Ankle Fracture Tourniquet Utilization

February 12, 2026 updated by: Alex Demers

Does Tourniquet Utilization Negatively Impact Patient Pain and Outcomes Following Operative Fixation of Rotational Ankle Fractures? A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lower extremity tourniquet utilization remains a controversial practice during the operative fixation of rotational ankle fractures and is often left to surgeon discretion. At our own institution, tourniquet use varies between surgeons with some providers using a tourniquet for every case, while others regularly do not utilize tourniquets. Despite benefits of decreased surgical time and decreased blood loss, many studies have cited negative outcomes associated with tourniquet usage including increased postoperative swelling and pain, increased wound complications, and increased risks of deep vein thrombosis. These outcomes have been limited to retrospective reviews and meta-analyses with few randomized control trials specifically evaluating these outcomes in ankle fracture patients. To better assess the impact of tourniquet use on ankle fracture postoperative outcomes, this randomized control trial seeks to 1) compare differences in postoperative visual analog scale pain scores for patients undergoing operative fixation of rotation ankle fractures with and without a tourniquet, while 2) evaluating rates of wound, thrombotic, and surgical complications associated with tourniquet use. Patients will be randomized by an Excel random number generator to a tourniquet and non-tourniquet group. Patients will remain blinded to randomization. The treating orthopaedic trauma surgeon will be notified by the PI of the study informing them of the randomization status to ensure appropriate tourniquet utilization the day of surgery. Patients will then undergo standard operative fixation and postoperative management as clinically indicated by the orthopaedic trauma team. Patients will follow-up at 2 weeks and subsequently every 4 weeks as is protocol at our institution. Patient charts will be reviewed for patient and perioperative factors, as well as postoperative complications (i.e. wound complications, need for repeat surgical intervention, and deep vein thrombosis).

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

Lower extremity tourniquet utilization remains a controversial practice during the operative fixation of rotational ankle fractures and is often left to surgeon discretion. At our own institution, tourniquet use varies between surgeons with some providers using a tourniquet for every case, while others regularly do not utilize tourniquets. Despite benefits of decreased surgical time and decreased blood loss, many studies have cited negative outcomes associated with tourniquet usage including increased postoperative swelling and pain, increased wound complications, and increased risks of deep vein thrombosis. These outcomes have been limited to retrospective reviews and meta-analyses with few randomized control trials specifically evaluating these outcomes in ankle fracture patients. To better assess the impact of tourniquet use on ankle fracture postoperative outcomes, this randomized control trial seeks to 1) compare differences in postoperative visual analog scale pain scores for patients undergoing operative fixation of rotation ankle fractures with and without a tourniquet, while 2) evaluating rates of wound, thrombotic, and surgical complications associated with tourniquet use. II.

Tourniquet utilization in the operative fixation of ankle fractures remains controversial and is often subject to surgeon preferences. Despite postulated benefits of minimizing blood loss, decreasing operative times, and improving visualization, tourniquets in ankle fracture fixation have been associated with increased postoperative pain, swelling, decreased range of motion, and increased opioid consumption. Previous literature has demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in wound infections and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with tourniquet usage. Changes in perfusion intraoperatively and effects of ischemic reperfusion injury have been theorized as drivers of these negative side effects of tourniquets. Perfusion following ankle fracture fixation, thus represents an opportunity to better understand the physiologic implications of tourniquet utilization.

Tourniquet use is associated with negative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite decreased blood loss, tourniquet use in TKA has been associated with higher VAS pain scores, decreased knee range of motion and functional scores in the early postoperative period, higher rates of thrombotic events, infection, and reoperation. Impaired prosthesis survival, knee function, blood transfusion rates, quality of life, and patient satisfaction bring into question the utility of tourniquet use in TKA. These outcomes have not been thoroughly investigated in the fixation of ankle fractures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52245
        • University of Iowa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients >18 y.o. undergoing ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation
  2. Ground level fall as mechanism of injury
  3. Closed injury

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Open Ankle Fractures
  2. Vascular Injury Requiring Intervention
  3. Lower extremity injuries on same side of ankle fracture

e) Active anticoagulation/bleeding disorder necessitating tourniquet use (Hemoglobin <7, PT >13, PTT>35) f) Ipsilateral lower extremity trauma impacting immobilization g) Patients with peripheral neuropathy h) Patients undergoing ankle arthroscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tourniquet Group
Patients randomized to this group will have a tourniquet used during the operative fixation of their ankle fracture. Tourniquets will be inflated to 250 mmHg as is standard for our institution. Tourniquet will be deflated at time of closure.
Tourniquets will be applied to the thigh of the operative extremity during operative fixation of ankle fractures.
Other: No Tourniquet Group
Patients randomized to this group will not have a tourniquet used during operative fixation of their ankle fracture. A tourniquet will be placed on the patient's operative extremity as a safety precaution, but will remain deflated for the duration of the procedure unless emergently needed for hemostasis.
No tourniquet will be inflated on the operative extremity during the operative fixation of ankle fractures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cat V1.1 Pain Interference scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Cat V1.1 Pain Interference (10-90, lower is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.
6 weeks, 3 months
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cat V2.0 Physical Function Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 month
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Cat V2.0 Physical Function (10-90, higher is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.
6 weeks, 3 month
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale V1.2 Global Health Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Scale V1.2 Global Health (15-70, higher is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.
6 weeks, 3 months
Visual Analog Scale Pain Levels
Time Frame: Post anesthesia recovery unit, 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks, 3 month follow-up
VAS pain scores (0-10) will be assessed for the ankle immediately postoperatively in the post anesthesia care unit and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.
Post anesthesia recovery unit, 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks, 3 month follow-up
Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) Yellow Flag 17-Item
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
OSPRO-Yf 17 questionnaires will be completed at follow-up appointments as part of standard trauma clinic workflow and will be assessed at 6 weeks, and 3 months.
6 weeks, 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: 6 months
Postoperative complications following operative fixation of ankle fractures will be assessed at follow-up appointments and through chart review. Complications include postoperative deep vein thrombosis, wound complications and infection (patients receiving antibiotics or requiring surgical irrigation and debridement), need for revision fixation or hardware removal.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alex Demers, MD, University of Iowa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared secondary to data sharing regulations at our institution.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fracture

Clinical Trials on Tourniquet

Subscribe