring redo-TAVR or surgical valve explantation within 5 years and 10 years post-procedure.

5 years and 10 years post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe Garot, European Cardiovascular Research Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2037

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Myval balloon-expandable THV Series

Subscribe