Optimization of Treatment Priority of the Manchester Triage System (OPTIMTS)

April 29, 2023 updated by: Kepler University Hospital

In the emergency department, the urgency for treating patients is determined according to the Manchester Triage System. The parameters collected in this process are deterministically translated into a treatment priority.

The Manchester Triage System (MTS), which has been in use for at least 20 years, is a widely used, validated and standardized procedure for initial assessment in the emergency department - this initial assessment (triage) is done to prioritize medical assistance at a central point. Especially in emergency situations, critically endangered patients often require the deployment of a large part of the available staff at the same time - the medically correct triage of patients according to objective criteria in order to enable an adequate allocation of the available resources at the right time is the main objective. In the optimal case, each patient is treated by medical professionals within the time frame that is adequate for his/her health condition.

Using artificial intelligence methods, it may be possible to increase the accuracy of treatment priority assignment. In the best case, incorrect prioritization of patients can be prevented and medical care can be ensured for those patients who actually need it most urgently.

However, initial assessment, even if standardized and validated, still runs under limited resource conditions - time, space, material and personnel. Last but not least, the very idea of conducting an initial assessment limits its validity, and the results of the allocation fluctuate according to current research, although the determinants of this are currently unknown.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

77976

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Upper Austria
      • Linz, Upper Austria, Austria, 4021
        • Kepler University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

As described in the inclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients that were triaged at the emergency department at the Kepler University Hospital in the period between 2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Admission to General Ward Positive
Admission to General Ward
30 Day Mortality Positive
30 Day Mortality
Admission to Intensive Care Unit Positive
Admission to Intensive Care Unit
Admission to General Ward Negative
30 Day Mortality Negative
Admission to Intensive Care Unit Negative

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUROC for Classification of Admission to General Ward
Time Frame: 2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31
AUROC for Classification of Admission to General Ward
2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31
AUROC for Classification of Admission to Intensive Care Unit
Time Frame: 2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31
AUROC for Classification of Admission to Intensive Care Unit
2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31
AUROC for Classification of 30 Day Mortality
Time Frame: 2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31
AUROC for Classification of 30 Day Mortality
2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confusion Matrix
Time Frame: 2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31
Confusion Matrix Results: true positives, true negatives, false positive, false negatives and values calculated from these results.
2015-12-01 to 2020-08-31

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Tschoellitsch, MD, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPTIMTS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Triage

Clinical Trials on Admission to General Ward

3
Subscribe