- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06863688
Ankle Fracture Tourniquet Utilization
Does Tourniquet Utilization Negatively Impact Patient Pain and Outcomes Following Operative Fixation of Rotational Ankle Fractures? A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Lower extremity tourniquet utilization remains a controversial practice during the operative fixation of rotational ankle fractures and is often left to surgeon discretion. At our own institution, tourniquet use varies between surgeons with some providers using a tourniquet for every case, while others regularly do not utilize tourniquets. Despite benefits of decreased surgical time and decreased blood loss, many studies have cited negative outcomes associated with tourniquet usage including increased postoperative swelling and pain, increased wound complications, and increased risks of deep vein thrombosis. These outcomes have been limited to retrospective reviews and meta-analyses with few randomized control trials specifically evaluating these outcomes in ankle fracture patients. To better assess the impact of tourniquet use on ankle fracture postoperative outcomes, this randomized control trial seeks to 1) compare differences in postoperative visual analog scale pain scores for patients undergoing operative fixation of rotation ankle fractures with and without a tourniquet, while 2) evaluating rates of wound, thrombotic, and surgical complications associated with tourniquet use. II.
Tourniquet utilization in the operative fixation of ankle fractures remains controversial and is often subject to surgeon preferences. Despite postulated benefits of minimizing blood loss, decreasing operative times, and improving visualization, tourniquets in ankle fracture fixation have been associated with increased postoperative pain, swelling, decreased range of motion, and increased opioid consumption. Previous literature has demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in wound infections and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with tourniquet usage. Changes in perfusion intraoperatively and effects of ischemic reperfusion injury have been theorized as drivers of these negative side effects of tourniquets. Perfusion following ankle fracture fixation, thus represents an opportunity to better understand the physiologic implications of tourniquet utilization.
Tourniquet use is associated with negative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite decreased blood loss, tourniquet use in TKA has been associated with higher VAS pain scores, decreased knee range of motion and functional scores in the early postoperative period, higher rates of thrombotic events, infection, and reoperation. Impaired prosthesis survival, knee function, blood transfusion rates, quality of life, and patient satisfaction bring into question the utility of tourniquet use in TKA. These outcomes have not been thoroughly investigated in the fixation of ankle fractures.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52245
- University of Iowa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients >18 y.o. undergoing ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation
- Ground level fall as mechanism of injury
- Closed injury
Exclusion criteria:
- Open Ankle Fractures
- Vascular Injury Requiring Intervention
- Lower extremity injuries on same side of ankle fracture
e) Active anticoagulation/bleeding disorder necessitating tourniquet use (Hemoglobin <7, PT >13, PTT>35) f) Ipsilateral lower extremity trauma impacting immobilization g) Patients with peripheral neuropathy h) Patients undergoing ankle arthroscopy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Tourniquet Group
Patients randomized to this group will have a tourniquet used during the operative fixation of their ankle fracture.
Tourniquets will be inflated to 250 mmHg as is standard for our institution.
Tourniquet will be deflated at time of closure.
|
Tourniquets will be applied to the thigh of the operative extremity during operative fixation of ankle fractures.
|
|
Other: No Tourniquet Group
Patients randomized to this group will not have a tourniquet used during operative fixation of their ankle fracture.
A tourniquet will be placed on the patient's operative extremity as a safety precaution, but will remain deflated for the duration of the procedure unless emergently needed for hemostasis.
|
No tourniquet will be inflated on the operative extremity during the operative fixation of ankle fractures.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cat V1.1 Pain Interference scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Cat V1.1 Pain Interference (10-90, lower is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.
|
6 weeks, 3 months
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cat V2.0 Physical Function Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 month
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Cat V2.0 Physical Function (10-90, higher is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.
|
6 weeks, 3 month
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale V1.2 Global Health Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores including PROMIS Scale V1.2 Global Health (15-70, higher is better) will be completed at 6 week and 3 month follow-up appointments as part of standard clinic workflow.
