Comparison of Self- and Balloon-expandable Valves in Patients With Ascending Aortic Dilation Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

This study aimed at comparing the performance of self-expandable valves versus balloon-expandable valves in patients with ascending aortic dilation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Ascending aortic (AA) dilation is a common feature in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), especially in those with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). For patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), current guidelines recommend concomitant aortic repair or replacement if the diameter of AA exceeds 45mm to avoid aortic dissection or rupture.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has profoundly changed the clinical management of AS patients who cannot tolerate SAVR. For patients who are candidates for TAVR, simultaneous repair of a dilated AA can be technically difficult. The safety and feasibility of the procedure and the fate of AA after the procedure in these patients remain unclear. Moreover, there are limited data comparing the performance of self-expandable valves versus balloon-expandable valves in these patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of type of transcatheter heart valves on intra-procedural device success and post-procedural AA progression in patients with dilated AA (≥45mm) undergoing TAVR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe aortic stenosis;
  • Transfemoral access;
  • Preoperative aortic CT suggesting maximum ascending aortic diameter ≥45mm and <55mm;
  • Anticipated life expectancy >1 year;
  • Age ≥ 65 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dominant aortic regurgitation,;
  • A history of SAVR or TAVR;
  • A history of aortic surgery;
  • Emergent TAVR.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Self-expandable valve group
Patients using self-expandable valves
patients undergoing TAVR use either self-expandable valves or balloon-expandable valves
Experimental: Balloon-expandable valve group
Patients using balloon-expandable valves
patients undergoing TAVR use either self-expandable valves or balloon-expandable valves

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after TAVR procedure
all-cause mortality within 30 days after TAVR procedure
30 days after TAVR procedure
30-day adverse aortic events
Time Frame: 30 days after TAVR procedure
aortic death, aortic dissection, or aortic rupture
30 days after TAVR procedure
The rate of device success
Time Frame: 30 days

Device success is defined as following:

  1. Technical success (Freedom from mortality; Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system; Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location; Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication)
  2. Freedom from mortality
  3. Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication
  4. Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient <20 mmHg, peak velocity <3 m/s, Doppler velocity index $0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation)
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-year all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 1 year after TAVR procedure
all-cause mortality
1 year after TAVR procedure
1-year cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 1 year after TAVR procedure
Related to heart failure, cardiogenic shock, bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolism, bleeding, tamponade, vascular complication, arrhythmia or conduction system disturbances, cardiovascular infection (e.g. mediastinitis, endocarditis), or other clear cardiovascular cause
1 year after TAVR procedure
1-year adverse aortic events
Time Frame: 1 year after TAVR procedure
aortic death, aortic dissection, or aortic rupture
1 year after TAVR procedure
Ascending aortic diameter expansion rate ≥3mm/year
Time Frame: 1 year after TAVR procedure
Expansion rate was calculated as the change of ascending aortic diameters (before the procedure and at the latest follow-up) divided by the follow-up period.
1 year after TAVR procedure
Hospitalization (or re-hospitalization)
Time Frame: 1 year after TAVR procedure

Any admission after the index hospitalization or study enrolment to an inpatient unit or hospital ward for ≥24 h, including an emergency department stay.

Hospitalizations planned for pre-existing conditions are excluded unless there is worsening of the baseline condition. Visits to urgent care centres or emergency departments <24 h may also be included if substantive intensification of therapy changes (e.g. heart failure episodes) are enacted (e.g. intravenous diuretics, significant increases in drug therapy dosages or addition of new pharmacotherapy agents)

1 year after TAVR procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiangbin Pan, MD, Department of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 11, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 11, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on type of transcatheter heart valves

3
Subscribe