Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Quality of Life in Children With Chronic Lung Diseases: A Multidisciplinary Approach

March 5, 2025 updated by: Mohamed Salah El-Sayed, Horus University

The Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Respiratory Function and Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients With Chronic Lung Diseases: A Multidisciplinary Approach in Damietta Governorate

Chronic lung diseases (CLDs) such as asthma, cystic fibrosis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia significantly impact pediatric patients' respiratory function and overall well-being. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to improve lung function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in affected individuals. However, limited research has been conducted on PR implementation in Egypt.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhances respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in pediatric patients with CLDs while reducing healthcare utilization. These findings highlight the necessity of integrating structured PR programs into pediatric respiratory care in Egypt.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Damietta, Egypt
        • out-patient clinic, faculty of physical therapy, Horus university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed cases of CLDs, stable clinical condition, and ability to participate in rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe comorbidities, recent respiratory infections, or contraindications to physical activity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: standard medical care group
Patients receiving standard medical care without structured pulmonary rehabilitation.
standard medical care
Other: structured pulmonary rehabilitation
The experimental group underwent a 12-week structured pulmonary rehabilitation program.

structured pulmonary rehabilitation program including:

  • Physical Therapy: Breathing exercises, airway clearance techniques, inspiratory muscle training.
  • Pediatrics & Chest Medicine: Medical supervision, optimization of pharmacological treatment.
  • Physiology: Monitoring pulmonary function and physiological responses to exercise.
  • Public Health: Evaluating program feasibility and its impact on healthcare utilization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second
Time Frame: at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

FEV₁ is the volume of air that a person can forcefully exhale in the first second of a forced breath after taking a deep inhalation.

Interpretation of FEV₁:

≥80% of predicted → Normal 60-79% of predicted → Mild obstruction 40-59% of predicted → Moderate obstruction <40% of predicted → Severe obstruction

at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention
Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

FVC is the total volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled after taking the deepest possible breath.

Normal Values: Typically ≥80% of the predicted value. Obstructive Lung Disease: FVC may be normal or slightly reduced. Restrictive Lung Disease: FVC is significantly reduced due to decreased lung compliance or lung volume.

at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
Time Frame: at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

PEFR is the maximum speed of expiration achieved after full lung inflation. It is measured in liters per minute (L/min).

ormal values depend on age, sex, and height: Adult males: 450-700 L/min Adult females: 300-500 L/min Reduced PEFR: Suggests airway obstruction, such as in asthma or COPD.

at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalization Frequency
Time Frame: at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

Hospitalization frequency refers to the number of times a patient is admitted to a hospital due to disease exacerbation, complications, or treatment failure.

Number of hospital admissions within a specific time frame (e.g., per year). Length of hospital stay (days per admission). Emergency department visits requiring inpatient care.

at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention
Medication Dependency
Time Frame: at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

Medication dependency refers to the extent to which a patient relies on pharmacological treatment to manage symptoms and maintain functional health.

Frequency and dosage of medication use. Number of rescue medication uses (e.g., bronchodilators in asthma). Reduction or discontinuation of medication over time.

at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention
Parental Satisfaction with Treatment
Time Frame: at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

Parental satisfaction refers to how parents perceive the effectiveness, convenience, and overall impact of their child's treatment plan.

Standardized satisfaction surveys (e.g., Likert scale questionnaires). Interviews or focus groups with parents. Feedback on treatment effectiveness, side effects, accessibility, and ease of use.

at basline and after 12-weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed El-Sayed, Horus University in Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PostDoc_012025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on standard medical care

Subscribe