|
6 weeks, 3 months
|
|
Visual Analog Scale Pain Levels
Time Frame: Post anesthesia recovery unit, 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks, 3 month follow-up
|
VAS pain scores (0-10) will be assessed for the ankle immediately postoperatively in the post anesthesia care unit and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.
|
Post anesthesia recovery unit, 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks, 3 month follow-up
|
|
Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) Yellow Flag 17-Item
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
|
OSPRO-Yf 17 questionnaires will be completed at follow-up appointments as part of standard trauma clinic workflow and will be assessed at 6 weeks, and 3 months.
|
6 weeks, 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Postoperative complications following operative fixation of ankle fractures will be assessed at follow-up appointments and through chart review.
Complications include postoperative deep vein thrombosis, wound complications and infection (patients receiving antibiotics or requiring surgical irrigation and debridement), need for revision fixation or hardware removal.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alex Demers, MD, University of Iowa
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zhang W, Li N, Chen S, Tan Y, Al-Aidaros M, Chen L. The effects of a tourniquet used in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Mar 6;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-13.
- Benedick A, Rivera T, Vallier HA. Effect of Tourniquet Use During Ankle Fracture Fixation on Wound Healing and Infectious Complications. Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Jun;41(6):714-720. doi: 10.1177/1071100720907379. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
- Konrad G, Markmiller M, Lenich A, Mayr E, Ruter A. Tourniquets may increase postoperative swelling and pain after internal fixation of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Apr;(433):189-94. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000151849.37260.0a.
- Davey MS, Davey MG, Hurley ET, Kearns SR. Tourniquet Use During Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Sep-Oct;61(5):1103-1108. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
- Kruse H, Christensen KP, Moller AM, Gogenur I. Tourniquet use during ankle surgery leads to increased postoperative opioid use. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 May 12.
- Younger AS, Kalla TP, McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Survey of tourniquet use in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Mar;26(3):208-17. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600305.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202311372
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Fracture
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityRecruitingAnkle Fractures | Ankle Fracture - Lateral Malleolus | Syndesmotic Injuries | Ankle Fracture, Trimalleolar | Ankle Fracture, Bimalleolar | Fibula Fracture | Ankle Fracture - Medial Malleolus | Maisonneuve's FractureUnited States
-
Spital Limmattal SchlierenCompletedAnkle Fracture - Lateral Malleolus | Ankle Fracture, Trimalleolar | Ankle Fracture, BimalleolarSwitzerland
-
Ostfold Hospital TrustRecruitingAnkle Fracture, Trimalleolar | Ankle Fracture, BimalleolarNorway
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedAnkle Malleolus Fracture Bimalleolar | Fracture of Medial Malleolus | Fracture of AnkleNorway
-
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.University of UtahCompletedPilon Fracture | Calcaneus Fracture | Ankle Fracture | Talus FractureUnited States
-
University College CorkCork University HospitalCompletedAnkle Fracture - Lateral Malleolus | Rebound Pain | Ankle Fracture - Medial Malleolus | Ankle Fracture (bimalleolar Equivalent, Bimalleolar, or Trimalleolar)Ireland
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedFracture, Ankle | Fracture LegFrance
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationCompletedPilon Fracture | Ankle FractureUnited States, Brazil, Canada
-
University of UtahCompletedAnkle FractureUnited States
-
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustUnknown
Clinical Trials on Tourniquet
-
Hawler Medical UniversityCompletedUse of Tourniquet in Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
Hôpital NOVOCompleted
-
Hvidovre University HospitalWithdrawn
-
Per AspenbergCompleted
-
Marcus MiguraMercy HealthCompletedHemorrhage | Vascular InjuryUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineZimmer BiometCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedHypospadias | Tourniquet | Hypospadias, Coronal | Hypospadia, RepairEgypt
-
Ataturk UniversityErzurum Nenehatun Kadın Doğum HastanesiCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedHealthy SubjectUnited States