Pocus Triage in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Abdominal Pain

March 18, 2025 updated by: Necip Gökhan Güner, Sakarya University

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Focused Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Triage and Classical Triage in Patients Applying to the Emergency Department with Abdominal Pain

Introduction and Objective: This study aimed to reveal the effect of classical triage and Bedside Focused Ultrasonography (POCUS) in addition to classical triage on diagnosis, treatment, emergency department follow-up and its relationship with triage models in patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain complaints.

METHOD: This randomized, controlled, prospective study was conducted with a total of 262 volunteer participants who were divided into two groups as 127 classical triage and 135 POCUS in addition to classical triage with non-traumatic abdominal pain. The decision of which participant would be included in which group was made at a 1:1 ratio using a computer-aided randomization table. The researcher did not intervene in the clinical processes in any way. In this study, the effect of POCUS application performed in addition to classical triage on clinical processes (imaging request, initial analgesia administration time, consultation request, emergency department stay and outcome) in the primary outcome and on triage systems in the secondary outcome were evaluated. IBM SPSS 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

262

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Adapazarı
      • Sakarya, Adapazarı, Turkey, 54100
        • Sakarya Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Present to the emergency room with abdominal pain
  • No history of trauma in the last 48 hours
  • Stable hemodynamics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • According to the 3-way triage, the color code is red
  • Being under the age of 18
  • Being pregnant
  • Having a history of trauma within the last 48 hours
  • Being morbidly obese
  • Having mental retardation
  • Having repeated emergency room visits
  • Being referred from the polyclinic to the emergency room with a diagnosis
  • Filling the study form incompletely

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: POCUS Triage
Patients are directed to the area where they will be examined in accordance with the triage category determined by abdominal POCUS, which is performed in addition to classical triage.
In this study, POCUS was performed by the same emergency medicine physician who had basic and advanced USG training and at least two years of POCUS experience, in accordance with ACEP imaging protocols. A portable USG device with B-Mode, M-Mode, Color Doppler, Power Doppler, Pulsed Wave Doppler modes, and which can be used in all clinical modes with a single probe was used during the protocol application (Butterfly iQ+™, Burlington, United States). Eight abdominal points (epigastric region, right upper quadrant, right side, right lower quadrant, suprapubic region, left lower quadrant, left side and upper quadrant, umbilical region) were scanned with POCUS, the findings were recorded on the previously prepared form, the triage categories of the patients (cl) were updated and the patients were directed to the area where they would be examined with the form.
No Intervention: Classical Triage
Patients are directed to the area where they will be examined in accordance with the triage category determined by classical triage application.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to initial analgesia
Time Frame: 6 months
To evaluate the effect of adding the POCUS application to conventional triage on clinical processes, including imaging requests, time to initial analgesia.
6 months
Request for additional medical imaging
Time Frame: 6 months
To evaluate the effect of adding the POCUS application to conventional triage on imaging requests.
6 months
Emergency department length of stay
Time Frame: 6 months
To evaluate the effect of adding POCUS to conventional triage on the length of stay of patients in the emergency department.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
POCUS diagnostic sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 months
To determine the diagnostic sensitivity of POCUS performed during triage using the final reports of patients who requested imaging.
6 months
Emergency severity index Outcome Measure
Time Frame: 6 months
To examine the categorization changes after POCUS with the emergency severity index before POCUS application.
6 months
Manchester Triage System Outcome Measure
Time Frame: 6 months
To examine the categorization changes after POCUS with Manchester triage system before POCUS application.
6 months
3-group triage system Outcome Measure
Time Frame: 6 months
To examine the categorization changes after POCUS with 3-group triage system before POCUS application
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Triage

Clinical Trials on Point of care ultrasound (POCUS)

Subscribe