Evaluation of the Visual Motor Task's Impact on the Behavior of a Neuronal and Spinal Network in Hemiplegic Patients

The general objective being to determine the modifications nature induced by upper extremity kinematic rhythmic task realization on cervical HSCC.

The obtained knowledge could open up new prospects for rehabilitation in cerebro-injured subjects in addition to existing therapeutics.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Half of all stroke patients have physical disabilities. These disabilities combine sensory and motor deficiencies (control deficit, syncinesia, tone disorders) that cause disruption of upper extremity (UE) function (orientation, UE length adjustment and grip). The human spinal cord circuitry (HSCC) participate in the motion regulation. Roche et al. studied in healthy subjects the HSCC modifications during the visuo-motor regulation of the object clamping force by the hand. The authors showed that the learning of the task in a single session was associated with HSCC modifications, specific or not depending on the HSCC and according to a visual biofeedback associated or not to the task. Diserens et al. showed also that a rhythmic movement of UE pedaling causes a decrease in spasticity in hemiplegic subjects. Moreover, HSCC modification is dependent on the task performed. The rhythmic ball-bouncing in a virtual environment is a visuo-motor task rhythmic kinematic already studied in the healthy subject. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate HSCC modification in hemiplegic subjects performing a rhythmic kinematic task with UE. We hypothesize that such a task leads to HSCC excitability specific modifications in the cervical spinal cord and leads to an improvement in the motor capabilities of the subjects.

The general objective being to determine the modifications nature induced by UE kinematic rhythmic task realization on cervical HSCC, our research will be broken down into four studies.

Study 1 will identify the influence of visual feedback on changes in HSCC excitability in a voluntary group. In this first study, 16 voluntary subjects will perform the visuo-motor task with their dominant UE and the control task (without visual feedback) with their dominant UE.

Study 2 will investigate the impact of UE laterality which performing the task on changes in HSCC excitability in a voluntary group. In this second study, 16 volunteer subjects will perform the visuo-motor task with their dominant UE and the visuo-motor task with their non-dominant UE.

Study 3 will objectify the effect of the type of contraction of the muscles involved in the task on changes in HSCC excitability in a volunteer group. In this third study, 16 voluntary subjects will perform the visuo-motor task with their dominant UE by performing either elbow flexion-extension or only flexion-extension of the wrist.

Finally, study 4 will study the effect of the pathology and the motor strategies used on the changes in HSCC excitability. In the latter study, 16 hemiplegic patients will perform the visuo-motor task with their paretic UE and spontaneous motor strategies.

The obtained knowledge could open up new prospects for rehabilitation in cerebro-injured subjects in addition to existing therapeutics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Recruiting
        • Nicolas ROCHE, Md PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Hemiplegic subjects:

  • Informed consent signature,
  • Male or female aged 18 years or over,
  • Hemiplegic patient with single stroke,
  • Patient able to stand without technical assistance,
  • Patient capable of performing an active elbow flexion/extension movement of an amplitude of at least 45° against gravity,
  • Patient able to understand and realize the cyclical kinematic rhythmic task.
  • Absence of cognitive impairment, Mini-Mental State score (MMS) equal to 30.

Voluntary subjects:

  • Informed consent signature,
  • Male or female aged 18 years or over,

Exclusion Criteria:

Hemiplegic subjects:

  • Refusal to participate in the study,
  • Inability to cooperate,
  • Intervention on the studied upper limb dating less than 6 months,
  • No affiliation to a social security scheme,
  • No H-reflex in the muscle Flexor Carpi Radialis,
  • Epilepsy antecedent.in the year prior to inclusion.

Voluntary subjects:

  • Refusal to participate in the study,
  • Inability to cooperate,
  • Intervention on the studied upper limb dating less than 6 months,
  • No affiliation to a social security scheme,
  • No H-reflex in the Flexor Carpi Radialis muscle,
  • Ambidextrous subject,
  • Epilepsy antecedent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: visual motor tasks with dominant arm (1)
experimental arm for the first sub-study healthy volunteer
No Intervention: control tasks with dominant arm
control arm for the first sub-study healthy volunteer
No Intervention: visual motor tasks with non-dominant arm
control arm for the second sub-study healthy volunteer
No Intervention: visual motor tasks on dominant arm, flexion movement
experimental arm for the third sub-study healthy volunteer
No Intervention: visual motor tasks on dominant arm, extension movement
experimental arm for the third sub-study healthy volunteer
Experimental: visual motor tasks
fourth sub-study with hemiplegic patient
This exercise involves manipulating an object that corresponds to a "racket", this racket has a virtual avatar that animated a virtual ball. The purpose is to make it bounce to a given height. This comes close to ping-pong game.
No Intervention: visual motor tasks with dominant arm (2)
experimental arm for the second sub-study healthy volunteer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hoffmann's reflex amplitude
Time Frame: 2h
amplitude modification of the hoffmann's reflex
2h

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bell's test
Time Frame: 15 min
The Bells Test is a cancellation test that allows for a quantitative and qualitative assessment of visual neglect
15 min
kinematic performance of the rhythmic task
Time Frame: 20 min
task performance, learning task
20 min
modified Ashworth scale
Time Frame: 15 min
spasticity evaluation
15 min
fugl meyer test
Time Frame: 40 min
is an index to assess the sensorimotor impairment in individuals who have had stroke
40 min
MRC testing
Time Frame: 30 min
muscle strengh mesurement
30 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-A01190-51

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Spinal Cord Circuitry

Clinical Trials on visual motor tasks

3
Subscribe